Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 39 Issue: 2

Epidemiological characteristics and predictors of surgical intervention in forensic sharp and penetrating injuries

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings underscore the value of early clinical assessment and regionspecific trauma data in supporting timely surgical decision-making, injury-prevention strategies, and local trauma system planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of forensic sharp and penetrating injuries and to identify independent predictors of surgical intervention in a tertiary trauma center.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients presenting with forensic-reported sharp and penetrating injuries to a level 1 trauma center between January 1 and December 31, 2024.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings underscore the value of early clinical assessment and regionspecific trauma data in supporting timely surgical decision-making, injury-prevention strategies, and local trauma system planning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sharp trauma · Penetrating injury · Surgical intervention

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of forensic sharp and penetrating injuries and to identify independent predictors of surgical intervention in a tertiary trauma center. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients presenting with forensic-reported sharp and penetrating injuries to a level 1 trauma center between January 1 and December 31, 2024. Demographic characteristics, injury mechanisms, anatomical injury locations, vital signs, imaging use, and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic health records. The primary outcome was the need for surgical intervention. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of surgery. Results: A total of 1,076 patients were included, of whom 123 (11.4%) required surgical intervention. The cohort was predominantly male (85.8%) with a median age of 30 years. Upper extremity trauma was the most common anatomical site (73.8%), particularly in self-inflicted cases. Hemodynamic instability at presentation was strongly associated with surgery (OR 10.70). Increasing age was independently associated with surgical intervention, with each additional year increasing the odds by approximately 3%. Male sex (OR 3.45) and foreign nationality (OR 3.69) were also independent predictors. Injuries involving the head, maxillofacial, or neck region were associated with a lower likelihood of surgical management (OR 0.18). Conclusion: In this large, single-center cohort of forensic sharp and penetrating injuries, older age, male sex, foreign nationality, and hemodynamic instability at presentation emerged as key early predictors of surgical intervention, while head, maxillofacial, and neck injuries were less likely to require operative management. These findings underscore the value of early clinical assessment and regionspecific trauma data in supporting timely surgical decision-making, injury-prevention strategies, and local trauma system planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altun, M., Korgan, M. B., Kudu, E., Aytemiz, M., Bozkurt, G., Yakın, F., Karacabey, S., Sanrı, E., *, M. A. (2026). Epidemiological characteristics and predictors of surgical intervention in forensic sharp and penetrating injuries. Marmara Medical Journal, Volume: 39 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1951357

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. John N, Milos B, Thomas S. Demographics and patterns of injury in patients with sharp penetrating trauma admitted to a Greater Manchester Major Trauma Centre: a retrospective fiveyear study. Int Clin Med Case Rep 2023;2. doi:10.59657/2837- 5998.brs.23.008
  2. Macpherson AK, Schull MJ. Penetrating trauma in Ontario emergency departments: a population-based study. CJEM 2007;9:16-20. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500014688.
  3. Bamdad S, Shirvani M, Shahriarirad S, Tamaddon M, Attar A. Epidemiology and characteristics of unintentional selfinflicted penetrating ocular injuries in children less than 6 years-old. BMC Ophthalmol 2024;24:461. doi:10.1186/ s12886-024-03729-7.
  4. Kafadar H, Kafadar S. Assessment of cases with sharp and penetrating object injuries. Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:777-81. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_625_18
  5. Kaya K, Akgündüz E, Yılmaz K, Şeker Z, Hilal A, Çekin N. Evaluation of cases had stab wound injuries, 2013-2017. Int J Innov Res Med Sci 2019;4:383-7. doi:10.23958/ijirms/ vol04-i06/673
  6. Kristoffersen S, Normann SA, Morild I, Lilleng PK, Heltne JK. The hazard of sharp force injuries: factors influencing outcome. J Forensic Leg Med 2016;37:71-7. doi:10.1016/j. jflm.2015.10.005
  7. Guest JD, Luo Z, Liu Y, et al. Acute penetrating injury of the spinal cord by a wooden spike with delayed surgery: a case report. Neural Regen Res 2023;18:2781-4. doi:10.4103/1673- 5374.373668
  8. Jessop TS, Martin L, Lategan HJ, Dixon JM, Moul-Millman NK, Steyn E. The suitability of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in triaging patients with penetrating neck injuries at a high-level trauma center, in the Western Cape, South Africa. World J Surg 2025;49:1351-8. doi:10.1002/wjs.12578
  9. Reginelli A, Pinto A, Russo A, et al. Sharp penetrating wounds: spectrum of imaging findings and legal aspects in the emergency setting. Radiol Med 2015;120:856-65. doi: 10.1007/ s11547-015-0553-x.
  10. Kudu E, Korgan MB, Altun M, et al. Epidemiological and clinical predictors of mortality in firearm injuries: A retrospective study from a level-1 trauma center. OTJHS 2025;10:296-303. doi:10.26453/otjhs.1720328
  11. American College of Surgeons. Advanced trauma life support: student course manual. 11th ed. Chicago (IL): American College of Surgeons; 2025.
  12. Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med 2018;18:91-3. doi:10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
  13. Demetriades D, Murray J, Charalambides K, et al. Trauma fatalities: time and location of hospital deaths. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:20-6. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.09.003
  14. van der Vlegel M, Haagsma JA, Geraerds AJLM, de Munter L, de Jongh MAC, Polinder S. Health care costs of injury in the older population: a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands. BMC Geriatr 2020;20:417. doi: 10.1186/ s12877-020-01825-z.
  15. Williams BM, Kayange L, Purcell L, Gallaher J, Charles A. Self-inflicted injuries: The intersection of mental health and traumatic injury in Malawi. Trop Doct 2021;51:390-7. doi: 10.1177/00494755211013197.
  16. Ekmekci M, Yaman S. Occupational health and safety among farmers: a comprehensive study in Central Anatolia, Turkey. BMC Public Health 2024;24:2732. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024- 20249-7.
  17. Ohmori T, Kitamura T, Ishihara J, et al. Early predictors for massive transfusion in older adult severe trauma patients. Injury 2017;48:1006-12. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.028
  18. Al-Thani H, El-Menyar A, Consunji R, et al. Epidemiology of occupational injuries by nationality in Qatar: Evidence for focused occupational safety programmes. Injury 2015;46:1806-13. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.023
  19. Ahonen EQ, Benavides FG. Injury at work and migrant workers: a priority for a global agenda in occupational health. Occup Environ Med 2017;74:231-2. doi:10.1136/ oemed-2016-103964
  20. Pega F, Govindaraj S, Tran NT. Health service use and health outcomes among international migrant workers compared with non-migrant workers: a systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One 2021;16:e0252651. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0252651
  21. Hegazy M, Slima SR. Pattern and outcome of assaulted penetrating thoracic and abdominal trauma cases: a two years prospective study. Egypt J Forensic Sci Appl Toxicol 2020;20:41-54. doi:10.21608/ejfsat.2020.24647.1128
  22. MacKenzie EJ, Rivera FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 2006 26;354:366-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052049