SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar / 2024 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: Supplement 1

Measuring Emotional Reactivity: Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Versions of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS) and its Short Form (PERS-S)

Duygusal Tepkiselliğin Ölçülmesi: Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği (PDTÖ) ve Kısa Formunun (PDTÖ-KF) Türkçe Versiyonlarının Güvenilirlik ve Geçerliliği

Ceren Gökdağ(MANİSA CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9111-2811
Elif Yüvrük(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7150-4060
Rodrigo Becerra(The University of Western Australia)0000-0001-8286-7254
Pages
262–280
Publication Date
2024-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish versions of PERS and PERS-S are reliable and valid tools for measuring individual differences in emotional reactivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Individual differences in emotional reactivity are generally investigated using psychophysiological measures and self-report scales.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Participants (N=393, 73% female; for usable data) completed the PERS and other related measures including positive and negative affect, emotion dysregulation, and psychological distress symptoms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish versions of PERS and PERS-S are reliable and valid tools for measuring individual differences in emotional reactivity.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:duygu · duygusal tepkisellik · Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği

Abstract

Objective: Individual differences in emotional reactivity are generally investigated using psychophysiological measures and self-report scales. This study aimed to adapt the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS) and its short form (PERS-S), which assess individual differences in emotional reactivity to positive and negative emotions with three subscales (activation, intensity, and duration), into Turkish. Method: Participants (N=393, 73% female; for usable data) completed the PERS and other related measures including positive and negative affect, emotion dysregulation, and psychological distress symptoms. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses supported the 6-factor structure of both the PERS and PERS-S. Results also showed that the Turkish versions of the scales can be used as 6- or 2-factor scales, depending on the research interest (PERS: χ2/df = 4.15, CFI=0.9, NFI= 0.9, RMSEA= 0.09 [0.085 - 0.094]; PERS-S= χ2/df = 3.19, CFI=0.96, NFI=0.94, RMSEA= 0.075 [0.067 - 0.083]). The positive and negative emotional reactivity subscales showed satisfactory internal consistencies (all ’s > .63) and two-week test-retest reliability levels (all r’s > .62) and were correlated with emotion dysregulation, psychopathology, and positive/negative affect. Conclusion: The Turkish versions of PERS and PERS-S are reliable and valid tools for measuring individual differences in emotional reactivity.

