SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 39 Issue: 1

Archaeometric Analysis of Stone Deterioration in Ankara Castle from a Conservation Perspective

Ahmet Sansar(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6805-5495
Ali Akın Akyol(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4174-575X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-02-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data obtained will enable the methodological examination of the deteriorations observed in the walls of Ankara Castle from an archaeometric perspective, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in conservation science and archaeometry and providing a scientific reference for future conservation and restoration practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The subject of the study is the characterization and examination of stone materials used in the walls of Ankara Castle, determination of their physical, chemical and petrographic properties, documentation of existing deterioration types and investigation of deteriorations by archaeometric methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Physical tests (unit volume weight, water absorption capacity and porosity), total salt presence and types Nitrate (NO3-), Chlorine (Cl-), Sulfate (SO42-), Carbonate (CO32-) were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data obtained will enable the methodological examination of the deteriorations observed in the walls of Ankara Castle from an archaeometric perspective, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in conservation science and archaeometry and providing a scientific reference for future conservation and restoration practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ankara castle · Stone deterioration · Conservation

Abstract

The subject of the study is the characterization and examination of stone materials used in the walls of Ankara Castle, determination of their physical, chemical and petrographic properties, documentation of existing deterioration types and investigation of deteriorations by archaeometric methods. Therefore, in this study, information was obtained about the current preservation and deterioration status of the stones by visual examination and documentation and samples were taken for archaeometric analysis. With petrographic analyses, samples were determined as andesite (andesite, quartz andesite, andesitic volcanic breccia), limestone (sparitic, biosparitic biomicritic and meta limestone) and marble stones according to rock types. With the analyses, it was determined that there were deteriorations such as iron hydroxide and opacification seen in andesites depending on the mineralogy of the stone. Physical tests (unit volume weight, water absorption capacity and porosity), total salt presence and types Nitrate (NO3-), Chlorine (Cl-), Sulfate (SO42-), Carbonate (CO32-) were determined. The stones was examined through SEM analysis for micro-scale images that showed flaking and efflorescence-type deteriorations at the macro level. The presence of high levels of sulfur (S) was revealed by EDX analysis at the locations where these deteriorations took place. The elemental composition of the stones was determined by XRF analysis. The data obtained will enable the methodological examination of the deteriorations observed in the walls of Ankara Castle from an archaeometric perspective, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in conservation science and archaeometry and providing a scientific reference for future conservation and restoration practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sansar, A., Akyol, A. A. (2026). Archaeometric Analysis of Stone Deterioration in Ankara Castle from a Conservation Perspective. Gazi University Journal of Science, Volume: 39 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1684272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Dinçer, A., Ayan, S. Ankara Kalesi Koruma Geliştirme İmar Planı Projesi, (1987).
  2. Yavuz Y., Tarih içinde Ankara II: Aralık 1998 seminer bildirileri, ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, (2001).
  3. Galanti, A., Ankara Tarihi: Takım Ankara'nın Türkiye eline geçtiği tarihten Mustafa Kemal Paşa'nın Ankara'ya ayak bastığı ilk günlere kadar, (2005).
  4. Günel, G., “Ankara Kalesi: Ankara’da Bir Açık Hava Müzesi”, in: J. Warner, M. van de Mieroop (Eds.) Anadolu Medeniyetler Müzesi 100 Yaşında, Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi Yayınları, Ankara, 503-520, (2021).
  5. Kırpık, G., Erdoğan, A., Akyol, H., Kılcı, H., ve Çam, M., Şehr-i Kadim Ankara, Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi Yayınları, Ankara, (2015).
  6. Mamboury, E., Ankara Gezi Rehberi, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, (2014).
  7. Peschlow, U., Ankara: Die Bauarchäologischen Hinterlassenschaften aus Römischer und Byzantinischer Zeit, Phoibos Verlag, Vienna, (2015).
