SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2015 / Volume: 49 Issue: 3

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT SHRINKAGE IN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIMENSIONS

clınıcal EValUaTıOn OF FREE GınGıVal GRaFT SHRınKaGE ın HORıZOnTal anD VERTıcal DıMEnSıOnS Serbest Dişeti Greftinin Yatay ve Dikey Boyutlardaki Büzülmesinin Klinik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Emine Çifçibaşı
Volkan Karabey
Cenker Koyuncuoğlu
Ezgi Düzağaç
Emrah Genceli
Kamber Kasalı
Serdar Çintan
Pages
—
Publication Date
2015-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the different dimensional changes observed in individual level deserve further research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To assess the shrinkage of Free Gingival Graft (FGG) in horizontal and vertical dimensions and calculate the changes in the surface area of the transplanted tissue in a 3 months period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 30 FGG were placed aiming to increase attached gingiva around recession sites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the different dimensional changes observed in individual level deserve further research.
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Free gingival graft · shrinkage · surface area

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the shrinkage of Free Gingival Graft (FGG) in horizontal and vertical dimensions and calculate the changes in the surface area of the transplanted tissue in a 3 months period. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 FGG were placed aiming to increase attached gingiva around recession sites. Vertical recessions, horizontal recessions, surface area, plaque index, gingival index, periodontal probing depth and clinical attachment level were assesed at baseline, 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Results: Graft shrinkage between baseline and 1 month was more evident than 1 to 3 months in either dimensions. Both horizontal and vertical dimensions were significantly decreased (p<0.001) at 1 and 3 months post operatively. There was no significant change in PI and GI scores postoperatively compared to baseline (p>0.05). . Conclusion: The shrinkage of vertical and horizontal dimensions of the grafts were almost equal unlike the literature. In addition, the different dimensional changes observed in individual level deserve further research.

Özet

Amaç: Serbest Dişeti Grefti (SDG) operasyonu sonrası ilk 3 aylık süre zarfında meydana gelebilecek horizontal ve vertikal büzülmenin değerlendirilmesi, ayrıca toplam yüzey alanındaki değişimin hesaplanmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Dişeti çekilmesi olan bölgelerde keratinize dişeti dikey boyutunu artırmak amacıyla 30 adet SDG yerleştirilmiştir. Başlangıç ve operasyon sonrası 1. ve 3. aylarda dikey yöndeki dişeti çekilmesi, yatay yöndeki dişeti çekilmesi, greftin toplam yüzey alanı, plak indeksi (PI), gingival indeks (GI), periodontal sondalama derinliği ve klinik ataşman seviyesi ölçülmüştür. Bulgular: Birinci ve 3. aylar arasında meydana gelen büzülmeye oranla, başlangıç ve 1. ay arasında daha belirgin greft büzülmesi gözlenmiştir. Horizontal ve vertikal greft boyutları 1. ve 3. aylarda anlamlı oranda azalmıştır (p 0.05). Sonuç: Greft boyutlarında meydana gelen büzülmedeki bireysel farklılıklar daha ileri düzeyde araştırılmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

Çifçibaşı, E., Karabey, V., Koyuncuoğlu, C., Düzağaç, E., Genceli, E., Kasalı, K., Çintan, S. (2015). CLINICAL EVALUATION OF FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT SHRINKAGE IN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIMENSIONS. European Oral Research, Volume: 49 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.58759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (68)

  1. Armitage GC. Development of a classification
  2. system for periodontal diseases and conditions.
  3. Ann Periodontol 1999;4(1):1-6.
  4. CL. N. Repositioning the attached gingiva. J
  5. Periodontol 1954;25(1):38-39.
  6. Lang NP, Loe H. The relationship between the
  7. width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health.
  8. J Periodontol 1972;43(10):623-627.
  9. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal
  10. evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A
  11. four year report. J Periodontol 1982;53(6):349-
  12. Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. Role of attached gingiva
  13. for maintenance of periodontal health. Healing
  14. following excisional and grafting procedures in
  15. dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10(2):206-221.
  16. H. B. Free transplantation of gingiva propria.
  17. Swed Dent J 1963;22(684-689.
  18. Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Cortellini P,
  19. Pini Prato G. Free gingival grafts to increase
  20. keratinized tissue: A retrospective long-term
  21. evaluation (10 to 25 years) of outcomes. J
  22. Periodontol 2008;79(4):587-594.
  23. Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous
  24. gingival grafts. I. Principles of successful
  25. grafting. Periodontics 1968;6(3):121-129.
  26. Hatipoglu H, Keceli HG, Guncu GN, Sengun D,
  27. Tozum TF. Vertical and horizontal dimensional
  28. evaluation of free gingival grafts in the anterior
  29. mandible: A case report series. Clin Oral Investig;11(2):107-113.
  30. Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Recession in sites with
  31. inadequate width of the keratinized gingiva. An
  32. experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol;11(2):95-103.
  33. Herbert F. Wolf TMHCAoDH, 1st edition.
  34. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2006. 161 p.
  35. Miller PD, Jr. A classification of marginal tissue
  36. recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent;5(2):8-13.
  37. Baker DL, Seymour GJ. The possible
  38. pathogenesis of gingival recession. A histological
  39. study of induced recession in the rat. J Clin
  40. Periodontol 1976;3(4):208-219.
  41. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in
  42. pregnancy. Ii. Correlation between oral hygiene
  43. and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand;22(121-135.
  44. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in
  45. pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta
  46. Odontol Scand 1963;21(533-551.
  47. Silva CO, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum AW, Tatakis
  48. DN. Free gingival grafts: Graft shrinkage and
  49. donor-site healing in smokers and non-smokers.
  50. J Periodontol 2010;81(5):692-701.
  51. Goldman H SS, Fox L, Cohen DW. Periodontal
  52. Therapy, 3rd edition. St. Louis: The CV. Mosby
  53. Co; 1964. 560 p.
  54. James WC, McFall WT, Jr. Placement of free
  55. gingival grafts on denuded alveolar bone.
  56. Part i: Clinical evaluations. J Periodontol;49(6):283-290.
  57. Barbosa FI, Correa DS, Zenobio EG, Costa FO,
  58. Shibli JA. Dimensional changes between free
  59. gingival grafts fixed with ethyl cyanoacrylate
  60. and silk sutures. J Int Acad Periodontol;11(2):170-176.
  61. Ward VJ. A clinical assessment of the use of
  62. the free gingival graft for correcting localized
  63. recession associated with frenal pull. J
  64. Periodontol 1974;45(2):78-83.
  65. Guncu GN KH, Ercan E, Hatipoglu H, Ilhan D,
  66. Tozum TF. Vertical and horizontal dimensional
  67. evaluation of sutureless free gingival grafts.
  68. H. B. Free transplantation of gingiva propria.