Özet

Amaç: Duygusal tepkisellikteki bireysel farklılıklar genellikle psikofizyolojik ölçümler ve öz bildirim ölçekleri kullanılarak incelenmektedir.Bu çalışmanın amacı, pozitif ve negatif duygular için duygusal tepkiselliğin bireysel farklılıklarını üç alt ölçekle (aktivasyon, yoğunluk ve süre) değerlendiren Perth Duygusal Tepkisellik Ölçeği (PDTÖ) ve kısa formunu (PDTÖ-KF) Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Yöntem: Katılımcılar (N=393, %73 kadın; kullanılabilir veri için) PDTÖ’yü ve pozitif ve negatif duygulanım, duygu düzenlemede güçlükler ve psikolojik sıkıntı belirtileri gibi diğer ilgili ölçümleri yanıtlamıştır. Bulgular: Doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri hem PDTÖ hem de PDTÖ-KF'nin 6 faktörlü yapısını doğrulamıştır. Ayrıca, sonuçlar ölçeklerin Türkçe versiyonlarının, araştırmanın odağına bağlı olacak şekilde 6 ya da 2 faktörlü olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir (PERS: χ2/df = 4,15, CFI=0,9, NFI= 0,9, RMSEA= 0,09 [0,085 – 0,094; PERS-S= χ2/df = 3,19, CFI=0,96, NFI=0,94, RMSEA= 0,075 [0,067 – 0,083]). Pozitif ve negatif duygusal tepkisellik alt ölçeklerinden alınan puanların iç tutarlık katsayılarının tatmin edici olduğu görülmüş (all ’s > 0,63), iki haftalık test tekrar test güvenilirlik düzeyleri orta ve yüksek seviyede çıkmış (all r’s > 0,62) ve bu puanlar duygu düzenleme güçlüğü, psikopatoloji ve pozitif/negatif duygulanım ile korelasyon göstermiştir. Sonuç: PDTÖ ve PDTÖ-KF’nin Türkçe versiyonlarının duygusal tepkisellikteki bireysel farklılıkları ölçmek için güvenilir ve geçerli araçlar olduğu gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gökdağ, C., Yüvrük, E., Becerra, R., *, C. G. (2024). Measuring Emotional Reactivity: Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Versions of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS) and its Short Form (PERS-S). Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, Cilt: 16 Sayı: Supplement 1, 262–280. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1539548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Asl E, Mohammadian Y, Gharraee B, Khanjani S, Pazouki A (2020) Assessment of the emotional reactivity through the positive and negative emotions: The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci, 14:e98057.
  2. Atak H (2013) The Turkish adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Noro Psikiyatri Ars, 50:312-319.
  3. Balaban G, Bilge Y (2021) Psychometric properties of Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form in Turkish community sample. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 13:281-297.
  4. Barańczuk U (2019) The five factor model of personality and emotion regulation: A meta-analysis. Pers Individ Dif, 139:217-227.
  5. Barnhart WR, Braden AL, Jordan AK (2020) Negative and positive emotional eating uniquely interact with ease of activation, intensity, and duration of emotional reactivity to predict increased binge eating. Appetite, 151:104688.
  6. Becerra R, Campitelli G (2013) Emotional reactivity: Critical analysis and proposal of a new scale. Int J Appl Psychol, 3:161-168.
  7. Becerra R, Preece D, Campitelli G, Scott-Pillow G (2019) The assessment of emotional reactivity across negative and positive emotions: Development and validation of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale (PERS). Assessment, 26:867-879.
  8. Bianchin M, Angrilli A (2012) Gender differences in emotional responses: A psychophysiological study. Physiol Behav, 105:925-932.
  9. Bjureberg J, Ljótsson B, Tull MT, Hedman E, Sahlin H, Lundh LG et al. (2016) Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: the DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 38:284-296.
  10. Brody LR, Hall JA (2008) Gender and emotion in context. In Handbook of Emotions (Eds M Lewis, JM Haviland-Jones, L Feldman-Barrett):395-408. New York, NY, Guilford Press.
  11. Bylsma LM, Morris BH, Rottenberg J (2008) A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol Rev, 28:676-691.
  12. Carlson CR, Collins FL, Stewart JF, Porzelius J, Nitz JA, Lind CO (1989) The assessment of emotional reactivity: A scale development and validation study. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 11:313-325.
  13. Carver CS, White TL (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. J Personal Soc Psychol, 67:319-333.
  14. Cougle JR, Timpano KR, Sarawgi S, Smith CM, Fitch KE (2013) A multi-modal investigation of the roles of distress tolerance and emotional reactivity in obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Anxiety Stress Coping, 26:478-492.
  15. Dahl RE, Gunnar MR (2009) Heightened stress responsiveness and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: Implications for psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol, 21:1-6.
  16. Davidson RJ (1998) Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cogn Emot, 12:307-330.