  8. Tunç, G., Özbay, F., Atauz, A., Korat, G., Sancar, M., Temur, N., Türkün, A., ve Ulusoy, Z., Şehrin Zulası: Ankara Kalesi, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, (2004).
  9. Ketin, İ., Genel Jeoloji – Yerbilimlerine Giriş, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul, (2016).
  10. Küçükkaya, A., Yapı taşlarının restorasyonu, Özlem Matbaacılık, İstanbul, (2014).
  11. Öcal, D.A., ve Dal M. Murat, Doğal taşlardaki bozunmalar, Mimarlık Vakfı İktisadi İşletmesi Yayınları, İstanbul, (2012).
  12. Fitzner, B., Heinrichs, K., and La Bouchardiere, D., Damage index for stone monuments, (2002).
  13. Liu, X., Koestler, R.J., Warscheid, T., Katayama, Y., and Gu, J.-D., “Microbial deterioration and sustainable conservation of stone monuments and buildings”, Nature Sustainability, 3(12), 991-1004, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00602-5
  14. Moncmanová, A., “Environmental factors that influence the deterioration of materials”, WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, 28, 1-25, (2007).
  15. Steiger, M., “Salts in porous materials: Thermodynamics of phase transitions, modeling and preventive conservation/salze in porösen materialien: Thermodynamische analyse von phasenübergängen, modellierung und passive konservierung”, Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 11(6), 419-432, (2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rbm-2005-6002
  16. Torraca, G., Lectures on materials science for architectural conservation, (2009).
  17. Steiger, M., Charola, A., and Sterflinger, K., “Weathering and Deterioration”, in: S. Siegesmund, R. Snethlage (Eds.) Stone in Architecture: Properties, Durability, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 225-316, (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45155-3_4
  18. Lazzarini, L., “General issue on the deterioration of stone”, in: Proceedings of the Meeting, The stone in monuments, Athens, 149-160, (2002).
  19. Lutgens, F., Tarbuck, E., and Tasa, D., Genel Jeoloji Temel Kavramlar, (Çev-ed: C. Helvacı.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, (2014).
  20. Tokmak, M., and Dal, M., “Classification of physical, chemical and biological deteriorations observed in Ankara Stone Monuments”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6, 8-16 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.718466
  21. Yatkın, T., “Tarihi Ankara Kalesi’ndeki Yapısal Bozulmalar ve Restorasyon Öncesi Malzeme Araştırması”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara (2019).
  22. Tokmak, M., “Documentation and examination of historic building materials for the purpose of conservation: case study, Part of the walls at the Citadel of Ankara”, Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Science, Ankara, (2005).
  23. Tokmak, M., Demirci, Ş., ve Bakirer, Ö., “Ankara Kalesinin Bir Bölgesindeki Andezit Taşlarının Bozulma Sorunları: Gençkapı Bölgesi”, 21. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı, 105-114. (2006).
  24. RILEM, Research and Testing, Materials and Construction 13, Chapman and Hall, Paris, (1980).
  25. Akyol, A.A., “Sivrihisar Ulu Cami yapı malzeme analizleri”, Akdeniz Sanat, 13, 36-55, (2019).
  26. Kerr, P., Optical Mineralogy, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1977).
  27. Rapp, G., Archaeomineralogy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2002).
  28. Ulusay, R., Gökçeoğlu, C., and Binal, A., Kaya Mekaniği Laboratuvar Deneyleri, Türkiye Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası Yayınları, Ankara, (2011).
  29. Albuz Geren, G., “İstanbul Topkapı Sarayı Darphane-i Amire Binaları Yapı Malzemelerinde Arkeometrik Çalışmalar”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, Ankara, (2019).
  30. Alkan, N., Restorasyon ve Konservasyon Laboratuvarları, İBB KUDEB, (2011).
  31. Akyol, A.A., Eskici, B., ve Kadıoğlu, Y.K., “Ankara Akköprü arkeometrik çalışmaları”, Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 1-19, (2013).
