SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Convergence among European Union countries in terms of bank capital structure

Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri arasında banka sermaye yapısı açısından yakınsama

Hasan Kazak(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0699-5371
Pages
789–801
Publication Date
2024-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results have important implications for policymakers and researchers and make an important contribution to the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to reveal the convergence status of the European Union member and candidate countries in terms of the ratio of bank capital to assets, which is one of the most important indicators of the banking sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using data for the period 2005-2024, the analysis conducted with the PANIC-LM test updated by Payne et al. (2022) shows that eight of the twenty-eight countries (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, and Luxembourg) show a convergence trend.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results have important implications for policymakers and researchers and make an important contribution to the literature.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2005-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yakınsama · Bankacılık · Banka Sermayesinin Aktiflere Oranı

Abstract

The objective of this study is to reveal the convergence status of the European Union member and candidate countries in terms of the ratio of bank capital to assets, which is one of the most important indicators of the banking sector. Using data for the period 2005-2024, the analysis conducted with the PANIC-LM test updated by Payne et al. (2022) shows that eight of the twenty-eight countries (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, and Luxembourg) show a convergence trend. The study is unique in that it uses an up-to-date convergence analysis and is the first in the literature to consider EU countries in this respect. The results have important implications for policymakers and researchers and make an important contribution to the literature.

