Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1

DEFENCE AGAINST PATHOGEN İN PLANTS AND ANTIOXIDANTS

PATOJENLERE KARŞI BİTKİLERDE SAVUNMA VE ANTİOKSİDANLAR

Esra Koç(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN FAKÜLTESİ, BİYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ)
A. Sülün Üstün(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN FAKÜLTESİ, BİYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ)
Pages
82–100
Publication Date
2008-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This defensive compounds have the ability to decrease the harm, that the patogen causes, to the minimum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Plants are constantly exposed to a great variety of potentially pathogenic organisms, such as viruses, fungi, bacteria, protozoa, nematodes, and can be affected by adverse environment conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Plants develop many defence mechanisms to provide themselves from the pathogen attack.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This defensive compounds have the ability to decrease the harm, that the patogen causes, to the minimum.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antioksidanlar · Bitki · Savunma

Abstract

Plants are constantly exposed to a great variety of potentially pathogenic organisms, such as viruses, fungi, bacteria, protozoa, nematodes, and can be affected by adverse environment conditions. Plants develop many defence mechanisms to provide themselves from the pathogen attack. When considering plant and pathogen interactions, while the pathogen uses a series of chemical compounds, such as hydrolytic enzymes and toxins, plants have numerous defense substances, which include the synthesis of defense peptides, antioxidants, secondary metabolites, and proteins (Pathogenesis- related proteinler (PR)) with antimicrobial properties besides various forms of physical barriers. Antioxidants are involved in the prevention of cellular damage. This defensive compounds have the ability to decrease the harm, that the patogen causes, to the minimum.

Özet

Bitkiler virus, bakteri, protozoa, nematod, fungus gibi patojenik organizmaların ve çeşitli çevresel koşulların olumsuz etkilerine maruz kalmaktadırlar. Bitkiler patojen saldırılarından kendilerini koruyabilmek için birçok savunma mekanizması geliştirmişlerdir. Bu savunma sırasında patojen hidrolitik enzim, toksin gibi kimyasal bileşikleri kullanırken bitkiler ise fiziksel bariyerlerin yanısıra, savunma peptitleri, antioksidanlar, sekonder metabolitler ve antimikrobiyal özellikteki proteinler (Patojen ile bağlantılı proteinler (PR))’in dahil olduğu çok sayıda savunma maddesine sahiplerdir. Antioksidanlar hücresel hasarların engellenmesinde görev yapmaktadırlar. Bu savunmada görev yapan bileşikler patojenlerin neden olacağı zararı minimum düzeye indirmektedirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koç, E., Üstün, A. S. (2008). DEFENCE AGAINST PATHOGEN İN PLANTS AND ANTIOXIDANTS. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 82–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/1267302

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Płażek, Acta Physiologeae Plantarum, 25(3) (2003) 37.
  2. S. Özcan, E. GüreL M. Babaoğlu, M. Genetik mühendisliği ve uygulamaları, Bitki Biyoteknolojisi II, Bölüm 20 (2001) 261.
  3. C. Baron, P. C. Zambryski, Rev. Genetics, 29 (1995) 107.
  4. O. Kodame, W. X. Li, S. Tamogami, T. Akatsuka, S. Oryzalexin Biosci Biotech Biochem, 56 (1992) 1002.
  5. JW. Mansfield, Slusarenko AJ, Fraser RSS and VanLoon LC (Ed), Kluwer, Amsterdam, (1999).
  6. V. L. Lonn, V. Streien, V. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 55 (1999) 85.
  7. M. Legrand, S. Kauffmann P. Geoffroy B. Fritig, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A, 84 (1987) 6750.
  8. E. Rojo, R. Solanao, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 22 (2003) 82.
  9. M. Heil, R. M. Bostock, Annals of Botany, 89 (2002) 503.
  10. S.C. Mariana, F. Wagner, Plant defense and Antimicrobial peptides protein and peptide letters, 12 (2005) 11.
  11. H. Poontariga, P. Darinee R. Kannarat R. Charoensataporn, Science Asia, 29 (2003) 109.
  12. C. Çavdar, A. Sifil T. Çamsarı, Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi, 3-4 (1997) 92.
  13. M. Mehdy, Plant Physiol., 105 (1994) 467.
  14. P. S. Low, J. R. Merida, Physiol. Plant., 96 (1996) 533.
  15. C. Lamb, R. A. Dixon, Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 48 (1997) 251.
  16. G. P. Bolwell, Plant Biol., 2 (1999) 287.
  17. R. Mitler, TRENDS in Plant Science., 7(9) (2002) 405.
  18. Z. Chen, H. Silva, D. Klessig, Science, 262 (1994) 1883.
  19. U. Neuenschwander, B. Vernoloji L. Friderich S. Uknes H. Kessman J. Ryals, Plant Journal., 8 (1995) 227.
  20. http://www.mustafaaltinisik.org.uk/21-adsem-01.ppt).
  21. T. Xing, V. J. Higgins, E. Blumwald, Plant Cell, 9 (1997) 249.
  22. E. Uranova, D. Inza F. Van, Journal of Experimental Botany., 53(372) (2002) 1227 and Plant Cell, 9 (1997) 249.
  23. L. M. Palma, Journal of experimental Botany, 53(372) (2002) 1255.
  24. A. Levine, R. Tenhaken R. Dixon C. Lamb, Cell, 79 (1994) 583.
  25. D. L. Gara, M. C. Pinto, F. Tommasi, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 41 (2003) 863.
  26. O. Blokhnina, Academic Dissertation, ISSN1239-9469, ISBN 951-45-9631-5, ISBN 951-45-9632-3, ISBN 951-45-9633 (PDF), (2000).
  27. G. Noctor, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology, 49 (1998) 249.
  28. R. E. Beyer, Biomembr., 26(4) (1994) 349.
  29. S. Shigeoka, T. Ishikawa, M. Tamoi, V. Miyagawa, T. Takeda, Y. Yabuta, K. Yoshimura, Journal of Experimental Botany, 53(372) (2002) 1305.
  30. A. Meister, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 263 (1988) 33.
  31. C. Bowler, Van, M. Montagu, D. Inze, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 43 (1992) 83.
  32. J. V. Bannister, W. H. Bannister, G. Rotilio, CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., 22 (1989) 111.
  33. U. Takahama, T. Oniki, Physiol. Plant., 101 (1997) 845.
  34. R. Brigelıus-Flohe, M. G. Traber, The FASEB Journal, 13 (1999) 1145.
  35. D. P. Mascio, S. Kaiser, H. Sies, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 274(2) (1989) 532.
  36. H. M. Kang, M. E. Saltveit, Physiologia Plantarum, 113 (2001) 58.
  37. V. Arbona, J. Jacas, A. Garcia, A. G. Cadenas, Plant Cell Physiol, 44(4) (2003) 388.
  38. E. Kuzniak, M. Sklodowska, Planta, 222(1) (2000) 192.
  39. P. Harinasuf, D. Poonsopa, K. Roengmogkol, R. Charoensataporn, Science Asia, 29 (2003) 109.
  40. M. Jiang, J. Zhang, Plant Cell Physiol., 42(11) (2001) 1265.
  41. A. Güncan, E. Durmuşoğlu, HASAD, 233 (2004) 26.
  42. M. Tör, Tr. J.of Biology, 22 (1998) 271.
  43. E. Rojo, R. Solanao, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 22 (2003) 82.
  44. A. Meister, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 263 (1988) 33.