SavedAdd your journal

Journals / El-Cezeri / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Stability Parameters in Lentil Genotypes

Cuma Akıncı
Behiye Tuba Biçer
Ferhat Kızılgeçi
Önder Albayrak
Mehmet Yıldırım
Journal
El-Cezeri
Pages
287–291
Publication Date
2018-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The stability variance ( σ 2 i ) revealed that the lentil genotypes Kafkas, Cagil and FLIP2009-55L had the smallest variance across the environments, while the genotype Firat 87 had the largest stability variance ( σ 2 i ).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Total 20 lentil genotypes were examined for assessment stability in different environments for grain yield in Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Genotypes and genotypes x environments interactions were significant for grain yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The stability variance ( σ 2 i ) revealed that the lentil genotypes Kafkas, Cagil and FLIP2009-55L had the smallest variance across the environments, while the genotype Firat 87 had the largest stability variance ( σ 2 i ).
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adaptability · Genotype · Lentil

Abstract

Total 20 lentil genotypes were examined for assessment stability in different environments for grain yield in Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey. Genotypes and genotypes x environments interactions were significant for grain yield. The regression coefficient, deviations of the regression coefficients, coefficient of variation, ecovalence and stability variance were computed for genotypes. Genotypes FLIP2011-26L, ILL10975 and Firat 87 with a high stability ( b ) and high grain yield would be adapted to a wide range of growing conditions in a given production area with above average yield. The stability variance ( σ 2 i ) revealed that the lentil genotypes Kafkas, Cagil and FLIP2009-55L had the smallest variance across the environments, while the genotype Firat 87 had the largest stability variance ( σ 2 i ).

Özet

Total 20 lentil genotypes were examined for assessment stability in different environments for grain yield in Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey. Genotypes and genotypes x environments interactions were significant for grain yield. The regression coefficient, deviations of the regression coefficients, coefficient of variation, ecovalence and stability variance were computed for genotypes. Genotypes FLIP2011-26L, ILL10975 and Firat 87 with a high stability ( b ) and high grain yield would be adapted to a wide range of growing conditions in a given production area with above average yield. The stability variance ( σ 2 i ) revealed that the lentil genotypes Kafkas, Cagil and FLIP2009-55L had the smallest variance across the environments, while the genotype Firat 87 had the largest stability variance ( σ 2 i ).

🔖

Cite This Article

Akıncı, C., Biçer, B. T., Kızılgeçi, F., Albayrak, Ö., Yıldırım, M. (2018). Stability Parameters in Lentil Genotypes. El-Cezeri, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 287–291. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.403995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bicer, B.T., Sakar, D., “Stability parameters in lentil”, J. Central European Agriculture, 7(2006) 439-444.
  2. Yadav, N.K., Ghimire, S.K. Sah, B. P., Sarker, A. Shrestha S.M., Sah, S.K., “Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis in lentil”, International J. of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB), 1(2016), 354-361.
  3. Sabaghnia, N. Karimizadeh, R., Mohammadi, M., “Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for grain yield of lentil genotypes”, Žemdirbystė-Agriculture, 99 (2012): 305–312.
  4. Finlay, K.W., Wilkinson, G.N., “The analysis of adaptation in plant-breeding programme”, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14 (1963), 742-754.
  5. Wricke, G., “Uber eine methode zur erfassung der ökologischen streubreite in eldversuchen”, Z Pflanzenzücht, 47 (1962), 92–96.
  6. Eberhart, S.A., Russell, W.A. “Stability parameters for comparing varieties”, Crop Sci,. 6 (1966), 36–40.
  7. Francis, T.R., Kannenberg, L.W., “yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes”, Can. J. Plant Sci., 58 (1978), 1029-1034.
  8. Mohebodini, M., Dehghani, H., Sabaghpour, S.H., “Stability of performance in lentil genotypes in Iran”, Euphytica, 149 (2006), 343–352.
  9. Shukla, G.K., “Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability”, Heredity, 29 (1972), 237–245.
  10. Koc, M., “Studies on determining genotype environment interactions and stabilities on some red lentil cultivars and lines (Lens culinaris Medik.) for important agronomic traits in Southeastern Anatolia region ecological conditions. Cukurova Uni. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences (PhD thesis), (2014).
  11. Bakhsh, A., Ghafoor, A. Zubair, M., Iqbal, S.M., “Genotype environment interaction for grain yield in lentil”, Pak. J. Agri. Res., 12 (1991), 102-105.
  12. Kakar, K.M., Kakar, S.Z., Shawani, M.I., “Varietal dynamics of yield stability in wheat”, On-line J. of Biological Sci., 3(2003), 137-140.
  13. Turan, B.T., “A study on the yield and yield components of different varieties of winter lentils in Sanliurfa Condition. K.maras Sutcu Imam Uni. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences (Master thesis), (2003).
  14. Tumay, Z., Olmez, A., “A research on the yield and yield components of different lentil varieties under Adiyaman Conditions. K.maras Sutcu Imam Uni. Institute of Natural and