  32. Artioli, G. Scientific methods and cultural heritage: an introduction to the application of materials science to archaeometry and conservation science, OUP Oxford, (2010).
  33. Deniz, K., ve Kadıoğlu, Y.K., “Ankara Kalesi Sur Yapı Taşlarının Kaynağı”, Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10, 255-271, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/jas.2022.65807
  34. Koralay, T., Deniz, K., Duman, B., and Kadıoğlu, Y.K., “Mineralogical and geochemical characterization and implications for provenance of Roman granite columns in ancient Tripolis (Denizli, Turkey)”, Arabian journal of geosciences, 14, 1-23 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S12517-021-06744-W
  35. Amelinckx, S., Van Dyck, D., Van Landuyt, J., and Van Tendeloo, G., Electron microscopy: principles and fundamentals, John Wiley & Sons, (2008).
  36. Ohring, M., The Materials Science of Thin Films., Academic Press, New Jersey, (1992).
  37. Barnoos, V., Oudbashi, O., and Shekofteh, A., “The deterioration process of limestone in the Anahita Temple of Kangavar (West Iran)”, Heritage Science, 8(1), (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00411-1
  38. El-Gohary, M., “Effective Roles of Some Deterioration Agents Affecting Edfu Royal Birth House Mammisi”, International journal of conservation Science, 6 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3604.5522
  39. El‐Gohary, M., “Investigations on limestone weathering of El‐Tuba minaret El Mehalla, Egypt: a case study”, Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 10, 61-61, (2010).
  40. Shekofteh, A., Molina, E., Arizzi, A., Cultrone, G., Ahmadi, H., and Yazdi, M., “Characterization and damage assessment of stones used in the Pasargadae World Heritage Site”, Achaemenian period, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 13, 521-536, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1436728
  41. Price, C.A., and Doehne, E., Stone conservation: an overview of current research, (2011).
  42. Alves, C., Figueiredo, C.A., Sanjurjo-Sánchez, J., and Hernández, A.C., “Salt weathering of natural stone: A review of comparative laboratory studies”, Heritage, 4, 1554-1565, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030086
  43. Siegesmund, S., and Snethlage, R., Stone in architecture: properties, durability, Springer, (2011).
  44. Charola, A.E., McNamara, C., and Koestler, R.J., Biocolonization of Stone: Control and Preventive Methods (Proceedings from the MCI Workshop Series), Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, DC, (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.19492359.2.1
  45. Gulotta, D., and Toniolo, L., “Preliminary Investigations, Condition Assessment, and Mapping of the Deterioration Patterns”, in: F. Gherardi, P. Maravelaki (Eds.) Conserving Stone Heritage: Traditional and Innovative Materials and Techniques, Springer, Amsterdam, 1–36, (2022).
  46. Marrocchino, E., Telloli, C., Leis, M., and Vaccaro, C., “Geochemical-Microscopical Characterization of the Deterioration of Stone Surfaces in the Cloister of Santa Maria in Vado (Ferrara, Italy)”, Heritage, 4, 2996-3008, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040167
  47. Tanriverdi, Z., Akyol, A.A., and Kadıoğlu, Y.K., “Characterization of stone materials from the Roman Caracalla Bath in Ancyra”, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 34, 211-228, (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.55730/1300-0985.1955
  48. Uchida, E., Ogawa, Y., Maeda, N., and Nakagawa, T., “Deterioration of stone materials in the Angkor monuments”, Cambodia, Engineering Geology, 55, 101-112, (2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00110-6
  49. Şener, Y.S., “Ankara Roma (Caracalla) Hamamı’nda Koruma Çalışmaları: Yapısal Malzeme Bozulmaları ve Öneriler”, 33. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı, 233-255, (2018).
  50. Kadıoğlu, Y.K., ve Akyol, A.A., “Augustus Tapınağı 2008 Yılı Arkeometrik Çalışmaları”, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü 31. Uluslararası Kazı, Araştırma ve Arkeometri Sempozyumu, (2009).