Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2

The Power of Experience: Utilizing Former Homelessness as a Resource to Combat Homelessness

Deneyimin Gücü: Evsizlikle Mücadelede Eski Evsizliği Bir Kaynak Olarak Değerlendirmek

Hakan Karaman(Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Sosyal Hizmet Bölümü)0000-0002-5729-6012
Pages
419–448
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Against these risks, it is recommended that former homelessness be evaluated not only in relation to moving to shelter but also in relation to psychosocial recovery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary aim of this study is to evaluate how the experience of former homelessness can be considered a resource in the field of combating homelessness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In-depth interviews were conducted with 11 participants who work voluntarily or professionally in the field of homelessness within the scope of the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Against these risks, it is recommended that former homelessness be evaluated not only in relation to moving to shelter but also in relation to psychosocial recovery.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Evsizlik · Evsizlikle mücadele · Eski evsiz

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate how the experience of former homelessness can be considered a resource in the field of combating homelessness. The research was conducted according to a qualitative research design. In-depth interviews were conducted with 11 participants who work voluntarily or professionally in the field of homelessness within the scope of the research. The data obtained were interpreted thematically. The obtained data indicated that former homeless people are well acquainted with street life in terms of needs and relationships and have strong communication skills that can be used in street work. It was emphasized that as a result of these skills, former homeless people can fulfill roles such as guiding, creating motivation, effective communication and providing trust for homeless people. On the other hand, it was determined that this process may also contain risks such as traumatization, inability to control the desire to help, putting oneself forward in services and abusing the homeless and homelessness. Against these risks, it is recommended that former homelessness be evaluated not only in relation to moving to shelter but also in relation to psychosocial recovery. In addition, it is recommended that former homeless people be prepared in terms of psychological resilience, communication skills and crisis management before going out into the field, and it was deemed necessary to provide continuous support to the former homeless during the process. Also it has been determined that former homeless people can contribute to those working in this field as consultants and take effective roles in awareness activities aimed at society, in addition to being directly on the streets. As a result, it is thought that utilizing the natural experience provided by former homelessness within the framework of relevant suggestions will make a unique contribution to the fight against homelessness.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, evsizlikle mücadele alanında eski evsizliğin bir kaynak olarak nasıl ele alınabileceğini değerlendirmektir. Nitel araştırma yöntemine göre tasarlanan bu araştırmada fenomenolojik desen tercih edilmiştir. Bu doğrultuda evsizlik alanında gönüllü veya profesyonel çalışma tecrübesine sahip 11 katılımcı ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz aracılığı ile yorumlanarak dört tema altında okuyucuya sunulmuştur. Ulaşılan verilerde eski evsizlerin, ihtiyaçlar ve ilişkiler yönünden sokak yaşamını iyi tanıdığı ve sokak çalışmalarında kullanılabilecek güçlü iletişim becerilerine sahip olduğu aktarılmıştır. Bu beceriler neticesinde eski evsizlerin sokaktaki evsizlere rehberlik etme, motivasyon oluşturma, etkili iletişim ve güven sağlama gibi rolleri yerine getirebileceği vurgulanmıştır. Diğer yandan bu sürecin eski evsizler açısından travmatize olma, yardım etme isteğini kontrol edememe, hizmetlerde kendini öne çıkarma, evsizi ve evsizliği istismar etme gibi riskleri de barındırabileceği belirlenmiştir. Bu risklere karşı eski evsizliğin yalnızca barınmaya geçmiş olmakla değil psikososyal iyileşme ile ilişkili olarak değerlendirilmesi önerilmektedir. Yine eski evsizlerin sahaya çıkmadan önce psikolojik sağlamlık, iletişim becerileri, kriz yönetimi gibi konularda hazırlanması önerilirken süreç içinde eski evsize yönelik sürekli bir desteğin sunulması gerekli görülmüştür. Eski evsizlerin doğrudan sokakta bulunmanın yanı sıra bu alanda çalışanlara danışman statüsünde katkı verebileceği ve topluma yönelik farkındalık çalışmalarında etkili roller alabileceği belirtilmiştir. Sonuç itibariyle eski evsizliğin sağladığı doğal tecrübeden ilgili öneriler çerçevesinde faydalanılmasının, evsizlikle mücadeleye özgün bir katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaman, H., *, H. K. (2024). The Power of Experience: Utilizing Former Homelessness as a Resource to Combat Homelessness. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2, 419–448. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0696