Özet

Bankacılık sektörü açısından sermaye yapısı kararları, diğer sektörlere kıyasla özsermayenin aktiflere oranının düşük olması ve bunun finansal kaldıraç üzerindeki duyarlılığı artırması nedeniyle özellikle önemlidir. Ayrıca banka sağlamlılığının bir göstergesi olması, pek çok mevzuatsal düzenlemeyle şekillendirilmiş olması, düzenleyici otoriteler, yöneticiler, derecelendirme kuruluşları ve hissedarlar açısından da önemli olması sebebiyle dikkat çekicidir. Bu önemine binaen bankaların, düzenleyici otoriteler ve derecelendirme kuruluşları tarafından belirlenen ve izlenen asgari sermaye oranını korumaları gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı bankacılık sektörünün önemli göstergelerinden birisi olan banka sermayesinin aktiflere oranı açısından Avrupa Birliği üyesi ve aday ülkelerin yakınsama durumunu ortaya koymaktır. 2005-2024 dönemi verileri kullanılarak PANIC-LM testi ile yapılan analizler, değerlendirmeye alınan yirmi sekiz ülkeden sekizinin (Avusturya, Belçika, Bulgaristan, Hırvatistan, Estonya, Finlandiya, Letonya ve Lüksemburg) birbirine yakınsama eğilimi gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Çalışma güncel bir yakınsama analizi kullanılması ve literatürde ilk defa bu açıdan AB ülkelerinin ele alınması sebebiyle literatürdeki önemli bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Ortaya konulan sonuçlar politika yapıcılar ve araştırmacılar açısından yol gösterici önemli bulgular içermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kazak, H. (2024). Convergence among European Union countries in terms of bank capital structure. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 789–801. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1464698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Abbas, F., Yousaf, I., Ali, S., & Wong, W.-K. (2021). Bank Capital Buffer and Economic Growth: New Insights from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040142
  2. Ahmed, A. D. (2010). Financial liberalization, financial development and growth linkages in Sub‐Saharan African countries: An empirical investigation. Studies in Economics and Finance, 27(4), 314-339. https://doi.org/10.1108/10867371011085156
  3. Aiyar, S., Calomiris, C. W., & Wieladek, T. (2014). Does Macro-Prudential Regulation Leak? Evidence from a UK Policy Experiment. İçinde Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (C. 46, Sayı s1, ss. 181-214). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jmcb.12086
  4. Aiyar, S., Calomiris, C. W., & Wieladek, T. (2016). How does credit supply respond to monetary policy and bank minimum capital requirements? European Economic Review, 82, 142-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.07.021
  5. Akhmedjonov, A., & Balci Izgi, B. (2015). If bank capital matters, then how? The effect of bank capital on profitability of Turkish banks during the recent financial crisis. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 8(1-2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2014.940988
  6. Andersen, T. B., & Tarp, F. (2003). Financial liberalization, financial development and economic growth in LDCs. Journal of International Development, 15(2), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.971
  7. Angelini, P., Clerc, L., Cúrdia, V., Gambacorta, L., Gerali, A., Locarno, A., Motto, R., Roeger, W., Van den Heuvel, S., & Vlček, J. (2015). Basel III: Long-term Impact on Economic Performance and Fluctuations. The Manchester School, 83(2), 217-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12056
  8. Apergis, N., Christou, C., & Miller, S. (2012). Convergence patterns in financial development: Evidence from club convergence. Empirical Economics, 43(3), 1011-1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0522-8
  9. Badarau, C., & Roussel, C. (2022). A theoretical foundation for prudential authorities decision making. International Economics, 172, 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2022.01.003
  10. Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2002). Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models. Econometrica, 70(1), 191-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00273
  11. Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2004). A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127-1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x
  12. Basha, M., Reddy, K., Mubeen, S., Raju, K. H. H., & Jalaja, V. (2023). Does the Performance of Banking Sector Promote Economic Growth? A Time Series Analysis. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(6), 7.
  13. Bichsel, R., Lambertini, L., Mukherjee, A., & Wunderli, D. (2022). The pass-through of bank capital requirements to corporate lending spreads. Journal of Financial Stability, 58, 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100910
  14. Bouheni, F. B., & Hasnaoui, A. (2017). Cyclical behavior of the financial stability of eurozone commercial banks. Economic Modelling, 67, 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.018
  15. Bouteska, A., Büyükoğlu, B., & Ekşi, I. H. (2023). How effective are banking regulations on banking performance and risk? Evidence from selected European countries. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103604
  16. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  17. Bridges, J., Gregory, D., Nielsen, M., Pezzini, S., Radia, A., & Spaltro, M. (2014). The Impact of Capital Requirements on Bank Lending (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2388773). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388773
  18. Cernohorska, L. (2015). Impact of Financial Crisis on the Stability Banking Sectors in the Czech Republic and Great Britain. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00824-2
  19. Conti, A. M., Nobili, A., & Signoretti, F. M. (2023). Bank capital requirement shocks: A narrative perspective. European Economic Review, 151, 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104254
  20. Cuong, L. K., & Pham, H. (2021). Direct and indirect impacts of European banks’ regulation. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101738
  21. Danisman, G. O., & Tarazi, A. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and bank stability: Size, capital, and liquidity matter. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 93, 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.11.008
  22. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (1998). The Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing and Developed Countries. Staff Papers, 45(1), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867330
  23. Evans, J. J., & Haq, M. (2022). Does bank capital reduce liquidity creation? Global Finance Journal, 54, 100640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100640
  24. Fung, M. K. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Convergence or divergence? Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.08.001
  25. Garel, A., & Petit-Romec, A. (2017). Bank capital in the crisis: It’s not just how much you have but who provides it. Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.009
  26. Gopalakrishnan, B., Jacob, J., & Mohapatra, S. (2021). Risk-sensitive Basel regulations and firms’ access to credit: Direct and indirect effects. Journal of Banking & Finance, 126, 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106101
  27. Kanga, D., Murinde, V., & Soumaré, I. (2020). Capital, risk and profitability of WAEMU banks: Does bank ownership matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 114, 105814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105814
  28. Kazak, H. (2022). The Case of Turkey in Terms of COVID- 19 and Non- Performing Loans (NPL). İçinde Digital Transformation and New Approaches in Trade, Economics, Finance and Banking (ss. 97-133). Peter Lang GmbH.
  29. Kazak, H., Uluyol, B., Akcan, A. T., & İyibildiren, M. (2023). The impacts of conventional and Islamic banking sectors on real sector growth: Evidence from time-varying causality analysis for Turkiye. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(Supplement 1), S15-S29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.09.004
  30. Kitchen, R. L. (1986). Finance for the Developing Countries. Wiley.
  31. Klein, P.-O., & Turk-Ariss, R. (2022). Bank capital and economic activity. Journal of Financial Stability, 62, 101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2022.101068
  32. Lee, J., Payne, J. E., & Islam, M. T. (2021). A Survey of Econometric Approaches to Convergence Tests of Emissions and Measures of Environmental Quality. Içinde Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.668
  33. Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961
  34. Levine, R., & Zervos, S. (1998). Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, 88(3), 537-558.
  35. McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in economic development. The Brookings Institution.
  36. Mukherjee, P., Bhattacharya, P., & Roy Chowdhury, S. (2022). Financial Liberalization and Convergence of Financial Development Among BRICS Economies. Içinde P. Mukherjee (Ed.), Revisiting the Indian Financial Sector: Recent Issues and Perspectives (ss. 85-118). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7668-0_6
  37. Mukherjee, P., Roy Chowdhury, S., & Bhattacharya, P. (2021). Does financial liberalization lead to financial development? Evidence from emerging economies. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(8), 1263-1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1948589
  38. Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
  39. Nazlioglu, S., & Lee, J. (2020). Response surface estimates of the LM unit root tests. Economics Letters, 192, 109136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109136
  40. Nazlioglu, S., Lee, J., Tieslau, M., Karul, C., & You, Y. (2022). Smooth structural changes and common factors in nonstationary panel data: An analysis of healthcare expenditures†. Econometric Reviews, 42(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2022.2156740
  41. Nguyen, Q. T. T., Gan, C., & Li, Z. (2019). Bank capital regulation: How do Asian banks respond? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101196
  42. Olszak, M., Roszkowska, S., & Kowalska, I. (2017). Do Microprudential Regulations and Supervision Affect the Link Between Lending and Capital Ratio in Economic Downturns of Large Banks in the EU? PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 15(1, 2), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.66.1
  43. Payne, J. E., Lee, J., Islam, Md. T., & Nazlioglu, S. (2022). Stochastic convergence of per capita greenhouse gas emissions: New unit root tests with breaks and a factor structure. Energy Economics, 113, 106201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106201
  44. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels (SSRN Scholarly Paper 572504). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
  45. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
  46. Reichlin, L. (2014). Monetary Policy and Banks in the Euro Area: The Tale of Two Crises. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.09.012
  47. Roulet, C. (2018). Basel III: Effects of capital and liquidity regulations on European bank lending. Journal of Economics and Business, 95, 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2017.10.001
  48. Schularick, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2012). Credit Booms Gone Bust: Monetary Policy, Leverage Cycles, and Financial Crises, 1870-2008. American Economic Review, 102(2), 1029-1061. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.1029
  49. Simion, D., Stanciu, M., & Armăşelu, S. (2015). Correlation Analysis Between Structure Financial System and Economic Growth in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1332-1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01510-5
  50. Teixeira, J. C. A., Silva, F. J. F., Fernandes, A. V., & Alves, A. C. G. (2014). Banks’ capital, regulation and the financial crisis. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 28, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2014.01.002