SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul / 2024 / Sayı: 75

Individual Application to the Constitutional Court of Poland

Hatice Derya Ormanoğlu Duranlıoğlu(ANADOLU UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF LAW, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LAW, DEPARTMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW)0000-0003-1568-7100
Pages
33–52
Publication Date
2025-01-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reasons for choosing Poland in this study include the fact that the Constitutional Court was established in Poland before the collapse of the Eastern Bloc; that it sets an example for other Eastern European countries; and that legal regulations can also be subject to individual application.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Constitutional Court was established in Poland in 1985, a country that adopted the European model constitutional justice system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individual application to the Constitutional Court (Constitutional complaint), which is an important mechanism in the protection of individual rights and freedoms and also ensures the development of the Constitutional Court jurisprudence, was made possible for the first time in Poland with the Constitution that came into force in 1997.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reasons for choosing Poland in this study include the fact that the Constitutional Court was established in Poland before the collapse of the Eastern Bloc; that it sets an example for other Eastern European countries; and that legal regulations can also be subject to individual application.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Polish Constitutional Court · Individual Application · Constitutional Review

Abstract

The Constitutional Court was established in Poland in 1985, a country that adopted the European model constitutional justice system. Individual application to the Constitutional Court (Constitutional complaint), which is an important mechanism in the protection of individual rights and freedoms and also ensures the development of the Constitutional Court jurisprudence, was made possible for the first time in Poland with the Constitution that came into force in 1997. The Constitutional Tribunal Act, which was adopted in the same year with the 1997 Polish Constitution, contains regulations regarding individual application. Because of the judicial reforms carried out in 2016, the Constitutional Tribunal Act Law was changed. The Act of Organisation of the Constitutional Tribunal and the Mode of Proceedings Before the Constitutional Tribunal, which is the most recent act put into force on January 3, 2017, includes up-to-date regulations regarding individual applications. The review authority of the Polish Constitutional Court regarding individual applications differs from that in Turkey. In the Republic of Poland, when an application is made to the Constitutional Court on the grounds that fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed in the constitution have been violated, the legal regulation itself is subject to unconstitutionality review. The reasons for choosing Poland in this study include the fact that the Constitutional Court was established in Poland before the collapse of the Eastern Bloc; that it sets an example for other Eastern European countries; and that legal regulations can also be subject to individual application.

