Journals / Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges) / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

A RESEARCH REGARDING THE LEVELS OF NOMOPHOBIA AMONG ACADEMICIANS

AKADEMİSYENLERİN NOMOFOBİ DÜZEYLERİNE İLİŞKİN BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Çisem Yaşar(ISTANBUL GELISIM UNIVERSITY, İSTANBUL GELİŞİM VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-0765-861X
Ferhat Perçin(IGDIR UNIVERSITY, IĞDIR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-7272-189X
Tuğba Saray Çetinkaya(ISTANBUL GELISIM UNIVERSITY, İSTANBUL GELİŞİM VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0003-1639-553X
Adnan Kürşat Teke(ISTANBUL GELISIM UNIVERSITY, İSTANBUL GELİŞİM VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0003-3715-8509
Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2024-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the findings of the study, it can be said that it is very important to understand how nomophobia questionnaire scores differ according to demographic characteristics in order to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of academicians and to develop new strategies in this direction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In parallel with the rapid advancement of technology, the increasing use of smartphones causes some problems. "Nomophobia", which refers to the state of being away from the cell phone or having connection problems, is one of these problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to examine whether the level of nomophobia of academicians teaching at a university located in the west of Türkiye differs significantly in terms of age, gender, academic title, and marital status variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the findings of the study, it can be said that it is very important to understand how nomophobia questionnaire scores differ according to demographic characteristics in order to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of academicians and to develop new strategies in this direction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nomofobi · Bağımlılık · Akıllı Telefon

Abstract

In parallel with the rapid advancement of technology, the increasing use of smartphones causes some problems. "Nomophobia", which refers to the state of being away from the cell phone or having connection problems, is one of these problems. The aim of this study is to examine whether the level of nomophobia of academicians teaching at a university located in the west of Türkiye differs significantly in terms of age, gender, academic title, and marital status variables. The sample of the study consisted of 205 academicians working at the university who voluntarily participated in the study. In the data collection process of the study, a questionnaire was used to determine the level of nomophobia. Data analysis of the study was carried out using independent sample t-test and analysis of variance test. The results of the analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the participants' general nomophobia levels and nomophobia dimensions in terms of gender, marital status, and academic title variables, while there was a significant difference between the categories of age variable. Considering the findings of the study, it can be said that it is very important to understand how nomophobia questionnaire scores differ according to demographic characteristics in order to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of academicians and to develop new strategies in this direction.

