SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar / 2026 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4

Study Engagement in Higher Education: Conceptual Diversities, Theoretical Models, and Current Trends

Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Bağlılığı: Kavramsal Çeşitlilikler, Kuramsal Modeller ve Güncel Eğilimler

Cansu Hazal Güçlü(BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8262-2676
Pages
1195–1214
Publication Date
2026-02-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, examining the conceptual and theoretical foundations of study engagement provides an essential contribution not only to academic achievement and persistence but also to students’ psychosocial adjustment and post-graduation life satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Study engagement is defined as a positive academic disposition characterized by students’ levels of vigor, dedication, and absorption in learning processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the context of Turkish higher education, the growing number of students, increasing dropout rates, and youth unemployment have made study engagement a critical issue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, examining the conceptual and theoretical foundations of study engagement provides an essential contribution not only to academic achievement and persistence but also to students’ psychosocial adjustment and post-graduation life satisfaction.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çalışma bağlılığı · öğrenci bağlılığı · üniversite öğrencileri

Abstract

Study engagement is defined as a positive academic disposition characterized by students’ levels of vigor, dedication, and absorption in learning processes. This concept provides a key explanatory framework for understanding university students’ academic achievement, psychosocial adjustment, and satisfaction with their higher education experiences. Within the perspective of positive psychology, study engagement is conceptualized not only as observable academic behaviors but also as a holistic construct that encompasses students’ psychological investment in learning. In this review, study engagement is examined through theoretical approaches and recent empirical findings. Prominent theoretical models of student engagement are examined through four primary lenses: contextual perspectives (e.g., Tinto’s Theory of Academic and Social Integration and Stage–Environment Fit Theory), affective perspectives (e.g., Flow Theory), institutional perspectives (e.g., Student Involvement Theory), and motivational perspectives (e.g., Achievement Goal Theory and Self-Determination Theory), in addition to Kahu’s integrative holistic framework. Moreover, recent studies on momentary student engagement conceptualize engagement as a dynamic, context- and time-sensitive process rather than a stable trait. In the context of Turkish higher education, the growing number of students, increasing dropout rates, and youth unemployment have made study engagement a critical issue. Therefore, examining the conceptual and theoretical foundations of study engagement provides an essential contribution not only to academic achievement and persistence but also to students’ psychosocial adjustment and post-graduation life satisfaction.

Özet

Çalışma bağlılığı, öğrencilerin öğrenme süreçlerine yönelik enerji, adanmışlık ve yoğunlaşma düzeylerini içeren, olumlu bir akademik tutum olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu kavram, yükseköğretimde öğrencilerin akademik başarılarını, psikososyal uyumlarını ve üniversite deneyimlerinden aldıkları doyumu anlamada temel bir açıklayıcı çerçeve sunmaktadır. Pozitif psikoloji perspektifiyle birlikte çalışma bağlılığı; yalnızca gözlenebilir davranışları değil, aynı zamanda öğrencilerin öğrenme sürecine yaptıkları psikolojik yatırımı da içeren bütüncül bir yapı olarak ele alınmaktadır. Bu derlemede çalışma bağlılığı kavramı kuramsal yaklaşımlar ve güncel araştırma bulguları ışığında incelenmektedir. Alanyazında bağlılığı açıklamak için öne çıkan modeller dört başlık altında ele alınmıştır: bağlam düzeyli yaklaşımlar (Tinto’nun Akademik ve Sosyal Entegrasyon Kuramı, Dönem-Çevre Uyumu Kuramı), duygusal düzeyli yaklaşımlar (Akış Kuramı) ve kurumsal düzey yaklaşımı (Dahil Olma Kuramı) ve güdülenme düzeyi yaklaşımı (ör. Başarı Hedef Kuramı, Öz Belirleme Kuramı) ve Kahu’nun bütüncül yaklaşımı. Ayrıca son yıllarda öne çıkan anlık öğrenci bağlılığı çalışmaları, bağlılığı sabit bir özellikten ziyade bağlama ve zamana duyarlı, dinamik bir süreç olarak değerlendirmektedir. Türkiye yükseköğretim bağlamında artan öğrenci sayıları, okul terk oranları ve genç işsizliği, çalışma bağlılığını kritik bir konu haline getirmektedir. Bu nedenle çalışma bağlılığını kavramsal ve kuramsal temelleriyle incelemek, yalnızca akademik başarı ve devamlılık için değil, öğrencilerin psikososyal uyumları ve mezuniyet sonrası yaşam doyumları için de önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güçlü, C. H. (2026). Study Engagement in Higher Education: Conceptual Diversities, Theoretical Models, and Current Trends. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4, 1195–1214. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1822536

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (144)

