SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 64 Sayı: 64

The Impact of STEM Education on Disadvantaged Elementary Students: Science Attitudes and Collaborative Learning Skills

STEM Eğitiminin Dezavantajlı İlkokul Öğrencileri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Fen Tutumu ve İşbirlikli Öğrenme Becerileri

Esra Saraç Yıldırım(KİLİS 7 ARALIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9047-4434
Lütfiye Nur Nacaroğlu Aşkar(TC MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI GAZİANTEP)0009-0008-4908-2023
Durmuş Burak(KILIS 7 ARALIK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3310-1505
Pages
102–123
Publication Date
2026-06-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings highlight the need to more widely adopt STEM-based approaches as an effective pedagogical tool in science education for disadvantaged student populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract This study aims to examine the impact of a STEM education intervention designed for disadvantaged students on their attitudes toward science and their collaboration skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the research, a STEM education intervention was implemented for 4th-grade students in the units "Properties of Matter" and "Lighting and Sound Technologies." The research was conducted at a primary school located in a province in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye, where approximately 80% of the student population is composed of disadvantaged students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings highlight the need to more widely adopt STEM-based approaches as an effective pedagogical tool in science education for disadvantaged student populations.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:STEM · collaborative learning skills · science attitudes

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to examine the impact of a STEM education intervention designed for disadvantaged students on their attitudes toward science and their collaboration skills. The disadvantaged group addressed in the study consists of students who are socioeconomically disadvantaged and those under temporary protection. In this study, the pre-test–post-test control group quasi-experimental design, one of the experimental research methods, was adopted. Within the scope of the research, a STEM education intervention was implemented for 4th-grade students in the units "Properties of Matter" and "Lighting and Sound Technologies." The research was conducted at a primary school located in a province in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye, where approximately 80% of the student population is composed of disadvantaged students. A total of 46 fourth-grade students participated in the study, with 24 in the experimental group and 22 in the control group. According to the findings of this study, the STEM activities implemented in science education significantly improved the attitudes of students from disadvantaged groups toward science and enhanced their collaborative learning skills. These findings highlight the need to more widely adopt STEM-based approaches as an effective pedagogical tool in science education for disadvantaged student populations.

Özet

Bu çalışma dezavantajlı öğrencilere yönelik bir STEM eğitimi uygulamasının, öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine yönelik tutumları ile işbirliği becerilerine olan etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında ele alınan dezavantajlı grubu; sosyo-ekonomik açıdan dezavantajlı olan öğrenciler ile geçici koruma altındaki öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada, deneysel araştırma türlerinden ön test–son test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen benimsenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında, 4. sınıf öğrencilerine “Maddenin Özellikleri” ve “Aydınlatma ve Ses Teknolojileri” ünitelerinde STEM eğitimi müdahalesi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma, Türkiye'nin Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yer alan bir ilde, yaklaşık %80’ini dezavantajlı öğrencilerin oluşturduğu bir ilkokulda 4. sınıf düzeyinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Deney grubunda 24, kontrol grubunda 22 olmak üzere toplam 46 öğrenci araştırmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın bulgularına göre fen eğitiminde uygulanan STEM etkinlikleri, dezavantajlı gruplardan gelen öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine yönelik tutumlarını ve işbirlikli öğrenme becerilerini anlamlı düzeyde geliştirmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, dezavantajlı öğrenci grupları için fen eğitiminde STEM temelli yaklaşımların etkili bir pedagojik araç olarak yaygınlaştırılmasını önermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldırım, E. S., Aşkar, L. N. N., Burak, D. (2026). The Impact of STEM Education on Disadvantaged Elementary Students: Science Attitudes and Collaborative Learning Skills. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 64 Sayı: 64, 102–123. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.1740452

