Journals / European Oral Research / 2026 / Volume: 49 Issue: 1

SHOULD THE TEETH IN THE LINE OF JAW FRACTURES BE EXTRACTED?

Kırık Hattındaki Dişler Çekilmeli mi?

Pages
—
Publication Date
2015-03-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to establish a guideline on assessing whether to retain or extract the teeth in the fracture line.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fractures in the jaw bones could present themselves differently according to the strength of the force and the bone’s ability to absorb the impact.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The location and type of the fracture is important as well as the cause of the fracture (traffic accidents, melee trauma, pathologic changes).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to establish a guideline on assessing whether to retain or extract the teeth in the fracture line.
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mandibular fracture · teeth in the line of fracture · healing complications

Abstract

Fractures in the jaw bones could present themselves differently according to the strength of the force and the bone’s ability to absorb the impact. The location and type of the fracture is important as well as the cause of the fracture (traffic accidents, melee trauma, pathologic changes). Pre-existing pathologic lesions, position of the teeth and the way they are affected by the fracture have a great influence on the prognosis. Whether to extract the teeth in the line of a fracture has always been controversial among dentists. While some researchers advocate that such teeth should be extracted to avoid complications, others believe that retaining these teeth would benefit the patient more. Most clinicians prefer to treat their patients depending on their own previous experiences. This article aims to establish a guideline on assessing whether to retain or extract the teeth in the fracture line.

Özet

Çenelerde görülen kırıklar, kırığa sebep olan kuvvetin şiddetine ve kemiğin bu kuvveti ne kadar absorbe edebildiğine göre değişik tiplerde ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Kırığın yeri ve tipinin yanı sıra kırığa sebep olan olay da (trafik kazası, kavga, patolojik değişikler) önemlidir. Önceden varolan patolojik lezyonlar, dişlerin posizyonu ve kırıktan etkilenme şekilleri prognozu önemli derecede etkilemektedir. Kırık hattında kalan bu dişlerin çekilip çekilmemesi gerektiği diş hekimleri arasında her zaman tartışmalı bir konu olmuştur. Bazı araştırmacılar oluşabilecek komplikasyonları engellemek için dişlerin çekilmesi gerektiğini savunurken, bazıları ise bu dişleri ağızda bırakmanın hasta açısından daha yararlı olduğunu savunmaktadırlar. Ancak çoğu klinisyen tedavi planlamasını kendi geçmiş tecrübelerine dayanarak oluşturmaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı klinisyenlere yönelik kırık hattındaki dişlerin çekimi hakkında belli bir protokol oluşturmaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

Tayşi, M., Yıldırım, S. (2015). SHOULD THE TEETH IN THE LINE OF JAW FRACTURES BE EXTRACTED?. European Oral Research, Volume: 49 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.98462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Patrocinio LG, Patrocinio JA, Borba BH, Bonatti
  2. Bde S, Pinto LF, Vieira JV, Costa JM. Mandibular
  3. fracture: analysis of 293 patients treated in
  4. the Hospital of Clinics, Federal University
  5. of Uberlandia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol;71(5):560-565.
  6. Metin M, Sener I, Tek M. Impacted teeth and
  7. mandibular fracture. Eur J Dent 2007;1(1):18-20.
  8. Thapliyal GK, Sinha R, Menon PS, Chakranarayan
  9. A. Management of mandibular fractures. MJAFI;64(3):218-220.
  10. Kamboozia AH, Punnia-Moorthy A. The fate
  11. of teeth in mandibular fracture lines. A clinical
  12. and radiographic follow-up study. Int J Oral
  13. Maxillofac Surg 1993;22(2):97-101.
  14. Rai S, Pradhan R. Tooth in the line of fracture:
  15. its prognosis and its effects on healing. Indian J
  16. Dent Res 2011;22(3):495-496.
  17. Wolujevicz MA. Fractures of the mandible
  18. involving the impacted third molar tooth:
  19. an analysis of 47 cases. Br J Oral Surg;18(2):125-131.
  20. Luz JG, Moraes RB, D’Ávila RP, Yamamoto
  21. MK. Factors contributing to the surgical
  22. retreatment of mandibular fractures. Braz Oral
  23. Res 2013;27(3):258-265.
  24. Chrcanovic BR. Factors influencing the incidence
  25. of maxillofacial fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg;16(1):3-17.
  26. Chrcanovic BR. Teeth in the line of mandibular
  27. fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;18(1):7-24.
  28. Chuong R, Donoff RB, Guralnick WC. A
  29. retrospective analysis of 327 mandibular
  30. fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41(5):305-
  31. Samson J, John R, Jayakumar S. Teeth in the line
  32. of fracture: To retain or remove? Craniomaxillofac
  33. Trauma Reconstr 2010;3(4):177-184.
  34. Andreasen JO, Ahrensburg SS, Tsilingaridis G.
  35. Root fractures: the influence of type of healing
  36. and location of fracture on tooth survival rates
  37. an analysis of 492 cases. Dent Traumatol;28(5):404-409.
  38. Malanchuk VO, Kopchak AV. Risk factors
  39. for development of infection in patients with
  40. mandibular fractures located in the tooth-bearing
  41. area. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35(1):57-62.
  42. Ellis E 3rd. Outcomes of patients with teeth in
  43. the line of mandibular angle fractures treated
  44. with stable internal fixation. J Oral Maxillofac
  45. Surg 2002;60(8):863-865.
  46. Bobrowski AN, Sonego CL, Chagas Junior
  47. OL. Postoperative infection associated with
  48. mandibular angle fracture treatment in the
  49. presence of teeth on the fracture line: a systematic
  50. review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac
  51. Surg 2013;42(9):1041-1048.
  52. Koenig WR, Olsson AB, Pensler JM. The fate
  53. of developing teeth in facial trauma: tooth buds
  54. in the line of mandibular fractures in children.
  55. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32(5):503-505.
  56. Berg S, Pape HD. Teeth in the fracture line. Int
  57. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21(3): 145-146.
  58. Spinnato G, Alberto PL. Teeth in the line of
  59. mandibular fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg
  60. Clin North Am 2009;17(1):15-18.
  61. Gerbino G, Tarello F, Fasolis M, De Gioanni
  62. PP. Rigid fixation with teeth in the line of
  63. mandibular fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg;26(3):182-186.
  64. Iizuka T, Lindqvist C, Hallikainen D, Paukku
  65. P. Infection after rigid internal fixation of
  66. mandibular fractures: a clinical and radiologic
  67. study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49(6):585-
  68. de Amaratunga NA. The effect of teeth in the
  69. line of mandibular fractures on healing. J Oral
  70. Maxillofac Surg 1987;45(4):312-314.
  71. Neal DC, Wagner WF, Alpert B. Morbidity
  72. associated with teeth in the line of mandibular
  73. fractures. J Oral Surg 1978;36(11):859-862.
  74. Suei Y, Mallick PC, Nagasaki T, Taguchi A, Fujita
  75. M, Tanimoto K. Radiographic evaluation of the
  76. fate of developing tooth buds on the fracture line
  77. of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg;64(1):94-99.