Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2005 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 0

Information Processing in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Travma Sonrası Stres Bozukluğunda Bilgi İşleme Süreçleri

Pages
61–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, conducted research and cognitive theories developed to explain the etiology and the symptoms of this disorder are presented under the headings of learning approach, social-cognitive approach, dual representation theory and attention and memory biases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the research aiming to find out the information processing abnormalities in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the basic concepts and methods of cognitive psychology have been used widely in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cognitive theories on which information processing models regarding PTSD rely, suggest that individuals approach the traumatic experiences with a series of belief that they possess before the traumatic event; and the pathological posttraumatic symptoms appear as a consequence of disintegration of information regarding the traumatic event with these pre-existing beliefs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, conducted research and cognitive theories developed to explain the etiology and the symptoms of this disorder are presented under the headings of learning approach, social-cognitive approach, dual representation theory and attention and memory biases.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the research aiming to find out the information processing abnormalities in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the basic concepts and methods of cognitive psychology have been used widely in recent years. Cognitive theories on which information processing models regarding PTSD rely, suggest that individuals approach the traumatic experiences with a series of belief that they possess before the traumatic event; and the pathological posttraumatic symptoms appear as a consequence of disintegration of information regarding the traumatic event with these pre-existing beliefs. In this article, conducted research and cognitive theories developed to explain the etiology and the symptoms of this disorder are presented under the headings of learning approach, social-cognitive approach, dual representation theory and attention and memory biases.

Özet

Travma sonrası stres bozukluğuna (TSSB) sahip kişilerdeki bilgi işleme anormalliklerini anlamaya yönelik araştırmalarda bilişsel psikolojinin temel kavram ve yöntemleri, son yıllarda daha çok kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. TSSB'yi açıklamaya yönelik bilgi işleme modellerinin dayandığı bilişsel kuramlar, bireylerin travmatik yaşantıya önceden sahip oldukları bir dizi inançla yaklaştıklarını; bireyin, travmayla ilişkili yeni bilgiyi önceki inançlarıyla bütünleştirememesi sonucu patolojik travma sonrası tepkilerin ortaya çıktığını savunurlar. Bu yazıda, bu bozukluğun ortaya çıkışı ve belirtilerinin açıklanmasına yönelik geliştirilen bilişsel kuramlar ve yapılan araştırmalar, öğrenme yaklaşımı, sosyal-bilişsel yaklaşım, ikili temsil kuramı ve TSSB'de ortaya çıkan dikkat ve bellek yanlılıkları başlıkları altında ele alınmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, B. (2005). Information Processing in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 0, 61–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/128570

References (17)

  1. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği. (1994). Mental bozuklukların tanısal ve sayımsal el kitabı, (DSM-IV) E. Köroğlu (Çev.). Ankara:
  2. Hekimler Yayın Birliği. Beck, A.T., & Clark, D.A. (1997). An information procesing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 49-58.
  3. Brewin, C.R. (2001). A cognitive neuroscience account of posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment. Behavior Research and Therapy, 39, 373-393.
  4. Brewin, C.R., Dalgleish, T., & Joseph, S. (1996). A dual representation theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 103, 670-686.
  5. Buckley, T.C., Blanchard, E.B., & Neill, W.T. (2000). Information processing and PTSD: A review of the empirical literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 28 (8), 1041-1065.
  6. Charney, D.S., Deutch, A.Y., Krystal, J.H., Southwick, S.M., & Davis, M. (1993). Psychobiological mechanisms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Archieves of General Psychiatry, 50, 294-305.
  7. Creamer, M., Burgess, P., & Pattison, P. (1992). Reactions to trauma: A cognitive processing model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 452-459.
  8. Emmelkamp, P., Bouman, T.K., & Scholing, A. (Eds.). (1995). The treatment of other anxiety disorders. Anxiety disorders, a practitioner's guide, (pp. 30-33).
  9. Fairbank, J.A., Schlenger, W.E., Caddell, J.M. & Woods, M.G. (1993). Posttraumatic stress disorder. In P.B. Sutker, & H.E. Adams (Eds), Comprehensive handbook of psychoputhology, (pp. 145-165). NewYork: Plenum Press.
  10. Foa, E.B., & Meadows, E.A. (1997). Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: A critical review. Annual Review of Psychology, 48,449-480.
  11. Foa, E.B., Feske, U., Murdock. B., Kozak, M.J., & McCarthy, P.R. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100 (2), 156-162.
  12. Freeman, J.B., & Beck, J.G. (2000). Cognitive interference for trauma cues in sexually abused adolescent girls with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29 (2), 245-256.
  13. Gelder, M., Gath, D., Mayou, R., & Cowen, P. (Eds.). (1996). Reactions to stressful experiences. Oxford textbook of psychiatry (pp. 140-144).
  14. Oxford University Press.
  15. Horowitz, M.J. (1973). Phase-oriented treatment of stress response syndromes. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 27, 506-515.
  16. Horowitz, M.J., Wilner, N., Kaltreider, N., & Alvarez, W. (1980). Signs and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Archieves of General psychiatry, 37, 85-92.
  17. Janoff-Bulman, R., &