SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 1

Examining the relationship between curriculum design approach preferences and their commitment to the curriculum of physical education and sports teachers

Ebru Aydın(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2158-6501
Murat Kangalgil(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7480-199X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this regard, it is believed that supporting studies aimed at enhancing teachers' adherence to programs and contributing to the effectiveness of the teaching process, especially for physical education teachers, is necessary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, it was aimed to examine the relationship between physical education and sports teachers' curriculum design approach preferences and their commitment to the curriculum and to determine the variables that affect these two concepts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, a total of 780 physical education and sports teachers, 400 women and 380 men, who agreed to fill out the scale form applied to the study on a voluntary basis, participated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this regard, it is believed that supporting studies aimed at enhancing teachers' adherence to programs and contributing to the effectiveness of the teaching process, especially for physical education teachers, is necessary.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Curriculum desing · Curriculum model · Physical education teacher

Abstract

In this research, it was aimed to examine the relationship between physical education and sports teachers' curriculum design approach preferences and their commitment to the curriculum and to determine the variables that affect these two concepts. In this regard, a total of 780 physical education and sports teachers, 400 women and 380 men, who agreed to fill out the scale form applied to the study on a voluntary basis, participated. The data of the research were collected using the "Personal Information Form", "Curriculum Design Preference Scale" and "Curriculum Commitment Scale". Independent T-Test, One-Way Anova, Pearson Correlation and Linear Regression analysis were applied to the data found to be normally distributed. In the analysis results, a significant difference was found in education program design approach preferences in terms of age and years of experience, and in commitment to the curriculum in terms of gender and years of experience (p<0.05). It was also observed that design approach preferences were associated with commitment to the program and design approach preferences were a significant predictor of commitment to the program (p<0.05). The conclusion of this study indicate that teachers' preferred instructional design approaches influence their adherence to the curriculum, particularly emphasizing the significance for physical education and sports teachers. Furthermore, it has been determined that teachers' preferences for instructional program design vary according to their years of experience and gender, and these factors have an impact on their commitment to the curriculum. While young teachers tend to prefer student-centered design approaches, more experienced teachers tend to adopt content and problem-centered design approaches. In this regard, it is believed that supporting studies aimed at enhancing teachers' adherence to programs and contributing to the effectiveness of the teaching process, especially for physical education teachers, is necessary.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, E., Kangalgil, M. (2026). Examining the relationship between curriculum design approach preferences and their commitment to the curriculum of physical education and sports teachers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Volume: 14 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1812034

