Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2011 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 28

The role of inadvertent reading on item-specific proportion congruence effect

İstemsiz okumanın maddeye özgü uyumluluk oranı etkisindeki rolü

Pages
1–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results showed that Stroop facilitation observed with mostly-congruent items diminished with upside-down stimuli.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Item Specific Proportion Congruence (ISPC) manipulation produces larger Stroop effect for mostly-congruent items, and smaller for mostly-incongruent items (Jacoby et al., 2003).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Stroop experiments it is not possible to detect reading errors in the congruent stimuli.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results showed that Stroop facilitation observed with mostly-congruent items diminished with upside-down stimuli.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Item Specific Proportion Congruence (ISPC) manipulation produces larger Stroop effect for mostly-congruent items, and smaller for mostly-incongruent items (Jacoby et al., 2003). In Stroop experiments it is not possible to detect reading errors in the congruent stimuli. In an ISPC manipulation, in the mostly congruent condition, the majority of stimuli are congruent, so the proportion of undetected word-reading errors would be higher in this condition, compared to the mostly-incongruent condition. In this study, we investigated whether or not inadvertent word reading has a role in the ISPC effect. To this end, the ISPC effect observed with normal and difficult-to-read stimuli were compared. Reading was made difficult by presenting words upside-down. Our results showed that Stroop facilitation observed with mostly-congruent items diminished with upside-down stimuli. However, orientation of the words did not affect the facilitatory or inhibitory Stroop effects observed with mostly-incongruent items. The present study showed, for the first time, the role of inadvertent reading in the ISPC effect.

Özet

Maddeye özgü uyumluluk oranı değişimlemesinde, çoğunlukla uyumlu olan kelimelerle gözlemlenen Stroop etkisi çoğunlukla uyumsuz olan kelimelerle gözlemlenen etkiye nazaran daha büyüktür (Jacoby ve ark., 2003). Stroop deneylerinde uyumlu uyarıcılardaki okuma hatalarını tespit etmek mümkün değildir. Maddeye özgü uyumluluk oranı değişimlemesinde, çoğunlukla uyumlu kelimeler büyük oranda uyumlu renklerle yazıldığından, bu uyarıcı grubunda tespit edilemeyen istemsiz okumaların sayısı da büyük olacaktır. Bu çalışmada istemsiz okumanın maddeye özgü uyumluluk oranı etkisindeki rolü incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla, kelimeleri tersten yazarak okumayı zorlaştırmanın çoğunlukla; uyumlu uyarıcılardaki kolaylaştırıcı Stroop etkisini değiştirip değiştirmediği araştırılmıştır. Deney sonuçları, kelimeler ters yazıldığında çoğunlukla uyumlu uyarıcılarla gözlemlenen kolaylaştırıcı Stroop etkisinin azaldığını göstermiştir. Kelimenin yönü çoğunlukla uyumsuz uyarıcılardaki kolaylaştırıcı ve bozucu Stroop etkisini değiştirmemiştir. Bu çalışma ile ilk defa olarak istemsiz okumanın maddeye özgü uyumluluk oranı etkisindeki rolü gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATALAY, N. B., MISIRLISOY, M. (2011). The role of inadvertent reading on item-specific proportion congruence effect. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 28, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/127646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Blais, C. ve Bunge, S. (2010). Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2758-2767.
  2. Blais, C., Robidoux, S., Risko, E. F. ve Besner, D. (2007). Item specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review, 114, 1076-1086.
  3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. ve Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
  4. Brown, T. L. (2011). The relationship between Stroop interference and facilitation effects: Statistical artifacts, baselines, and a reassessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 85-99.
  5. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L. ve Chanani, S. (2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 844-859.
  6. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L. ve Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory ve Cognition, 36, 1484-1494.
  7. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K. ve McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
  8. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N. ve Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8,331-335.
  9. Dunbar, K. ve MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622-639.
  10. Fraisse, R (1969). Why is naming longer than reading? Acta Psychologica, 30, 96-103.
  11. Hutchison, K. A. (2011). The interactive effects of list-wide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 851-860.
  12. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S. ve Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 638-644.
  13. Jacoby, L. L., McElree, B. ve Trainham, T. N. (1999). Automatic influences as accessibility bias in memory and Stroop tasks: Toward a formal model. D. Gopher ve A. Koriat, (Ed.), Attention and performance XVII içinde (461-486).
  14. Cambridge, MA: Bradford, MIT Press.
  15. Kane, M. J. ve Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control o