SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2026 / Volume: 43 Issue: 3-4

DOKU DÜZENLEYİCİLERİN FONKSİYONEL ÖLÇÜ MADDESİ OLARAK KULLANIMI

Burcu Aktaş
Gülsüm Ceylan
Emre Mumcu
Özge Aksüzek
Fatma Ünalan
Pages
—
Publication Date
2012-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

Aktaş, B., Ceylan, G., Mumcu, E., Aksüzek, Ö., Ünalan, F. (2012). DOKU DÜZENLEYİCİLERİN FONKSİYONEL ÖLÇÜ MADDESİ OLARAK KULLANIMI. European Oral Research, Volume: 43 Issue: 3-4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1255224

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Ç a l ı k k o c a o ğ l u S. Tam Protezler. 3. B a s k ı. İstanbul: Teknografik M a t b a a c ı l a r. 1998: 154, 166-167, 610-613.
  2. Starcke E N, Marcroft K R. Fischer T E and Sweeney W T. Physical properties o f tissue conditioning materials as used in functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1972: 27: 111ı 119.
  3. The Glossary o f Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent,'2005: 94 (1): 10-92.
  4. Craig R. Restorative denial materials, tenth Edition. C.V. Mosby 2000.
  5. Chase W W. Tissue conditioning using dynamic adaptive stress.1 Prosthet Dent, 1961: 11: 804.
  6. McCarthy JA, Moser M S. Mechanical properties o f tissue conditioners. Part 1: Theoretical considerations, behavioral characteristics and tensile properties. J Prosthet Dent, 1978: 40: 89-97.
  7. A l o u l R K. Shen C. The influence o f plasticizer loss on the viscoelasticity o f temporary sol) liners. J Prosthodont, 2002: 11 (4): 254-62.
  8. Ö z k a n Y K. Y u m u ş a k astar materyalleri ve k l i n i k u y g u l a m a l a r ı. http://www.ido.org.tr /dergiarsivl02.asp?ID = 1393 2005.
  9. Murata H. Hong G, L i Y A. Hamada T. Compatibility o f tissue conditioners and dental stones: effects o f surface roughness.1 Prosthet Dent. 2005: 93: 274-281.
  10. Murata I I. Kawamura M, Hamata T, Saleh S. Kresnoadi LI, T o k i K. Dimensional stability and weight changes o f tissue conditioners.1 Oral Rehabil, 2 0 0 İ: 28: 918-923.
  11. Murata I I. Narasaki Y. Ilamada T, McCabe.IE. A n alcohol-free tissue conditioner- a laboratory evaluation.1 Dent. 2006: 34: 307-315.
  12. Braden M. Tissue Conditioners: Composition and Structure. J Dent Res, 1970: 49: 145-14S. 112
  13. McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Tissue conditioning and functional impression materials and techniques. Dent C l i n N o r t h A m, 1984: 4: 239ı 251.
  14. Chander S, H i l l M, Moore D, M o r r o w L.Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2007: 15(2): 67-71.
  15. W i l l i a m J O ' B r i e n. Dental Materials and their selection. 3. Ed. Canada: Quintessence books, 2002, p. 87.
  16. Graham BS, Jones D \ V. Sutovv EJ. Clinical implications o f resilient denture lining material research. Part IE Gelation and f l o w properties o f tissue conditioners. J Prosthet Dent, 1991: 65:413-418.
  17. McCabe JF, Walls AVVG. A p p l i e d Dental Materials. 8th edn. Oxford: Blaekwell Science Ltd. 1998, p. 108-1 14.
  18. Murata H, Hamada T, Harshini, T o k i K, Nikawa H. Effect o f addition o f ethyl alcohol on gelation and viscoelasticity o f tissue conditioners. J Oral Rehabil, 2 0 0 1: 28: 48-54.
  19. Shigeto N, Hamada T, Iwanaga H, Murata H. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part I: the influence o f the height o f residue ridge. Int J Prosthodont, 1995: 8: 490-495.