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Acar, B., Bozkafa, H., Vural, B., Önal, S., Genç, M. ve Yaman, Ö.M. (2022). Evsizliğin Nedenleri ve Deneyimleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma: Beyoğlu Örneği. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 33 (2), 339-358. google scholar
  2. Allen, M., Benjaminsen, L., O’Sullivan, E. & Pleace, N. (2020). Ending homelessness? The contrasting experience of Denmark, Finland and Ireland. Bristol: Policy Press. google scholar
  3. Baum, S. & W. Burnes. (1993). A National in Denial The Truth About Homelessness. San Francisco: Westview Pres. google scholar
  4. Bodelan, M. (2016) Street social work: essence and specificity. Science and Education, (1), 28-31. google scholar
  5. Breyer, T. (2020). Empathy, sympathy and compassion. The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotion içinde. (pp. 429-440). Routledge. google scholar
  6. Cloke, P., May, J., & Johnsen, S. (2010). Swept Up Lives?: Re-envisioning The Homeless City. Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  7. Coady, N. & Lehmann, P. (Eds.)., 2016, Theoretical Perspectives For Direct Social Work Practice: A Generalist-Eclectic Approach. Springer. google scholar
  8. Crane, M., Warnes, A. M. & Fu, R. (2006). Developing homelessness prevention practice: Combining research evidence and professional knowledge. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14 (2), 156-166. google scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W., 2021, Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma ve Araştırma Deseni (6. Baskı), (çev. Demir ve Bütün), Ankara: Siyasal kitabevi. google scholar
  10. Culhane, D. P. (2008). The cost of homelessness: A perspective from the United States. European Journal of Homelessness, 2, 97-114. google scholar
  11. Dordick, G. A. (2002). Recovering from homelessness: Determining the “quality of sobriety” in a transitional housing program. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 7-32. google scholar
  12. Downer, R. T. (2013). Homelessness and its consequences: The impact on children’s psychological well-being. Routledge. google scholar
  13. Dowling, M. (2006). Approaches to Reflexivity in Qualitative Eesearch. Nurse Researcher, 13(3), 7-21. google scholar
  14. Erickson, J. R., Stevens, S., McKnight, P., & Figueredo, A. J. (1996). Willingness for treatment as a predictor of retention and outcomes. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 14(4), 135-150. google scholar
  15. Ersin, İ. ve Baş, H. (2021). İstanbul’da Yaşayan Evsizlerin Sosyoekonomik Durumları, Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri: Fatih İlçesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Maruf İktisat İslam İktisadı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), s.41-67. google scholar
  16. Fitzpatrick, S. (2005). Explaining homelessness: A critical realist perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 22(1), 1-17. google scholar
  17. Flatau, P., Zaretzky, K., Brady, M., Haigh, Y. & Martin, R. (2013). The cost of homelessness and the net benefit of homelessness programs: A national study. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Retrieved From: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/sites/default/files/migration/documents/ AHURI_Final_Report_No218_The-cost-of-homelessness-and-the-net-benefit-of-homelessness-programs-a-national-study.pdf google scholar
  18. Gaetz, S., Gulliver, T., & Richter, T. (2014). The State of Homelessness in Canada 2014. Canadian Homelessness Research Network. Retrieved From: https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/ bitstream/10315/29368/1/SOHC2014.pdf google scholar
  19. Gerzi, S. (2005). Trauma, narcissism and the two attractors in trauma. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(4), 1033-1050. google scholar
  20. Gilbert, R. (2001). Doing More for Those Made Homeless by Natural Disasters, World Bank, Disaster Management Facility, Washington, DC. google scholar
  21. Goodman, L. A., Saxe, L., & Harvey, M. (1991). Homelessness as psychological trauma: Broadening perspectives. American Psychologist, 46(11), 1219. google scholar
  22. Gürel, M. (2024). Mekânsızlar: Evsizlik, Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. google scholar
  23. Hâkansson, J. (2003). Exploring the phenomenon of empathy (Doctoral Dissertion, Stockholm University, Department of Psychology). Retrieved From: https://www.atu.dk/sites/default/files/ aktiviteter/empathy_dissertation.pdf google scholar
  24. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. google scholar
  25. Hope, M. & J. Young (1986). The Faces of Homelessness. Lexington: Lexington Books. google scholar
  26. International Network of Social Street Workers, (2008). International Guide on the Methodology of Street Work Throughout the World. Bruxelles: Dynamo international. google scholar
  27. Johnson, G., & Chamberlain, C. (2011). Are the homeless mentally ill? Australian Journal of Social Issues. 46(1), 29-48. google scholar
  28. Karaman, H. (2024). Sokağa Ulaşmanın Metodolojisi: Sosyal Hizmet Teorisinden Sokak Çalışması. Sosyal Sağlık Dergisi. 4(2). google scholar
  29. Klop, H. T., Evenblij, K., Gootjes, J. R., de Veer, A. J., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2018). Care avoidance among homeless people and access to care: an interview study among spiritual caregivers, street pastors, homeless outreach workers and formerly homeless people. BMC Public Health, 18, 1-12. google scholar
  30. Kuo G. (2019). Yet another emerging global crisis - Homelessness. The Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere. Retrieved From: https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/yet-another-emerging-global-crisis-homelessness/ google scholar
  31. Kümbetoğlu, B. (2015). Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları. google scholar