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. Aberg, E., Koivula, A., & Kukkonen, I. (2020). A feminine burden of perfection? Appearance-related pressures on social networking sites. Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101319
  2. Alp, G. T., & Aksoy, B. (2021). Bilim, teknoloji ve kadın: Çalışmanın geleceğine dair bir değerlendirme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 248-264.
  3. Ashour, R., Khasawneh, S., Abu-Alruz, J., & Alsharqawi, S. (2012). Curriculum orientations of pre-service teachers in Jordan: A required reform initiative for professional development. Teacher Development, 16(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.722322
  4. Aşçı, M., & Yıldırım, R. (2020). Öğretmen failliği ile öğretim programına bağlılık arasındaki ilişki: Yunus Emre İlçesi örneği. OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(Özel Sayı), 6126-6149. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.806477
  5. Baş, G. (2013). Öğretmenlerin eğitim program tasarım yaklaşımı tercih ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13, 965–992.
  6. Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2021). Teachers’ Big Five personality traits, emotion regulation patterns, and moods: Mediation and prototype analyses. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 332-354.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677758
  8. Biasutti, M., Concina, E., Frate, S., & Delen, I. (2021). Teacher professional development: Experiences in an international project on intercultural education. Sustainability, 13(8), 4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084171
  9. Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2015). The contribution of perceived fit between job demands and abilities to teachers’ commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535736
  10. Burul, C. (2018). Öğretmenlerin eğitim programı tasarım yaklaşımı tercihlerinin öğretim programına bağlılıklarıyla olan ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir.
  11. Bümen, N. T., Çakar, E., & Yıldız, D. G. (2014). Türkiye’de öğretim programına bağlılık ve bağlılığı etkileyen etkenler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.2020
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  13. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
  14. Cheung, D., & Wong, H. (2002). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. The
  15. Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170210136868
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  17. Çam, Ş. S., & Acat, M. B. (2023). Öğretmenlerin farklılaştırılmış öğretim yaklaşımını uygulama ve buna ilişkin yetkinlik düzeyleri. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 96-120.
  18. Demeuse, M., & Strauven, C. (2006). Développer un curriculum d’enseignement ou de formation. Bruxelles: de Boeck. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.demeu.2006.01
  19. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237
  20. Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Hansen, W.B., Walsh, J. et Falco, M. (2005). Quality of implementation: Developping measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions. Health Education Research, 20(3), 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg134
  21. Fairclough, S., & Stratton, G. (2006b). Physical activity, fitness, and affective responses of normal-weight and overweight adolescents during physical education. Pediatric Exercise Science, 18(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.18.1.53
  22. Hasson, H. (2010). Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-67
  23. Henson, K. T. (2006). Curriculum planning. Illinois: Waveland Press.
  24. Horn, N. (2011). Curriculum orientation of virtual teachers: A basic interpretive study of secondary teachers’ development of curriculum orientations. Chesepeake: VA.
  25. Jenkins, S. B. (2009). Measuring teacher beliefs about curriculum orientations using the modified-curriculum orientations inventory. The Curriculum Journal, 20(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170902948798
  26. Joly, J., Tourigny, M., & Thibaudeau, M. (2005). La fidélité d’implantation des programmes de prévention ou d’intervention dans les écoles auprès des élèves en difficulté de comportements. Nouveaux Cahiers de la Recherche en Éducation, 8(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017533ar
  27. Karakuyu, A., & Oğuz, A. (2021). İlkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin öğretim programlarına bağlılıkları. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.915003
  28. Khalilzadeh, S., & Khodi, A. (2021). Teachers’ personality traits and students’ motivation: A structural equation modeling analysis. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1635-1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0064-8
  29. Kimonen E. & Nevalainen R. (2005). Active learning in the process of educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.003
  30. MacNamara, A., Collins, D., Bailey, R., Toms, M., Ford, P., & Pearce, G. (2011). Promoting lifelong physical activity and high level performance: realising an achievable aim for physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.535200
  31. Mamak, H., Temel, A., & Kangalgil, M. (2020). Examining the self-efficacy of primary school teachers and the problems encountered in physical education and game course. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), 336-358.
  32. Marques, A., Martins, J., Sarmento, H., Rocha, L., & Carreiro da Costa, F. (2015). Do students know the physical activity recommendations for health promotion? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12(2), 253-256. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2013-0228
  33. Marsh, C.J. (2004). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: Routledge.
  34. McNeil, J. D. (2006). Contemporary curriculum. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  35. O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33- 84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793
  36. Ornstein, A.C. & Hunkins, F.P. (2014). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues. Pearson: London.
  37. Öztürk, İ. H. (2012). Öğretimin planlanmasında öğretmenin rolü ve özerkliği: Ortaöğretim tarih öğretmenlerinin yıllık plan hazırlama ve uygulama örneği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(1), 271-299.
  38. Pai, F. Y., Yeh, T. M., & Huang, K. I. (2012). Professional commitment of ınformation technology employees under depression environments. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 10(1).
  39. Pence, K. L., Justice, L. M., & Wiggins, A. K. (2008). Preschool teachers' fidelity in implementing a comprehensive language-rich curriculum. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(3), 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/031)
  40. Piéron, M., Ruiz Juan, F., & García Montes, M. E. (2008). La opinión del alumnado de enseñanza secundaria sobre las clases de educación física: un desafío para los profesores y los formadores. Revista Fuentes, 8, 159- 175.
  41. Sakallıoğlu, G., & Özüdoğru, F. (2022). Öğretmenlerin öğretim programına bağlılıklarının incelenmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (41), 70-107. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1112046
  42. Salleh, H., Hamdan, A. R., Yahya, F., & Jantan, H. (2015). Curriculum orientation of lecturers in teacher training college in Malaysia. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 70-76.
  43. Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Beets, M. W., Beighle, A., Erwin, H., & Lee, S. (2012). Physical education's role in public health: steps forward and backward over 20 years and HOPE for the future. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599842
  44. Santacroce, S. J., Maccarelli, L. M., & Grey, M. (2004). Intervention fidelity. Nursing Research, 53(1), 63-66.
  45. Sarıtaş, S., & Aktay, E. (2020). Ayfer Tunç romanlarında toplumsal cinsiyeti. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(3).
  46. Shah, M., & Abualrob, M. M. (2012). Teacher collegiality and teacher professional commitment in public secondary schools in Islamabad, Pakistan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 950-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.229
  47. Sorensen, T. J., & McKim, A. J. (2014). Perceived work-life balance ability, job satisfaction, and professional commitment among agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(4), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.04116
  48. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: pearson.
  49. Temel, A., & Kangalgil, M. (2021). Oyun ve fiziki etkinlikler dersi öğretim programı kazanımlarının gerçekleşmesine ilişkin sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(229), 445-462. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/60215/874865
  50. Temel, A., & Temel, A. N. (2023). Moderate vıgorous physıcal actıvıty levels of prımary school students: break tıme and physıcal educatıon lesson. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(3), 202-217. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bsd/issue/81003/1364935
  51. Ünsal, S., & Korkmaz, F. (2017). Eğitim programı tasarımı tercihlerine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 275-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.305977
  52. Wang, J. Elicker, J. & McMullen, M. (2008). Chinese and American preschool teachers’ beliefs about early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Development and Care, 178 (3), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430600722671
  53. Wiles, J. W., & Bondi, J. C. (2014). Curriculum development: A guide to practice. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  54. Yıldız, R., & Kangalgil, M. (2021). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin ilköğretim ikinci kademe beden eğitimi ve spor dersi kazanımlarının gerçekleştirilmesine ilişkin görüşleri. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(40), 2146-2167. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.856590