SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2019 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4

An Overview of the Recent Views and Practices in Teacher Professional Development

Öğretmen Mesleki Gelişiminde Güncel Görüşlere ve Uygulamalara Bir Bakış

Özlem Canaran(Türk Hava Kurumu Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2605-7884
İsmail Hakkı Mirici(Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi)0000-0002-0906-0259
Pages
350–362
Publication Date
2019-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper further mentions that effective PD programs should include students and their perceptions in addition to evaluation and follow-up support in order to achieve the desired outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents an overview of the current trends and practices in teacher professional development (PD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The paper is intended to provide teachers, teacher educators, and trainers with the theories and practices discussed in the literature over the last 25 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper further mentions that effective PD programs should include students and their perceptions in addition to evaluation and follow-up support in order to achieve the desired outcomes.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mesleki gelişim · Güncel görüşler ve uygulamalar · Öğretmenler

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the current trends and practices in teacher professional development (PD). The paper is intended to provide teachers, teacher educators, and trainers with the theories and practices discussed in the literature over the last 25 years. The data were selected from resources by entering relevant search phrases in journal databases, library catalogs, and websites on teacher PD. The paper primarily addresses the principles of effective PD and the models of PD. Next, different kinds of PD, including the practices that can enable teachers to improve their knowledge and skills as well as impacting student learning, are analyzed to determine the common denominators of those kinds that are considered effective in the literature. The paper also provides some implications that will be of value to researchers, teachers, and teacher trainers. The overview reveals that effective PD must involve teachers in decision-making as well as encourage reflection, classroom research, and collaboration. The paper further mentions that effective PD programs should include students and their perceptions in addition to evaluation and follow-up support in order to achieve the desired outcomes.