🔖

Cite This Article

Duranlıoğlu, H. D. O. (2025). Individual Application to the Constitutional Court of Poland. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, Sayı: 75, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.75.0002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Arnwine Esen S, ‘İspanya’da Amparo Başvurusu ve Türkiye’ in B. Yücel and İ. G. Şen (eds), Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne Bireysel Başvuru Hakkı Sempozyumu Anadolu University (2011). google scholar
  2. Bilgin H, ‘Polonya Yargı Sistemi Üzerine Düşünceler’ (2013) 107 Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 389-430. google scholar
  3. Bodnar A, ‘Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne Bireysel Başvuru (Doğu Avrupa Deneyimi)’ in B. Yücel and İ. G. Şen (eds), Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne Bireysel Başvuru Hakkı Sempozyumu Anadolu University (2011). google scholar
  4. Brzezinski M F and Garlicki L, ‘Judicial Review in Post-Communist Poland: The Emergence of a Rechtsstaat’ (1995) 31 (1) Stanford Journal of International Law 13-60. google scholar
  5. Cholewinski R, ‘The Protection of Human Rights in the New Polish Constitution’ (1998) 22 Fordham International Law Journal 235-291. google scholar
  6. Cole D H, ‘Poland’s 1997 Constitution in Its Historical Context’ (1998) 1 Saint Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal 1-43. google scholar
  7. Czarny P and Nalezin'ski B, ‘Law-making Activity of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal’ in Monica Florczak-Wator (ed), Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts (Routledge 2020). google scholar
  8. Erdoğan M, ‘Anayasa Mahkemeleri Önemli midir? Orta Avrupa’da Anayasa Yargısı ve Demokrasinin Pekişmesi’ (2005) 54 Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 1-22. google scholar
  9. Gardbaum S, ‘Revolutionary Constitutionalism’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 173-200. google scholar
  10. Garlicki L L, ‘The Experience of the Polish Constitutional Court’ in Wojciech Sadurski (ed), Constitutional Justice, East and West. Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in A Comparative Perspective (Kluwer Law International 2002). google scholar
  11. Gönenç L, Prospects for Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Countries (Kluwer Law International 2002). google scholar
  12. Gözler K, Türk Anayasa Hukuku (Ekin Yayınevi 2019). google scholar
  13. Göztepe E, ‘Türkiye’de Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne Bireysel Başvuru Hakkının (Anayasa Şikâyeti) 6216 Sayılı Kanun Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi’ (2011) 95 Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 13-40. google scholar
  14. Holzinger G, ‘Avusturya Anayasa Hukukunda Anayasa Şikâyeti ve Bireysel Başvuru’ (2009) 26 Anayasa Yargısı 61-79. google scholar
  15. Höbel S, ‘Polish and German Constitutional Jurisprudence on Matters of European Community Law: A Comparison of Constitutional Courts’ Approaches’ (2007) 3 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 515-531. google scholar
  16. İba Ş and Kılıç A, Anayasa Yargısı Dersleri (Turhan Kitabevi 2022). google scholar
  17. Jamroz L, ‘The Right To Constitutional Complaint In Poland’ in Anna Budnik (ed), Locus Standi Across Legal Cultures (Temida 2015). google scholar
  18. Kılınç B, ‘Karşılaştırmalı Anayasa Yargısında Bireysel Başvuru (Anayasa Şikâyeti) Kurumu ve Türkiye Açısından Uygulanabilirliği’, (2008) 24 Anayasa Yargısı 17-57. google scholar
  19. Klopocka M G and Krzywon A, ‘On The Right Of Public Law Entities To Lodge A Constitutional Complaint In The Light Of The Jurisprudence Of The Polish Constitutional Tribunal’ (2016) 6 Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 45-64. google scholar
  20. Kosar D and Ourednickova S, ‘Responsive Judicial Review “Light” in Central and Eastern Europe - A New Sheriff in Town?’ (2023) 48 Review of Central and East European Law 445-472. google scholar
  21. Ludwikowski R R, ‘Two Firsts: A Comparative Study of the American and the Polish Constitutions’ (1987) 8 Michigan Journal of International Law 117-156. google scholar
  22. Onar E, Kanunların Anayasaya Uygunluğunun Siyasal ve Yargısal Denetimi ve Yargısal Denetim Alanında Ülkemizde Öncüler (2003). google scholar
  23. Özbudun E, Demokrasiye Geçiş Sürecinde Anayasa Yapımı (Bilgi Yayınevi,1993). google scholar
  24. Prochazka R, ‘Polonya, Çek Cumhuriyeti ve Slovak Cumhuriyetinde Anayasa Yargısı’ in Ozan Ergül (ed), Democracy and Judiciary (Türkiye Barolar Birliği 2005). google scholar
  25. Radziewicz P, ‘Judicial Change to the Law in-Action of Constitutional Review of Statutes in Poland’ (2022) 18 (1) Utrecht Law Review 29-44. google scholar
  26. Sabuncu Y and Esen Arnwine S, ‘Türkiye İçin Anayasa Şikâyeti Modeli Türkiye’de Bireysel Başvuru Yolu’ (2004) 21 Anayasa Yargısı 229-246. google scholar
  27. Sadurski W, Rights Before Courts-A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Springer 2005). google scholar
  28. Schwartz H, The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post- Communist Europe (The University of Chicago Press, 2000). google scholar
  29. Szwed M, ‘The Polish Constitutional Tribunal Crisis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights’ ECtHR 7 May 2021, No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland (2022) 18 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 132-154. google scholar
  30. Teziç E, Anayasa Hukuku (Beta Yayınevi 2019). google scholar
  31. Tuleja P, ‘The Polish Constitutional Tribunal’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions (Oxford University Press 2020). google scholar
  32. Vanberg G, ‘Abstract Juicial Review, Legislative Bargaining, And Policy Compromise’ (1998) 10 (3) Journal of Theoretical Politics 299-326. google scholar
  33. Yücel B, ‘Yarı-Başkanlık Sisteminin Hükümet Modeli Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma: Fransa Modeli Ve Komünizm Sonrası Polonya’, (2003) 52 Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 335-364. google scholar accessed 25th December 2023 google scholar
  34. The Act of 30 November 2016 on the Organisation of the Constitutional Tribunal and the Mode of Proceedings Before the Constitutional Tribunal, [Published in the Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland on 19 December 2016, item 2072] google scholar
  35. accessed 2nd January 2023 google scholar