Özet

Teknolojinin hızla ilerlemesine paralel olarak akıllı telefon kullanımının her geçen gün artması bazı sorunlara yol açmaktadır. Cep telefonundan uzak kalma ya da bağlantı sorunu yaşama durumunu ifade eden "nomofobi" bu sorunlardan birisidir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin batısında bulunan bir üniversitede ders veren öğretim elemanlarının nomofobi düzeyinin yaş, cinsiyet, akademik unvan ve medeni durum değişkenleri açısından anlamlı farklılık gösterip göstermediğini incelemesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini üniversitede görev yapan ve çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılan 205 öğretim elemanı oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın veri toplama sürecinde nomofobi düzeylerini belirleyebilmek için bir anket kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın veri analizleri bağımsız örneklem t-testi ve varyans analizi testi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, katılımcıların genel nomofobi düzeyleri ve nomofobi boyutları açısından cinsiyet, medeni durum ve akademik unvan değişkenlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmazken, yaş değişkenine göre anlamlı bir farklılık olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Araştırmanın bulguları göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, öğretim elemanlarının verimliliğini ve etkinliğini artırabilmek ve bu doğrultuda yeni stratejiler geliştirebilmek için demografik özelliklerine göre nomofobi ölçeği puanlarının nasıl farklılaştığını anlamanın çok önemli olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yaşar, Ç., Perçin, F., Çetinkaya, T. S., Teke, A. K. (2024). A RESEARCH REGARDING THE LEVELS OF NOMOPHOBIA AMONG ACADEMICIANS. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17339/ejovoc.1405916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Adnan, M., & Gezgin, D. M. A. (2011). Modern phobia: Prevalence of nomophobia among college students. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 49(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001378
  2. Akman, E. (2019). The effect of the nomophobia on academic success: An evaluation on the political science and public administration students of Suleyman Demirel University. International Journal of Eurasian Research, 7(16), 256-275. https://doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.543756
  3. Anshari, M., Alas, Y., & Sulaiman, E. (2019). Smartphone addictions and nomophobia among youth. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 14(3), 242-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2019.1614709
  4. Arslan, H., Tozkoporan, S. B., & Kurt, A. A. (2019). Examination of nomophobia and fear of missing out among teachers. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 21(3), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.512074
  5. Avcı, S. (2020). Examining the nomophobia levels of teachers with sociodemographic variables [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çağ University.
  6. Aygün, A., Ulu, E., & Akça, R. P. (2023). A research on nomophobia: high school students example. Social Sciences Studies Journal (Sssjournal), 9(116), 8649-8656. https://doi.org/10.29228/sssj.72778
  7. Bahl, R. R., & Deluliis, D. (2015). Nomophobia. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. 745-754). IGI Global.
  8. Baykan, Z., Güneş, H., & Seyfeli Y. (2021). The relationship between smart phone addiction and academic procrastination and academic success in Erciyes University Medical Faculty students. World of Medical Education, 20(61), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.25215/0904.055
  9. Bhattathirippad, S., & Patel, N. M. (2021). Social networking usage, nomophobia and depression symptoms among young adults. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 9(4), 570-584. https://doi.org/10.25215/0904.055
  10. Burucuoğlu, M. (2017). A Research on nomophobia levels of vocational college students. Karabuk University Journal of Institute of Social Science, 7(2), 482-489.
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz Ş., & Demirel, F. (2021). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  12. Çırak, M., & Tuzgöl Dost, M. (2022). Nomophobia in university students: The roles of digital addiction, social connectedness, and life satisfaction. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 12(64), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1095905
  13. Durak, G., & Çankaya, S. (2020). Emergency Distance Education Process from the Perspectives of Academicians. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 159-174.
  14. Egger, O., & Rauterberg, M. (1996). Internet behaviour and addiction.
  15. Erdem, H., Kalkın, G., Türen, U., & Deniz, M. (2016). The effects of no mobile phone phobia (nomofobi) on academic performance among undergraduate students. Suleyman Demirel University the Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21(3), 923-936.
  16. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
  17. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
  18. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Pearson.
  19. Gezgin, D. M., Hamutoğlu, N.B., Başarmak, U., & Dağlı, E. S. (2020). Investigation of nomophobia levels of preschool teachers in terms of different variables. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 14(32), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.258.1
  20. Gordon, M. (2022). Solitude and privacy: How technology is destroying our aloneness and why it matters. Technology in Society, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101858
  21. Göktaş, H., & Demirer, V. (2023). The relationship between high school students' nomophobia, smartphone addiction and academic achievement level. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 13(1), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.1130214
  22. Gurbuz, I. B., & Ozkan G. (2020). What is your level of nomophobia? An investigation of prevalence and level of nomophobia among young people in Turkey. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(5), 814-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00541-2
  23. Güler, E. Ö., & Veysikarani, D. (2019). A research on nomophobia: example of university students. Journal of Beykoz Academy, 7(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/1.75-88