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Başar, M., Akan, D., & Çiftçi, M. (2018). Mülteci öğrencilerin bulunduğu sınıflarda öğrenme sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlar[Problems encountered in the learning process in classrooms with refugee students]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(5), 1571-1578.
  2. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press, Virginia.
  3. Bakan, G., & Bircan, M. A. (2025). Enhancing 21st-century skills of primary school students in rural areas through STEM activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2517265
  4. Bircan, M. A., & Çalışıcı, H. (2022). STEM eğitimi etkinliklerinin ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin STEM’e yönelik tutumlarına, 21. yüzyıl becerilerine ve matematik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of STEM education activities on fourth-grade primary school students’ attitudes toward STEM, 21st-century skills, and mathematics achievement]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 47(211), 87-119.
  5. Burak, D. (2020). İlkokul sosyal bilgiler öğretimine yönelik uyarlanabilir bir öğrenme ortamının tasarlanması, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi [Designing, implementing, and evaluating an adaptable learning environment for primary school social studies education]. (Doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  6. Capraro, M. M., & Jones, M. (2013). Interdisciplinary STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning (pp. 51–58). Brill.
  7. Chen, S. K., Yang, Y. T. C., Lin, C., & Lin, S. S. (2023). Dispositions of 21st-century skills in STEM programs and their changes over time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1363–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10288-0
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Cinar, S., Pirasa, N., & Sadoglu, G. P. (2016). Views of Science and Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers Regarding STEM. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479-1487.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2th ed.). New York: Routledge.
  11. Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM Education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of ınnovation. Educatian and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
  12. Directorate General of Migration Management. (2024). Migration statistics. Ministry of Interior, Republic of Türkiye. Retrived from https://www.goc.gov.tr/
  13. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2004). İşbirlikçi öğrenme yönteminin fen bilgisi dersinde akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi [The impact of the collaborative learning method on academic achievement and attitudes in science education]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 1(2), 103-115.
  14. Durkin, A. (2018). Can providing young children with opportunities to participate in STEM activities encourage cooperative learning? (Master’s thesis). Hofstra University.
  15. Elsey, C. M. (2019). Cooperative grouping in the inclusive STEM classroom (Master’s thesis). Rowan University. Rowan Digital Works. Retrieved from https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/2670(open in a new window)
  16. Fındık, L. Y., & Kavak, Y. (2013). Türkiye’deki sosyoekonomik açıdan dezavantajlı öğrencilerin PISA 2009 başarılarının değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the pisa 2009 performance of socio-economically disadvantaged students in Türkiye]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 2(2), 249-273.
  17. Gazibeyoğlu, T., & Aydın, A. (2020). STEM uygulamalarının 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri dersine karşı tutumlarına etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigating the impact of STEM practices on 7th-grade students' attitudes toward science education]. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 724-752.
  18. Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio‐economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 93-129.
  19. Gillies, R. M. (2023). Using cooperative learning to enhance students’ learning and engagement during inquiry-based science. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121242
  20. Guelfi, E. (2022). The first step in a long journey: The importance of early STEM exposure. Vanderbilt Vanguard. Retrieved January 31, 2024 from https://vanderbiltvanguard.com/the-first-step-in-a-long-journey-the-importance-of-early-stem-exposure/#:~:text=Children%20who%20are%20exposed%20to,challenge%20to%20pique%20their%20interest
  21. Güvenç, Ş & Altun-Yalçın, S., (2020). STEM eğitiminin Suriyeli mülteci öğrenciler üzerinde etkisi [The impact of STEM education on Syrian refugee students]. Socıal Sciences Studies Journal, 6(54), 119-128.
  22. Hanushek, E. A. (2010). Education production functions: Developed country evidence. International Encyclopedia of Education, 401-411.
  23. Herdem, K., & Ünal, İ. (2018). Analysis of studies about STEM Education: A meta-synthesis study. Journal of Educational Sciences, 48(48), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.381417.
  24. Hikmah, N., Siregar, I. H., Mufit, F., Lufri, L., & Andromeda, A. (2025). The Effect of STEM Integration in Science and Physics Learning on Students' Scientific Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1).
  25. Howie, S., Scherman, V., & Venter, E. (2008). The gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students in science achievement in South African secondary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 29-46.
  26. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. ASCD Press. retrived from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=jZVRDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&ots=_OCRAyCjLZ&dq=Johnson%2C%20D.%20W.%2C%20Johnson%2C%20R.%20T.%2C%20%26%20Holubec%2C%20E.%20J.%20(1994).&lr&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q&f=false
  27. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative Learning in 21st Century. Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 841-851.
  28. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta‐analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105.
  29. Karagöz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı: Nitel, nicel ve karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık
  30. Karakaya, F., Yantırı, H., Yılmaz, G. & Yılmaz M. (2019). İlkokul öğrencilerinin STEM etkinlikleri hakkında görüşlerinin belirlenmesi: 4. sınıf örneği [Determining primary school students' opinions on stem activities: a case study of 4th-grade students]. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(13), 1-14.
  31. Kavak, T. (2019). STEM uygulamalarının 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen ve teknolojiye yönelik tutumlarına, bilimsel süreç ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi [The impact of STEM practices on 4th grade students' attitudes toward science and technology, scientific process skills, and problem-solving abilities]. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
  32. Kim, D. H., Ko, D. G., & Han, M. J. (2014). The effects of science lessons applying STEAM education program on the creativity and interest levels of elementary students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 43-54.
  33. Kuo, H. C., Tseng, Y. C., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2019). Promoting college students’ learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1-10.
  34. Lamb, R., Akmal, T. & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition priming model of STEM learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410–437.
  35. Leyva, L. A., Quea, R., Weber, K., Battey, D., & López, D. (2021). Detailing racialized and gendered mechanisms of undergraduate precalculus and calculus classroom instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 39(1), 1-34.
  36. Marshall, J. C. (2015). In Step with the New Science Standards. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 16-22.
  37. Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2016). STEM education report. Retrieved from: https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/stem_egitimi_raporu.pdf
  38. Murnawianto, S., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2019). Solar cookers as a STEM-based learning media of heat transfer topic at the middle school level. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing.
  39. Musker, J. (2024). How informal STEM learning opportunities benefit diverse communities. Journal of STEM Education, 15(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jstem.2024.56789
  40. Özer, Y. Y., Komşuoğlu, A. & Ateşok, Z. Ö. (2016). Türkiye’deki Suriyeli çocukların eğitimi: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Education of Syrian children in Türkiye: Issues and suggested solutions]. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 4(37), 185- 219.
  41. Rossi, A. (2009). The impact of migration on children left behind in developing countries: Outcomes analysis and data requirements. Available at SSRN 2490380.
  42. Seçgin T, & Sungur S. (2021). Investigating the science attitudes of students from low socioeconomic status families: The impact of problem-based learning. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 49(2) 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21447
  43. Summers, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2018). Development and validation of an instrument to assess student attitudes toward science across grades 5 through 10. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 172–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21416
  44. Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). STEM-based after-school activities and their effects on students. Educational Sciences, 14(1), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876
  45. Tosun, C., & Genç, M. (2015). Adaptation of the science attitude scale developed for elementary school students into Turkish: Validity and reliability studies. Elementary Education Online, 14(3).
  46. UNICEF. (2016) The State of the World’s Children 2016. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2016
  47. Vasquez, J., Sneider, C. & Comer, M. (2013). STEM Lesson Essentials: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  48. Wan, Z. H., & Lee, J. C. K. (2017). Hong Kong secondary school students’ attitudes towards science: A study of structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1292015
  49. Yıldız, M., & Ecevit.T (2022). A STEM activity in elementary school: Working with fossils like a paleontologist. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities (JIBA) 12 (1): 51–69.