Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Wage Regimes in terms of the USA and Turkey

Ücret Rejimlerinin ABD ile Türkiye Açısından Avantaj ve Dezavantajları

Pages
195–222
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The basic goal of that comparison is, to shape an optimum satisfaction in terms of the sides of wage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Flexibility or rigidity of wage policies has been the main source of wage theories.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the USA, there has been interiorized a flexible wage system, where the liberalism actors in, on the whole upward flexible, resistant to crisis and providing permanent employment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The basic goal of that comparison is, to shape an optimum satisfaction in terms of the sides of wage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flexible-Rigid Wages · Income Distribution · Purchase Power

Abstract

Flexibility or rigidity of wage policies has been the main source of wage theories. In the USA, there has been interiorized a flexible wage system, where the liberalism actors in, on the whole upward flexible, resistant to crisis and providing permanent employment. It can be mentioned that the factors, which are like sectoral, social, employee composition, effective on wage differentials. Wages to be flexible generally have a content effect on the macro indicators. Wage regimes, which implemented in Turkey, induced recessive economy, under competition and unproductiveness on product. Rigid wages would be tempting if the social additional wages. The basic goal of that comparison is, to shape an optimum satisfaction in terms of the sides of wage.

Özet

Emek piyasalarında ücret rejimlerinin esnekliği ya da katılığı, ücret teorilerinin temel çalışma konusu olmuştur. Liberalizmin hakim olduğu ABD’de, genellikle yukarıya doğru esnek, krizlerden daha az etkilenen ve sürekli istihdamı sağlayan esnek bir ücret sistemi benimsenmiştir. Ücret farklarının oluşmasında, sektörel, sosyal, işgücü niteliği gibi faktörlerden söz etmek mümkündür. Ücretlerin esnek olması, makro göstergelere genellikle olumlu yansımaktadır. Türkiye’de uygulanan ücretler ise, ekonomide hareketsizliğe, eksik rekabete ve üretimde verimsizliğe neden olmaktadır. Katı ücretlerdeki sosyal eklentiler çalışanlara cazip gelmektedir. Söz konusu mukayesedeki temel amaç, ücret düzenlemelerinde ücretin tarafları açısından optimum bir tatmin sağlayacak yapı oluşturulmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, V., ÇOBAN, A., TIĞLI, A. (2015). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Wage Regimes in terms of the USA and Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 195–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/127925

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Altonji, J.G., Williams, N. (1993). Using Wage Growth Models to Estimate the Returns to Experience, Seniority and Job Mobility. University of Cincinnati, Department of Economics, 327-355. Erişim: 02.05.2014. http://www.econ.yale.edu/~jga22/website/research_papers/altonji_willi ams_using_wage_growth_models.pdf Altonji, J.G., Devereux, P.J. (2000). The Extent and Consequences of Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity. Yale University, Deparment of Economics, Research Paper, Erişim Tarihi:01.05.2014. http://www.econ.yale.edu/~jga22/website/research_papers/altonji%20a nd%20devereux_extent_and_consequences_of_downward%20nominal %20wage%20rigidity%20RLE.pdf Biçerli, MK. (2013). Çalışma Ekonomisi. İstanbul:
  2. Beta Yayınları.
  3. Calistry, A.D., Galbraith, J.K. (2001). Wage Flexibility and Unemployment: A Panel Data Analysis of OECD Countries. The University of Texas at Austin. http://utip.gov.utexas.edu/papers/utip_18.pdf.
  4. Christoffel, K., Linzert, T. (2005). The Role of Real Wage Rigidity And Labor Market Frictions for Unemployment and Inflation Dynamics. European Central Bank Working Paper, (556). Erişim: 20.03.2014. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp556.pdf
  5. Clar, M., Christian, D., Ramos, R. (2007). Wage Flexibility and Labour Market Institutions: A Meta-Analysis. Institude for the Labor Study. IZA Working Papers, (2581). http://ftp.iza.org/dp2581.pdf. Erişim: 02.05.2014.
  6. Coe, T.D. (1985).
  7. Nominal Wages, The NAIRU and Wage Flexibility. Pennstate University. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=98FBA2416B 60DB2FC6BF1DF4B141F28E?doi=10.1.1.362.3646&rep=rep1&type= pdf. Çetin, B.I., Gün, M. (2013). Türkiye’de 2002-2009 Yılları Arasında Gelir Bileşenleri ve Gelir Eşitsizliğinin Analizi. DİSK Birleşik Metal İş Sendikası Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 36(1): 253-292. http://calismatoplum.org/sayi36/cetin-gun.pdf
  8. Doris, A., O’neill, D., Sweetman, O. (2013). Wage Flexibility and the Great Recession: The Response of the Irisih Labour Market. Institude for the Labor Study. IZA Working Papers, (7787). Erişim Tarihi: 02.05.2014. http://ftp.iza.org/dp7787.pdf.
  9. Elgrably, N. (2006). The Minimum Wage and Labour Market Flexibility. Montreal Economic Institute Economic Note. http://www.iedm.org/files/dec06_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 27.04.2014)
  10. Elsby., W. M., Shin, D., Solon, G. (2013). Wage Adjustment in the Great Recession. NBER Working Paper Series, (19478). Erişim: 10.05.2014. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19478.pdf?new_window=1
  11. Gürsel, S., Uysal, G., Acar, A. (2013