  24. Güneş, N. A., & Gücük, S. (2020). The relationship between nomophobia levels and academic successes in medical faculty students. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 14(3), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.691384
  25. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (2022). ICD World Health Organization. World Health Organization. Retrieved July 17, 2022, from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
  26. Idil, Ö., Çakır, R., & Akman, E. (2022). An examination of the relation between in-service preschool teachers and preschool teacher candidates’ levels of nomophobia and FoMO. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.104.9.5
  27. Kara, M. (2021). High schoolers’ usage intensity of mobile social media and nomophobia: investigating the mediating role of flow experience. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 409-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.21.24.8.1
  28. Kara, M., Baytemir, K., & Inceman-Kara, F. (2021). Duration of daily smartphone usage as an antecedent of nomophobia: Exploring multiple mediation of loneliness and anxiety. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1673485
  29. Karamete, A., & Öztürk, G. (2021). Views of academic staff about the assessment processes of online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. In G. Durak ve S. Cankaya (Eds.) Handbook of research on managing and designing online courses in synchronous and asynchronous environments (pp. 522-546). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8701-0.ch026
  30. Karslı, F., & Yavuz, B. A. (2024). Relationship of phubbing with depression, anxiety, selfesteem and other mental variables. Journal of Dependence, 25(2), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1332637
  31. Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.008
  32. Kocabaş, D., & Korucu, K. S. (2018). The disease of digital era: Nomophobia. Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics, 5(11), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_71_19
  33. Konca, A. S., Baltaci, O., & Akbulut, O. F. (2022). Problematic Technology Use Scale for Young Children (PTUS-YC): Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.888936
  34. Kukreti, S., Ahorsu, D. K., Strong, C., Chen, I. H., Lin, C. Y., Ko, N. Y., Griffiths, M. D., Chen, Y. P., Kuo, Y. J., & Pakpour, A. H. (2021). Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Chinese teachers during COVID-19 pandemic: Roles of fear of COVID-19, nomophobia, and psychological distress. Healthcare, 9(10), 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101288
  35. Kurnaz, E., & Serçemeli, M. (2020). A research on students' perspectives to distance education and distance accounting education in the covid-19 pandemia period. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi, 3, 262-288. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/usbad/issue/55116/745914
  36. León-Mejía, A. C., Gutiérrez-Ortega, M., Serrano-Pintado, I., & González-Cabrera, J. (2021). A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research. PloS One, 16(5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250509
  37. Müezzin, E. E. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between smartphone addiction and psychological symptoms. Adiyaman University Journal of Social, (45), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1355736
  38. Okuyan, C., Güner, P. D., & Güneş, S. U. (2019). Determination of nomophobia levels of nursing and medical students. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences, 8(4), 372-382.
  39. Olcay, A., & Esen, M. (2021). A study on determining nomophobia levels of travel agency employees. The Journal of Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Faculty of Tourism, 24(1), 72-98. https://doi.org/10.34189/tfd.24.01.004
  40. Öz, H., & Tortop, H. S. (2018). Investigation of university students’ nomophobia levels between personality types. e-Journal of New Media, 2(3), 146-159.
  41. Özduman, A., Gök. B., & Hadi, G. (2020). Mobile addiction status of mobile phone users and development of 5g technology acceptance intention models. The Journal of Information Technologies (JIT), 13(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.551198
  42. Ramazanoğlu, M. (2020). Determining the nomophobia levels of teacher candidates. Ekev Academy Journal, 81, 247-264.
  43. Sui, A., & Sui, W. (2021). Not getting the message: Critiquing current conceptualizations of nomophobia. Technol. Soc., 67, 101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101719
  44. Taşhan, A., & Ünver, Z. (2021). The Relationship of Social Network Use with the Fear of Being without the Mobile Phone (Nomophobia): A research on university students of graphic design and its possible future role. Ordu University Social Sciences Institute Journal of Social Sciences Research, 11(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.727647
  45. Toh, S. Y., Ng, S. A., & Phoon, S. T. (2023). Accentuating technology acceptance among academicians: A conservation of resource perspective in the Malaysian context. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 2529–2545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11288-x
  46. Türen, U., Erdem, H., & Kalkın, G. (2017). No mobile phone phobia (Nomophobia) prevalence: Samples of undergraduate students and public employees from Turkey. The Journal of Information Technologies (JIT), 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/1.75-88
  47. We are social (2023). Digital 2023 October global statshot report. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2023/10/digital-2023-october-global-statshot-report/
  48. Yılmaz, T., & Bekaroğlu, E. (2022). Does interpersonal sensitivity and paranoid ideation predict nomophobia: an analysis with a young adult sample. Current Psychology, 41(2), 1026-1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01501-4
  49. Yildirim, C., & Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137.
  50. Yildirim, C., Sumuer, E., Adnan, M., & Yildirim, S. (2016). A growing fear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development, 32(5), 1322-1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915599025
  51. Yorulmaz, M., Kıraç, R., & Sabırlı, H. (2018). Effects of nomofobi in sleeping at university students. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 5(27), 2988-2996. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.598