  20. Shigeto N, Hamada T, Iwanaga H, Murata H. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part I I: The influence o f the powder particle size and the liquid ethanol content Int J Prostohodont, 1995: 8: 557-563.
  21. Ş a k a r O, A t e ş M, B e y l i M S. D o k u d ü z e n l e y i c i l e r i n zamana bağlı çizgisel boyutsal d e ğ i ş i m l e r i. A k a d e m i k Dental, 1999: 1 (1): 1-5.
  22. W i l s o n HJ, T o m l i n H R, Osborne J. Tissue conditioning and functional impression material. Br Dent J, 1966: 121: 9-16.
  23. Aktas I., Ceylan C, Mumcu E. Aksüzek ()., Onulan F.
  24. W i l s o n J. In vitro loss o f alcohol from tissue conditioners, hit.1 Prosthodont, 1992: 5: 17-21.
  25. Earrel D.I. Tissue conditioning and tissue conditioners. Dent C l i n North A m, 1975: 19: 2: 255-26S.
  26. Graham BS, Jones D W, Sutow EJ. Clinical implications o f resilient denture lining material research. Part I: Flexibility and elasticity. J Prosthet Dent. 1989: 62: 42l'-428.
  27. Razek M K A. Assesment o f tissue conditioning materials for functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1979: 42: 376-380.
  28. Pissiotis A, Panagiotouni E, Sofou A, Diakoyanni I, Koloyannides A. Dimensional stability and reproduction o f surface detail o f tissue conditioning materials. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent, 1994: 3: 55-59.
  29. M c C a r t h y JA. Mechanical properties o f tissue conditioners. Part I I: Creep charasteristics. J Prosthet Dent, 1978: 40: 334-342.
  30. Kawano F, Tada N, Nagao K. Matsumoto N. The influence o f soft l i n i n g materials on pressure distribution.1 Prosthet Dent, 1991: 65: 567-575.
  31. McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Undercut reproducibility o f functional impression materials (tissue conditioners). Journal o f Oral Rehabilition. 1978: 5: 287-292.
  32. Razek M A, Mohammed M. influence o f tissue conditioning materials on the oral b a c t é r i o l o g i e status oi" complete denture wears. J Prosthet Dent, 1980: 44: 137-142
  33. Panagiotounu E. Pissiotis A, Diakoyanni 1, K a - layannides A. Influence o f tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness o f dental stone and improved dental stone. Eur J Proshodont Res Dent, 1993: 2: 61-65
  34. Ç a l ı k k o c a o ğ l u S. Tam Protezler. 3. B a s k ı. İstanbul: Teknografik M a t b a a c ı l a r. 1998: 154, 166-167, 610-613.
  35. Starcke E N, Marcroft K R. Fischer T E and Sweeney W T. Physical properties o f tissue conditioning materials as used in functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1972: 27: 111ı 119.
  36. Chase W W. Tissue conditioning using dynamic adaptive stress.1 Prosthet Dent, 1961: 11: 804.
  37. McCarthy JA, Moser M S. Mechanical properties o f tissue conditioners. Part 1: Theoretical considerations, behavioral characteristics and tensile properties. J Prosthet Dent, 1978: 40: 89-97.
  38. A l o u l R K. Shen C. The influence o f plasticizer loss on the viscoelasticity o f temporary sol) liners. J Prosthodont, 2002: 11 (4): 254-62.
  39. Ö z k a n Y K. Y u m u ş a k astar materyalleri ve k l i n i k u y g u l a m a l a r ı. http://www.ido.org.tr /dergiarsivl02.asp?ID = 1393 2005.
  40. Murata H. Hong G, L i Y A. Hamada T. Compatibility o f tissue conditioners and dental stones: effects o f surface roughness.1 Prosthet Dent. 2005: 93: 274-281.