Özet

Bu makale öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerindeki (MG) güncel eğilimlerin ve uygulamaların genel bir değerlendirmesini sunmaktadır. Makalenin amacı, öğretmenlere, öğretmen eğiticilerine ve eğitimcilere literatürde son 25 yılda tartışılan teorileri ve uygulamaları sunmaktır. Veriler; öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi üzerine olan dergi veri tabanlarına, kütüphane kataloglarına ve internet sitelerine ilgili sözcük grupları girilip kaynaklara ulaşılarak toplanmıştır. Bu makale, öncelikle etkili MG’nin ve MG modellerinin prensiplerine değinmektedir. Ardından literatürde etkili olduğu belirtilen MG çeşitlerinin ortak paydalarını belirlemek amacıyla ilgili MG çeşitleri incelenmiştir. Bu MG çeşitleri, öğrencilerin öğrenimini etkilediği kadar öğretmenlerin bilgi ve becerilerini geliştirmesini de sağlayan uygulamaları da içermektedir. Bu makale ayrıca araştırmacılar, öğretmenler ve öğretmen eğiticileri için değerli olacak sonuçları ve çıkarımları da sunmaktadır. Genel değerlendirme, etkili bir MG’nin hem yansıtıcı düşünmeyi, sınıf araştırmasını ve işbirliğini teşvik etmesi, hem de öğretmenleri karar verme sürecine dahil etmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Makale, bunlarla birlikte, etkili MG programlarının istenen sonuçlara ulaşabilmesi için, değerlendirme, izlem, öğrenciler ve öğrencilerin algılarını da içermesi gerektiğine eğilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Canaran, Ö., Mirici, İ. H. (2019). An Overview of the Recent Views and Practices in Teacher Professional Development. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4, 350–362. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.559281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Allison, S. (2014). Perfect teacher-led CPD. Carmarthen, Wales: Independent Thinking Press.
  2. Bailey, K., Curtis, A., & Nunan, D. (2001). Pursuing professional development: the self as source. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
  3. Bayram, İ., & Bıkmaz, F. (2018). Exploring the lesson study experience of EFL instructors at higher education: A pilot study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 313-340. doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s15m
  4. Benoit, R., & Haugh, B. (2001). Team teaching tips for foreign language teachers. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(10), 1-8.
  5. Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: A programme of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. The International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 29-39.
  6. Bell, M. (2005). Peer observation partnerships in higher education. Milperra, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Inc.
  7. Borg, S. (2015a). Contemporary perspectives on continuing professional development, Ankara: British Council.
  8. Borg, S. (Ed.). (2015b). Professional development for English language teachers: Perspectives from higher education in Turkey. Ankara: British Council. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/professional-development-english-language-teachers-perspectives-higher-educationturkey
  9. Broad, K. & Evans, M. (2006). A review of literature on professional development content and delivery modes for experienced teachers (Technical report). Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Education.
  10. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.
  11. Brown-Easton, L. (2004). Powerful designs for professional learning. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
  12. Brown, M., & Macatangay, A. (2002). The impact of action research for professional development: Case studies in two Manchester schools. Westminster Studies in Education, 25(1), 35-45.
  13. Buckley, F. J. (2000). Team teaching: What, why and how? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  14. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
  15. Carless, D., & Walker, E. (2006). Effective team teaching between local and native speaking English teachers. Language and Education 20(6), 463-477.
  16. Corcoran, T. C. (1995). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
  17. Constantino, P. M., & de Lorenzo, M. N. (2002). Developing a professional teaching portfolio. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
  19. Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary course and team teaching: New arrangement for learning. Phoenix, TX: ACE/Oryx.
  20. Davis, J. R. (1997). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching. Phoenix, TX: American Council on Education/Oryx Press Series on Higher Education.
  21. Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.
  22. Delong, J., & Wideman, R. (Eds.) (1998). Action research: School improvement through research-based professionalism - Professional development kit. Mississauga, Ontario: The Ontario Public School Teachers’ Federation.
  23. Dudley, P. (2014) Lesson study: A handbook. Retrieved from http://lessonstudy.co.uk/lesson-study-ahandbook
  24. Engin, M., & Priest, B. (2014). Observing teaching: A lens for self-reflection. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 2(2), 2-9.
  25. Fatimah, N. (2013). Challenges in implementing lesson study at higher education. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padandg, 1, 201-205.
  26. Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal 30(2), 295-311.
  27. Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343-54.
  28. Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting pupils: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.
  29. Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
  30. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  31. Guskey, T. R., (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391.
  32. Harris, B. (2000). A strategy for identifying the professional development needs of teachers: A report from New South Wales. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(1), 25-47. doi:10.1080/13674580000200109
  33. Horwich, J. (1999, October 24). Cracks widen in team teaching of English. Asahi Evening News, Life Section.
  34. Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2), 235-250.
  35. Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Development, 51(3), 221-227.
  36. Liebtag, E., & Ark, V. T. (2017). Professional learning: The power of school visits. Retrieved from http://www.gettingsmart.com/2017/03/professional-learning-the-power-of-school-visits
  37. Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 9(4), 509-536.
  38. Liu, L. B. (2015). Teacher educator international professional development as ren. Heidelberg: Springer.
  39. Lodge, C. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematizing student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 125-146.
  40. McLaughlin, M., & Zarrow, J. (2001). Teachers engaged in evidence-based reform: Trajectories of teachers’ inquiry, analysis, and action. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 79-101). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  41. McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
  42. Mermelstein, D. A. (2018). Reflective teaching as a form of professional development. MexTesol Journal, 42(4). Retrieved from http://mextesol.net/journal/public/files/f562775447eac0dfc9111adccd6c25be.pdf
  43. Mitra, D. L. (2008). Student voice in school reform. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  44. Muijs, D., Day, C., Harris, A., & Lindsay, G. (2004) Evaluating continuing professional development: An overview. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 291-310). Ballmoor, Bucks: Open University Press.
  45. Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 1-12). Dordrecht: Springer.
  46. OECD (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publications. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/35004165.pdf
  47. Rabb, R. (2009). Team teaching. Retrieved from http://www.usma.edu/cfe/Literature/Rabb_09.pdf
  48. Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  49. Richardson, S., & Díaz-Maggioli, G. (2018). Effective professional development: Principles and best practice (Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Rose, J., & Reynolds, D. (2009). Teachers continuing professional development: A new approach. 20th Annual World ICSEI, U.K. Retrieved from www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-6573-65-8/219-240.pdf
  51. Tobin, D. R. (1998). Corporate learning strategies: Building your own personal learning network. Retrieved from http://www.tobincls.com/learningnetwork.htm
  52. Tajino, A., Stewart, T., & Dalsky, D. (Eds.). (2016). Team teaching and team learning in the language classroom: Collaboration for innovation in ELT. Abingdon: Routledge.
  53. Tsui, B. M., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1289-1301.
  54. U.S. Department of Education Academy for Educational Development. (2010). Smaller learning communities program grantee guide learning in action: How to conduct and learn from high quality site visits. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/slcp/lia-conduct-and-learnhiqualitysitevisits508.pdf
  55. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133010e.pdf
  56. Warren-Little, J. (2001) Professional development in pursuit of school reform. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 23-44). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  57. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.