Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COST LEADERSHIP STRATEGY, TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

MALİYET LİDERLİĞİ STRATEJİSİ, TOPLAM KALİTE YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARI VE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
97–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the relationship between TQM applications and financial performance has also been gathered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Firms need to implement some competition strategies and total quality management applications to overcome the fierce competition among others.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to show the relationship between cost leadership strategy, total quality management applications and firms’ financial performance with literature review and empirical analysis. 449 questionnaires were conducted to the managers of 142 big firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the relationship between TQM applications and financial performance has also been gathered.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maliyet Liderliği Stratejisi · Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Uygulamaları · Finansal Performans

Abstract

Firms need to implement some competition strategies and total quality management applications to overcome the fierce competition among others. The purpose of this study is to show the relationship between cost leadership strategy, total quality management applications and firms’ financial performance with literature review and empirical analysis. 449 questionnaires were conducted to the managers of 142 big firms. The data gathered was assessed with AMOS. As a result, the relationship between cost leadership strategy, total quality management applications and firms’ financial performance has been gathered. In addition, the relationship between TQM applications and financial performance has also been gathered.

Özet

İşletmeler rekabetin üstesinden gelebilmek için bazı rekabet stratejileri ve toplam kalite yönetimi prensiplerini uygulama gereği duyarlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı maliyet liderliği stratejisi, toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamaları ve finansal perfromans arasındaki ilişkiyi literatür çalışması ve ampirik analizle göstermektir. 142 büyük işletmenin 449 yöneticisine anket uygulandı. Toplanan bilgi AMOS ile değerlendirildi. Sonuç olarak, maliyet liderliği stratejisi, toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamaları ve finansal performans arasındaki ilişki ortaya kondu. Bununla birlikte TKY uygulamaları ve finansal performans arasındaki ilişki de değerlendirildi

🔖

Cite This Article

KURT, A., ZEHİR, C. (2016). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COST LEADERSHIP STRATEGY, TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 97–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/125974

References (12)

  1. Acar, A. Z., & Zehir, C. (2010). The Harmonized Effects of Generic Strategies and Business Capabilities on Business Performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(4), 689-711.
  2. Bal, Y. (2011). The effect of competitive strategies on human resource management practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  4. Barney, J. & Hesterly, W. S. (2011). Strategic management and competitive advantage: concepts (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Bagozzi, Richard P., Youjae Yi, & Lynn W. P. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative science quarterly, 36, 421-458.
  5. Bagozzi, Richard P., & Youjae Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94.
  6. Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., & Riesenberger, J. R., (2008). International business: Strategy, management and the new realities (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Chong, V. K., Rundus, M. J., (2004). Total quality management, market competition and organizational performance. The British Accounting Review, 36, 155–172.
  7. Crocker, L., & J. Algina. (1986). Introduction to classical & modern test theory (1st ed.). Holt, Reinhart & Winston, Orlando. Cua, K. O., Mc Kone, K. E., & Schoreder, R. G. (2001). Relationship between implementation of TQM, JIT and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 675–694.
  8. Daft, R. L. (1983). Learning the craft of organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 539-546
  9. Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Management, 52, 1-20.
  10. Dow, D., Samson, D., & Ford, S. (1999). Exploding the myth: Do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and Operations Management, 8, 1-25.
  11. Eraslan, İ. H. (2008). The effects of competitive strategies on firm performance: A study in Turkish textile and apparel industry considering the mediating role of value chain activities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boğaziçi University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul.
  12. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Fuentes, M. M. F., Saez, A. C. A. & Montes, F. J. L. (2004). The impact of environmental characterist