SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 38 Issue: 1

Turkish validation of the Hernia-Specific Quality of Life Assessment Instrument

Rifat Mert Gülmez(Kayseri City Health Practice and Research Center)0000-0003-1507-0354
Yunus Dönder(Kayseri City Health Practice and Research Center,)0000-0002-0560-1708
Sedat Çarkıt(Kayseri City Health Practice and Research Center)0000-0001-7360-5121
Yusuf Sevim(Kayseri City Health Practice and Research Center)0000-0002-2708-1598
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-01-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our finding suggest that the HERQL questionnaire has a good reliability and can be used in the Turkish population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to verify the validity of the Hernia Specific Quality of Life (HERQL) questionnaire, which measures functional performance and postoperative quality of life, in the Turkish language and also to evaluate the quality of life of our patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: One hundred and one patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair at Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery between July 2021 and September 2021 were prospectively included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our finding suggest that the HERQL questionnaire has a good reliability and can be used in the Turkish population.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Groin hernia · HERQL · Quality of life

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to verify the validity of the Hernia Specific Quality of Life (HERQL) questionnaire, which measures functional performance and postoperative quality of life, in the Turkish language and also to evaluate the quality of life of our patients. Patients and Methods: One hundred and one patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair at Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery between July 2021 and September 2021 were prospectively included in this study. The HERQL questionnaire was administered to patients preoperatively, then on the first day and at the third month postoperatively. Quality of life, summative pain and satisfaction scores were determined as a result of the data. These scores were used for the validation of the questionnaire in Turkish. Additionally, preoperative and postoperative scores were compared with each other. Results: The internal consistency analysis was performed and it was determined that the questionnaire had good reliability in all scales. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that all values had a good fit to the established model. Conclusion: Our finding suggest that the HERQL questionnaire has a good reliability and can be used in the Turkish population.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gülmez, R. M., Dönder, Y., Çarkıt, S., Sevim, Y. (2025). Turkish validation of the Hernia-Specific Quality of Life Assessment Instrument. Marmara Medical Journal, Volume: 38 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1627901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Özer B, Tatar C, Benek S, et al. The comparison of anterior and posterior herniorraphy operations in recurrent inguinal hernias. Med Bull Haseki 2016; 54:90-3. doi: 10.4274/ haseki.2874
  2. Yu PW, Hao YX. [Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment on the adult groin hernia]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2018; 56: 495-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.08.002.
  3. Öberg S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Etiology of inguinal hernias: A comprehensive review. Front Surg 2017; 4: 52. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00052.
  4. Simons M P, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 2009; 13: 343-403. doi: 10.1007/ s10029.009.0529-7.
  5. Huang C C, Tai F C, Chou T H, et al. Quality of life of inguinal hernia patients in Taiwan: The application of the herniaspecific quality of life assessment instrument. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0183138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183138.
  6. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of selfreport measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007.632.200012150-00014.
  7. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
  8. Cronbach L J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334. doi: 10.1007/ BF02310555.
  9. Turan E, Arslan K, Erenoğlu B, et al. Kasık fıtıklarında Lichtenstein ve Desarda onarımlarının postoperatif kronik ağrı ve nüks yönünden karşılaştırılması:prospektif randomize bir çalışma. Med J SDU 2022; 29:454-61. doi: 10.17343/ sdutfd.1139412.
  10. Köckerling F, Simons M P. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visc Med 2018; 34: 145-50. doi: 10.1159/000487278.
  11. World Health Organization. Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance, WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. 1997, World Health Organization: Geneva.
  12. Pequeno N P F, Cabral N L A, Marchioni D M, Lima S, Lyra C O. Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18: 208. doi: 10.1186/s12955.020.01347-7.
  13. Urbach D R. Measuring quality of life after surgery. Surg Innov 2005; 12: 161-5. doi: 10.1177/155.335.060501200216.
  14. Parseliunas A, Paskauskas S, Simatoniene V, Vaitekunas J, Venskutonis D. Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Hernia 2022; 26: 735-44. doi: 10.1007/s10029.021.02399-4.
  15. Heniford B T, Lincourt A, Walters A, et al. Carolinas Comfort Scale as a measure of hernia repair quality of life: A reappraisal utilizing 3788 international patients. Ann Surg 2016; 267: 1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.000.000.0000002027.
  16. Staerkle R F, Vuille-Dit-Bille R N, Fink L, Soll C, Villiger P. Chronic pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair using the COMI-hernia score. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402: 935-47. doi: 10.1007/s00423.017.1592-7.
  17. Fränneby U, Gunnarsson U, Andersson M, et al. Validation of an Inguinal Pain Questionnaire for assessment of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 488-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6014.
  18. Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Kingsnorth A. Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain – a call for uniform assessment. Hernia 2002; 6: 178-81. doi: 10.1007/s10029.002.0082-0.
  19. Loos M J, Scheltinga M R, Roumen R M. Tailored neurectomy for treatment of postherniorrhaphy inguinal neuralgia. Surgery 2010; 147: 275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.08.008.
  20. Croghan S M, Fleming C A, Mohan H M, et al. Retention of urine after inguinal hernia elective repair (RETAINER study I and II). Int J Surg Protoc 2021; 25: 42-54. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.137.
  21. Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan B H, et al. Fade or fate. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 325-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464.005.0052-6.
  22. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, et al. Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1060-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5405.
  23. Croghan S M, Fleming C A, Mohan H M, et al. Retention of urine after inguinal hernia elective repair (RETAINER study I and II). Int J Surg Protoc 2021; 25: 42-54. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.137.