  41. Murata I I. Kawamura M, Hamata T, Saleh S. Kresnoadi LI, T o k i K. Dimensional stability and weight changes o f tissue conditioners.1 Oral Rehabil, 2 0 0 İ: 28: 918-923.
  42. Murata I I. Narasaki Y. Ilamada T, McCabe.IE. A n alcohol-free tissue conditioner- a laboratory evaluation.1 Dent. 2006: 34: 307-315.
  43. Braden M. Tissue Conditioners: Composition and Structure. J Dent Res, 1970: 49: 145-14S. 112
  44. McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Tissue conditioning and functional impression materials and techniques. Dent C l i n N o r t h A m, 1984: 4: 239ı 251.
  45. Chander S, H i l l M, Moore D, M o r r o w L.Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2007: 15(2): 67-71.
  46. W i l l i a m J O ' B r i e n. Dental Materials and their selection. 3. Ed. Canada: Quintessence books, 2002, p. 87.
  47. Graham BS, Jones D \ V. Sutovv EJ. Clinical implications o f resilient denture lining material research. Part IE Gelation and f l o w properties o f tissue conditioners. J Prosthet Dent, 1991: 65:413-418.
  48. Murata H, Hamada T, Harshini, T o k i K, Nikawa H. Effect o f addition o f ethyl alcohol on gelation and viscoelasticity o f tissue conditioners. J Oral Rehabil, 2 0 0 1: 28: 48-54.
  49. Shigeto N, Hamada T, Iwanaga H, Murata H. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part I: the influence o f the height o f residue ridge. Int J Prosthodont, 1995: 8: 490-495.
  50. Shigeto N, Hamada T, Iwanaga H, Murata H. Pressure distribution using tissue conditioners on simplified edentulous ridge models. Part I I: The influence o f the powder particle size and the liquid ethanol content Int J Prostohodont, 1995: 8: 557-563.
  51. Ş a k a r O, A t e ş M, B e y l i M S. D o k u d ü z e n l e y i c i l e r i n zamana bağlı çizgisel boyutsal d e ğ i ş i m l e r i. A k a d e m i k Dental, 1999: 1 (1): 1-5.
  52. W i l s o n HJ, T o m l i n H R, Osborne J. Tissue conditioning and functional impression material. Br Dent J, 1966: 121: 9-16.
  53. Aktas I., Ceylan C, Mumcu E. Aksüzek ()., Onulan F.
  54. W i l s o n J. In vitro loss o f alcohol from tissue conditioners, hit.1 Prosthodont, 1992: 5: 17-21.
  55. Earrel D.I. Tissue conditioning and tissue conditioners. Dent C l i n North A m, 1975: 19: 2: 255-26S.
  56. Graham BS, Jones D W, Sutow EJ. Clinical implications o f resilient denture lining material research. Part I: Flexibility and elasticity. J Prosthet Dent. 1989: 62: 42l'-428.
  57. Razek M K A. Assesment o f tissue conditioning materials for functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1979: 42: 376-380.
  58. Pissiotis A, Panagiotouni E, Sofou A, Diakoyanni I, Koloyannides A. Dimensional stability and reproduction o f surface detail o f tissue conditioning materials. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent, 1994: 3: 55-59.
  59. M c C a r t h y JA. Mechanical properties o f tissue conditioners. Part I I: Creep charasteristics. J Prosthet Dent, 1978: 40: 334-342.
  60. Kawano F, Tada N, Nagao K. Matsumoto N. The influence o f soft l i n i n g materials on pressure distribution.1 Prosthet Dent, 1991: 65: 567-575.
  61. Razek M A, Mohammed M. influence o f tissue conditioning materials on the oral b a c t é r i o l o g i e status oi" complete denture wears. J Prosthet Dent, 1980: 44: 137-142
  62. Panagiotounu E. Pissiotis A, Diakoyanni 1, K a - layannides A. Influence o f tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness o f dental stone and improved dental stone. Eur J Proshodont Res Dent, 1993: 2: 61-65