SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2016 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 38

Türk Kimliği İçerikleri: Sosyal Psikolojik Bir Yaklaşım

Nagihan TAŞDEMİR
BENGİ ÖNER ÖZKAN
Pages
35–53
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results suggested that the contents of Turkish identity could be defined in terms of In-group Boundaries, Motivations of Having a Turkish Identity, Intergroup Relations with Others and Perceptions of Threat, and Stereotypes Concerning Turkish Identity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study reviews social psychological studies of the contents of national identities in terms of boundary definitions (e.g., civic, cultural, ethnic), underlying motivations (e.g., self-esteem, continuity, distinctiveness), nationalistic attitudes (nationalism and patriotism), and intergroup relations and perceptions of threat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, 64 university students from big cities in Turkey answered 8-openended questions about the Turkish identity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results suggested that the contents of Turkish identity could be defined in terms of In-group Boundaries, Motivations of Having a Turkish Identity, Intergroup Relations with Others and Perceptions of Threat, and Stereotypes Concerning Turkish Identity.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study reviews social psychological studies of the contents of national identities in terms of boundary definitions (e.g., civic, cultural, ethnic), underlying motivations (e.g., self-esteem, continuity, distinctiveness), nationalistic attitudes (nationalism and patriotism), and intergroup relations and perceptions of threat. Based on this review, it aims to define the contents of Turkish identity. To this end, 64 university students from big cities in Turkey answered 8-openended questions about the Turkish identity. The open-ended answers were then analyzed via thematic analysis. Results suggested that the contents of Turkish identity could be defined in terms of In-group Boundaries, Motivations of Having a Turkish Identity, Intergroup Relations with Others and Perceptions of Threat, and Stereotypes Concerning Turkish Identity. In light of the results, a descriptive framework is proposed for the contents of Turkish identity

Özet

Bu çalışmada öncelikli olarak ulusal kimlik içeriklerini farklı yönleriyle ele alan sosyal psikoloji çalışmaları gözden geçirilmektedir. Bu çalışmalardan hareketle, ulusal kimlikle ilgili olarak, sınırlara ilişkin tanımlamalar (vatandaşlık, kültür ve etnik köken vb.), motivasyon kaynakları (özsaygı, süreklilik, ayırt edilme vb.), ulusal tutumlar (vatanseverlik ve milliyetçilik) ve gruplar arası ilişkiler ve tehdit algısı gibi konulara yer verilmektedir. Daha sonra, Türk ulusal kimliği içerikleri tanımlanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmada, 64 üniversite öğrencisi Türk kimliği hakkında 8 açık uçlu soruya yazılı olarak cevap vermiştir. Cevaplar tematik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre bu içerikleri, Türk Kimliğinin Sınırlarına İlişkin Tanımlar, Türk Kimliğine Sahip Olmanın Motivasyon Kaynakları, Türk İç Grubunun Diğerleriyle İlişkileri ve Tehdit Algısı ve Türk Kimliğine İlişkin Kalıpyargılar başlıkları altında toplamak mümkün görünmektedir. Bulgular ışığında bu çalışma Türk kimliği içeriklerinin tanımlanma biçimlerine ilişkin betimleyici bir çerçeve sunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞDEMİR, N., ÖZKAN, B. Ö. (2016). Türk Kimliği İçerikleri: Sosyal Psikolojik Bir Yaklaşım. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 38, 35–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/125986

References (8)

  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso. Arslan-Akfırat, S. ve Öner-Özkan, B. (2010). Ulusal/etnik kimliklerin stratejik inşası: Kuzey Kıbrıs örneği, Bilig 52, 1-32.
  2. Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology. WileyBlackwell, Oxford. Billiet, J., Maddens, B. ve Beerten, R. (2003). National identity and attitude toward foreigners in a multinational state: A replication. Political Psychology, 24(2), 241-257.
  3. Billig, M. (1996). Nationalism as an international ideology: Imagining the nation, others and the world of nations. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons, (Ed.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change içinde (181-194). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Blank, T. ve Schmidt, S. (2003). National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology, 24(2), 289-312.
  4. Bora, T. (2003). Nationalist discourse in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2/3), 433-451.
  5. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R. ve Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. N. Ellemers, R. Spears ve B. Doosje, (Ed.), Social identity: context, commitment, content içinde (35-58). Oxford: Blackwell. Breakwell, G. (1996). Identity processes and social change. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons, (Ed.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social changes içinde (13-30). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
  6. Brewer, M. B. (1993). The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behavior. M. Hogg ve Abrams, (Ed.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives içinde (1-16). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Cairns, E., Kenworthy, J. Campbell, A. ve Hewstone, M. (2006). The role of in-group identification, religious group membership and intergroup conflict in moderating in-group and out-group affect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 701-716.
  7. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Paladino, M. P. ve Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: In-group identification, in group entitativity, and in group bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135-143.
  8. Cinnirella, M. (1996). A social identity perspective on European integration. G. M. Breakwell ve E. Lyons, (Ed.), Changing European identities: Social psycholog