Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Etkin piyasa hipotezi ve gelişmekte olan piyasaların birlikte hareketi

Efficient market hypothesis and comovement among emerging markets

Pages
286–301
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the firm evidence against the market efficiency could not be established because of the low explanatory power of the results generated from the vector error correction model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to investigate stock market cointegration from the market efficiency perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, eleven emerging stock market indices are tested by using weekly data for the period of January 1998- December 2008 and for the sub period of January 2002-December 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the firm evidence against the market efficiency could not be established because of the low explanatory power of the results generated from the vector error correction model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate stock market cointegration from the market efficiency perspective. Therefore, eleven emerging stock market indices are tested by using weekly data for the period of January 1998- December 2008 and for the sub period of January 2002-December 2008. Comovement among the emerging market countries was analyzed through Johansen cointegration test. The existence of two cointegrating vectors has been found at 5% significance level. However, the firm evidence against the market efficiency could not be established because of the low explanatory power of the results generated from the vector error correction model.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı hisse senedi piyasaları eşbütünleşimini etkin pazar pespektifinden araştırmaktır. Bu bağlamda 11 gelişmekte olan piyasanın Ocak 1998-Aralık 2008 ve Ocak 2002-Aralık 2008 dönemli haftalık verileri test edilmiştir. Gelişmekte olan ülke piyasalarının birlikte hareketi Johansen eşbütünleşim testi ile incelenmiş ve %5 anlamlılık düzeyinde iki eşbütünleşim vektörü bulunmuştur. Buna rağmen vektör hata düzeltme modelinin açıklama gücünün düşük olmasından dolayı piyasa ekinliğine karşı kesin bir bulgu ortaya konulamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, O., TOKMAKÇIOĞLU, K. (2010). Etkin piyasa hipotezi ve gelişmekte olan piyasaların birlikte hareketi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 286–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/128510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ALEXANDER, C. (2001). Market Models: a guide to financial data analysis. 1st ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. BALABAN, E. (1995). Einstein, risk ve gümrük birliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 50 (1-2), 77-93. ss. BERUMENT, H., İNCE, O. (2005). Effect of S&P 500 return on emerging markets: Turkish experience. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 1 (1), 59-64. ss. BUGUK, C., BRORSEN, W.B. (2003). Testing weak-form market efficiency: evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange. International Review of Financial Analysis. 12 (5), 579-590. ss. CERNY, A. (2004). Stock market integration and the speed of information transmission. research report 242. Prague: The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education – Economic Institute. CHEUNG, Y.L., MAK, S.C. (1992). A Study of the international transmission of stock market fluctuation between the developed markets and the Asian-Pacific markets. Journal of Applied Economics, 2 (1), 43-47. ss. CORHAY, A., RAD, A.T., URBAIN, J.P. (1993). Common stochastic trends in European stock markets. Economics Letters, 42 (4), 385-390. ss. CROCI, M. (2003). An Empirical analysis of international equity market co-movements: implications for informational efficiency. Research report 197. Ancona: Universita Politecnica delle Marche. DARRAT, A.F., ZHONG, M. (2000). On testing the random-walk hypothesis: a model comparison approach. The Financial Review, 35 (3), 105–124. ss. DARRAT, A.F., BENKATO, O.M. (2003). Interdependence and volatility spillovers under market liberalization: the case of Istanbul Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30 (7-8), 1089-1114. ss. EFENDİOĞLU, E., YÖRÜK, D. (2005). Avrupa Birliği sürecinde Türk hisse senedi piyasası ile Avrupa Birliği hisse senedi piyasalarının bütünleşmesi: İMKB Örneği. Unpublished Working Paper. ENDERS, W. (1995). Applied dynamic econometrics. 1st ed., New Jersey: John Wiley. ENGLE, R.F., GRANGER, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: pepresentation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55 (2), 251-276. ss. ERDAL, F., GÜNDÜZ, L. (2001). An Empirical investigation of the interdepence of Istanbul Stock Exchange with selected stock markets. Global Business and Technology Association International Conference, Istanbul. EUN, C.S., SHIM, S. (1989). International transmission of stock market movements. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24 (2), 241-256. ss. FAMA, E. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. Journal