  17. Fox E (2008) Emotion Science Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions. London, UK, Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Gençöz T (2000) Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46):19-28.
  19. Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann Jr WB (2003) A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers, 37:504-528.
  20. Gratz KL, Rosenthal MZ, Tull MT, Lejuez CW, Gunderson JG (2010) An experimental investigation of emotional reactivity and delayed emotional recovery in borderline personality disorder: The role of shame. Compr Psychiatry, 51:275-285.
  21. Gross JJ (2014) Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In Handbook of Emotion Regulation (Ed JJ Gross):3-20. New York, Guilford Press.
  22. Gross JJ, Jazaieri H (2014) Emotion, emotion regulation, and psychopathology: An affective science perspective. Clin Psychol Sci, 2:387-401.
  23. Gruber J (2019) The Oxford Handbook of Positive Emotion and Psychopathology. New York, Oxford University Press.
  24. Hamann S, Canli T (2004) Individual differences in emotion processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 14:233-238.
  25. Henry JD, Crawford JR (2005) The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol, 44:227-239.
  26. Hisler GC, Krizan Z, DeHart T, Wright AG (2020) Neuroticism as the intensity, reactivity, and variability in day-to-day affect. J Res Pers, 87:103964.
  27. Kaçar-Başaran S, Gökdağ C, Erdoğan-Yıldırım Z. Yorulmaz O (2022) A different view to perfectionism: An investigation of the psychometric properties of the big three perfectionism scale in a Turkish community sample. Curr Psychol, 41:6511-6521.
  28. Kline RB (2016) Structural Equation Modeling, 4th Ed. New York, Guilford Press.
  29. Larionov PM, Ageenkova EK, Belashina TV (2021) Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form. Neurology Neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics, 13:26-33.
  30. Larsen RJ, Ketelaar T (1989) Extraversion, neuroticism and susceptibility to positive and negative mood induction procedures. Pers Individ Diff, 10:1221-1228.
  31. Matusz PJ, Traczyk J, Sobkow A, Strelau J (2015) Individual differences in emotional reactivity moderate the strength of the relationship between attentional and implicit-memory biases towards threat-related stimuli. J Cogn Psychol (Hove), 27:715-724.
  32. Merz EL, Malcarne VL, Roesch SC, Ko CM, Emerson M, Roma VG et al. (2013) Psychometric properties of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) original and short forms in an African American community sample. J Affect Dis, 151:942-949.
  33. Moors A (2009) Theories of emotion causation: A review. Cogn Emot, 23:625-662.
  34. Nock MK, Wedig MM, Holmberg EB, Hooley JM (2008) The emotion reactivity scale: Development, evaluation, and relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Behav Ther, 39:107-116.
  35. Norris CJ, Leaf PT, Fenn KM (2019) Negativity bias in false memory: Moderation by neuroticism after a delay. Cogn Emot, 33:737-753.
  36. Preece D, Becerra R, Campitelli G (2019) Assessing emotional reactivity: Psychometric properties of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale and the development of a short form. J Pers Assess, 101:589-597.
  37. Sarıçam H (2018) The psychometric properties of Turkish version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7:19-30.
  38. Seçer İ, Halmatov S, Gençdoğan B (2013) Duygusal tepkisellik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 3:77-89.
  39. Sertel-Berk Ö (2020) Dil Uyarlamasından Psikometrik Sınamalara TüM Basamakları İle Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışmaları-1 [Webinar]. İstanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi İstatistik Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi.
  40. Şişman S (2012) Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sistemi / Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 32:1-22.
  41. Taber KS (2018) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Edu, 48:1273-1296.
  42. Thompson B (2004) Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
  43. Watson D, Clark LA (1997) Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In Handbook of Personality Psychology (Eds R Hogan, J Johnson, S Briggs):767-793. Cambridge, MA, Academic Press.
  44. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 54:1063-1070.
  45. Weiss NH, Gratz KL, Lavender JM (2015) Factor structure and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of difficulties in the regulation of positive emotions: The DERS-Positive. Behav Modif, 39:431-453.
  46. Wheeler RE, Davidson RJ, Tomarken AJ (1993) Frontal brain asymmetry and emotional reactivity: A biological substrate of affective style. Psychophysiology, 30:82-89.
  47. Widiger TA (2009) Neuroticism. In Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (Eds. MR Leary, RH Hoyle):129-146. New York, Guilford Press.
  48. Yiğit İ, Güzey Yiğit M (2019) Psychometric properties of Turkish version of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Brief Form (DERS-16). Curr Psychol, 38:1503-1511.