  32. Lavella, L. A. (2004). Time perspective and hope among the current homeless and former homeless. (Doctoral Thesis, Adler University). google scholar
  33. Levicka, K., Zakova, M., & Stryckova, D. (2015). Identity of Street Workers Working with Drug Users and Sexworkers in Slovakia. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional 7(2). google scholar
  34. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. google scholar
  35. McNaughton, C. (2008). Transition Through Homelessness:Lives on the Edge. UK: Palgrav Macmillan. google scholar
  36. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide To Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  37. Merriam, S.B. (2018). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber, (çev. Selahattin Turan). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. google scholar
  38. Morrell-Bellai, T., Goering, P., & Katherine, B. (2000). Becoming and remaining homeless: A qualitative investigation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 21(6), 581-604. google scholar
  39. Morris, D., & Gordon, J. (2006). The Role of the Emergency Department in the Care of Homeless and Disadvantaged Populations. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 24: 839-848. google scholar
  40. Moxley, D. P., Washington, O. G., & McElhaney, J. (2012). “I don’t have a home:” Helping Homeless People Through Faith, Spirituality, and Compassionate Service. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 431-449. google scholar
  41. Nies, M A. & McEwen, M. (2001). Community Health Nursing:Promoting The Health of Populations (3rd ed.) USA: W B. Saunders Company google scholar
  42. O’Connel., J., J. (2004). Dying in the Shadows: the Challenge of Providing Health Care of Homeless People. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 170(8). 1251-1252. google scholar
  43. Palaganas, E. C., Sanchez, M. C., Molintas, M. V. P., & Caricativo, R. D. (2017). Reflexivity in Qualitative Research: A Journey of Learning. The Qualitative Report. 22(2). 426-438. google scholar
  44. Piechowicz, M., Piotrowski, A., & Pastwa-Wojciechowska, B. (2014). The social rehabilitation of homeless women with children. Acta Neuropsychologica, 12(4). google scholar
  45. Pleace, N. (2011). The ambiguities, limits and risks of Housing First from a European perspective. European Journal of Homelessness, 5(2). google scholar
  46. Plumb, J. D. (2000). Homelessness: Reducing health disparities. Canadian Medical Association Journal,163 (2), 172- 173. google scholar
  47. Potter, N., N. (2006). What is manipulative behavior, anyway? Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(2), 139-156. google scholar
  48. Punch, K.F. (2005). Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş. (çev. ed. Zeliha Etöz) Ankara: Siyasal Kitap. google scholar
  49. Puusepp, V. (2023). Becoming closer to one another: Shared emotions and social relationships. Philosophical Psychology, 1-27. google scholar
  50. Ravenhill, M. (2016). The Culture of Homelessness. Routledge. google scholar
  51. Rocha, C., Johnson, A. K., McChesney, K. Y., & Butterfield, W. H (1996) Predictors of Housing for Sheltered Homeless Families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services.17(4) 43-56. google scholar
  52. Rossi, P. (1989) Without Shelter: Homelessness in The 1980. New York: Priority Pres. google scholar
  53. Shlay, A. B. (1994). Running on empty: Monitoring the lives and circumstances of formerly homeless families with children. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 3(2), 135-162. google scholar
  54. Simmel, G. (2009). Bireysellik ve Kültür (çev. Tuncay Birkan), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  55. Somerville, P. (2013). Understanding homelessness. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(4), 384-415. google scholar
  56. Speak, S. & Tipple, G. (2007). Housing and Homelessness in Developing Nations. D. Levinson & M. Ross (ed.), Homelessness Handbook içinde, (s. 374-383). USA: Berkshire. google scholar
  57. Susser, E., Valencia, E., Conover, S., Felix, A., Tsai, W. Y., & Wyatt, R. J. (1997). Preventing recurrent homelessness among mentally ill men: a” critical time” intervention after discharge from a shelter. American Journal of Public Health, 87(2), 256-262. google scholar
  58. Szeintuch, S. (2015). Street work and outreach: A social work method? The British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1923-1934. google scholar
  59. Tsemberis, S. (2010). Housing First: Ending Homelessness, Promoting Recovery And Reducing Costs. Ellen, I, G. & O’Flaherty, B. (ed.). How to house the homeless içinde, (s. 37-56). New York: Russel Sage Foundation. google scholar
  60. Van Doorn, L. (2010). Perceptions of time and space of (formerly) homeless people. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 20(2), 218-238. google scholar
  61. Vasylenko, O., Grach, Y., Gudz, T., Romanovska, L., & Kravchyna, T., (2019) Analysis of the formation of personal and professional qualities of future social workers for street social work. Revista Româneasca pentru Educafie Multidimensionala.11(4), 288-303. google scholar
  62. Velasquez, C. S. (2019). Former Homeless Heads of Households’ Experience of Being Homeless (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). Retrieved From: https://www.proquest.com/ docview/2229333053?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20 &%20Theses google scholar
  63. Watson, J., & Cuervo, H. (2017). Youth homelessness: A social justice approach. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 461-475. google scholar
  64. Yeter, A. (2018). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarının evsizlere yönelik hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesi: İstanbul örneği. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(17), 34-60. google scholar
  65. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 11. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Kitabevi. google scholar