SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2005 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 0

Re-Examining Attachment Theory Within the Framework of Information Processing Approach

Bilgi İşleme Süreçleri Açısından Bağlanma Kuramının Yeniden Ele Alınması

Feza BALKAYA
Pages
17–39
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of the current study is to examine the interplay between cognitive processes or constructs and attachment theory that offer a meaningful framework to understand ourselves and the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It can be proposed that attachment theory has been examined as a general personality theory in the literature (Pielage, Gerlsma & Schaap, 2000).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The studies related to adulthood attachment styles have dealt with two topics: Social relationships and coping strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of the current study is to examine the interplay between cognitive processes or constructs and attachment theory that offer a meaningful framework to understand ourselves and the world.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It can be proposed that attachment theory has been examined as a general personality theory in the literature (Pielage, Gerlsma & Schaap, 2000). The studies concerning with childhood attachment styles have generally focused on emotional and social development, thus, on the development of psychopathology. The studies related to adulthood attachment styles have dealt with two topics: Social relationships and coping strategies. However, investigating attachment styles within the framework of information processing has not gained much attention. Literature review concerned with the relationship between information processing and attachment styles resulted in only 19 articles (Psychlnfo and SSCI). The aim of the current study is to examine the interplay between cognitive processes or constructs and attachment theory that offer a meaningful framework to understand ourselves and the world.

Özet

Yayınlar incelendiğinde, bağlanma kuramının genel bir kişilik kuramı olarak ele alındığını görmekteyiz (Pielage, Gerlsma ve Schaap, 2000). Çocukluk dönemi bağlanma stilleri üzerine yapılan çalışmalar genellikle duygusal ve sosyal gelişim üzerinde odaklanmakta ve bunun sonucunda psikopatolojinin gelişimi incelenmektedir. Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri üzerinde yapılan çalışmalar ise iki konu üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Bunlardan ilki, sosyal ilişkiler, ikincisi ise stresle başaçıkma yollarıdır. Fakat, bilgi işleme süreçleri (algı, dikkat, örüntü tanıma, bellek, bilgiyi depolama ve geri çağırma) açısından bağlanma stilleri, çok az çalışılan bir konu olmuştur. Haziran 2004 itibariyle yapılan yayın taraması sonucunda (Psyclnfo ve SSCI), sadece 19 yayına rastlanabilmiş, bunlardan 10 tanesinin uzmanlık veya doktora tezi olduğu görülmüştür. Bu yazıda, yukarıda bahsedilen bilişsel süreçler ya da yapılar, dünyayı ve kendimizi değerlendirmede bize önemli bir bakış açısı sağlayan bağlanma kuramı açısından ele alınmaya çalışılacak ve bilgi işleme süreçlerinin bağlanma stilleriyle ilişkisi değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALKAYA, F. (2005). Re-Examining Attachment Theory Within the Framework of Information Processing Approach. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 0, 17–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/128463

References (10)

  1. Adam, K. S., Sheldon-Keller, A. E., & West, M. (1995). Attachment organisation and vulnerability to loss, separation and abuse in disturbed adolescents. In S. Goldberg, R. Muir &, J. Kerr (Eds), Attachment theory: Social, developmental and clinical perspectives. Analytic: London. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
  2. Beck, A.T., & Clark, D.A. (1997). An informtion processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35 (I), 49-58.
  3. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. II. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1980).
  4. Attachment and loss, Vol. III. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1982).
  5. Attachment and loss, Vol. I. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge. Brown, L. S., & Wright, J. (2001). Attachment theory in adolescence and its relevance to developmental psychopathology. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 15-32.
  6. Cassidy, J. & Berlin, L. J. (1994). The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child Development, 65, 971-981.
  7. Collins, N. L., & Read, J. R. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: Structure and function of working models. Advances in Personal Relationships, 5, 53-90.
  8. Fraley, R. C, Garner, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult attachment and the defensive regulation of attention and memory: Examining the role of preemptive and postemptive defensive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 816-826. Hazan. C. & Shaver, P.R. (1994). Bağlanma: Yakın ilişkilerle ilgili araştırmalar için bir çerçeve (Çev. Ali Dönmez). Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 16-17, Mart-Haziran 2000, 29-50.
  9. Hazan, C, & Shaver. P. R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270-280.
  10. Homann, E. (1997). Attachment and affect regulation in depressed mothers and their adolescent daughters. In J.Cassidy, & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 319-335). New York: Guilford Ingram, R.E., & Hollon, S. D. (1986). Cognitive therapy of depression from an information processing perspective. In R. E. Ingram (Ed), Information processing approaches to clinical psychology. Flora