  1. Alan AK, Kabadayi ET, Cavdar N (2018) Beyond obvious behavior patterns in universities: student engagement with the university. Research Journal of Business and Management, 5:222-230.
  2. Álvarez-Pérez PR, López-Aguilar D, González-Morales MO, Peña-Vázquez R (2024) Academic engagement and dropout intention in undergraduate university students. J Coll Stud Retent, 26:108-125.
  3. Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ (2008) Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol Sch, 45:369-386.
  4. Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, Reschly AL (2006) Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. J Sch Psychol, 44:427-445.
  5. Arnett JJ (2000) Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol, 55:469-480.
  6. Arnett JJ (Ed) (2015) The Oxford Handbook of Emerging Adulthood. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  7. Astin AW (1985) Involvement the cornerstone of excellence. Change, 17:35-39.
  8. Astin AW (1999) Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. J Coll Stud Dev, 40:518-529.
  9. Atak H, Çok F (2010) A new period in human life: Emerging adulthood. J Child Adolesc Ment Health, 17:39-50.
  10. Atik S, Çelik OT (2021) Analysis of the relationships between academic motivation, engagement, burnout and academic achievement with structural equation modelling. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8:118-130.
  11. Aypay A (2011) İlköğretim II. Kademe Öğrencileri İçin Okul Tükenmişliği Ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11:511-527.
  12. Aypay A, Sever M, Demirhan G (2012) Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ve akademik entegrasyonu: Boylamsal bir araştırma. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11:407-422.
  13. Benita M, Matos L (2021) Internalization of mastery goals: The differential effect of teachers’ autonomy support and control. Front Psychol, 11:599303.
  14. Berti S, Grazia V, Vavassori M, Molinari L (2025) Promoting active student participation in secondary schools with the ASPIRE intervention. Learn Cult Soc Interact, 53:100921.
  15. Böheim R, Symonds J (2025) Perspectives on momentary engagement and learning situated in classroom contexts. Frontline Learn Res, 13:1-9.
  16. Braxton JM, Hirschy AS, McClendon SA (2011) Understanding and Reducing College Student Departure: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol 30, No 3. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley.
  17. Bumbacco C, Scharfe E (2023) Why attachment matters: first-year post-secondary students’ experience of burnout, disengagement, and drop-out. J Coll Stud Retent, 24:988-1001.
  18. Bülbül T (2012) Yükseköğretimde okul terki: Nedenler ve çözümler. Education and Science, 37:219-235.
  19. Connell JP (1990) Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. In The Self in Transition: Infancy to Childhood (Ed D Cicchetti):61-97. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  20. Connell JP, Wellborn JG (1991) Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In Self Processes and Development (Eds MR Gunnar, LA Sroufe):43-77. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  21. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, Harper & Row.
  22. Csikszentmihalyi M (1997) Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. New York, Basic Books.
  23. Dai K, Wang Y (2025) Investigating the interplay of Chinese EFL teachers’ proactive personality, flow, and work engagement. J Multiling Multicult Dev, 46:209-223.
  24. Darr CW (2012) Measuring student engagement: The development of a scale for formative use. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (Eds SL Christenson, AL Reschly, C Wylie):707-723. New York, Springer.
  25. Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J Res Pers, 19:109-134.
  26. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq, 11:227-268.
  27. Deniz Ü (2020) Lisansüstü eğitimde gizli kriz: Öğrenciler neden okulu terk ediyor? Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 48:61-83.
  28. Doğan U (2015) Student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20:553-561.
  29. Dužević I (2015) A conceptual framework for analysing the impact of influences on student engagement and learning. Tert Educ Manag, 21:66-79.
  30. Eccles JS, Adler TF, Futterman R, Goff SB, Kaczala CM, Meece JL, Midgley C (1983) Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Achievement and Achievement Motives: Psychological and Sociological Approaches (Ed JT Spence):75-146. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman.
  31. Eccles JS, Midgley C (1989) Stage–environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In Research on Motivation in Education (Vol 3) (Eds R Ames, C Ames):139-181. New York, Academic Press.
  32. Eccles JS, Roeser RW (2009) Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology: Vol 1. Individual Bases of Adolescent Development, 3rd ed. (Eds RM Lerner, L Steinberg):404-434. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley.
  33. Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2020) From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol, 61:101859.
  34. Elliot AJ, McGregor HA (2001) A 2×2 achievement goal framework. J Pers Soc Psychol, 80:501-519.
  35. Elliot AJ, McGregor HA, Gable S (1999) Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. J Educ Psychol, 91:549-563.
  36. Engels MC, Spilt J, Denies K, Verschueren K (2021) The role of affective teacher-student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories. Learn Instr, 75:101485.
  37. Eurofound (2016) Exploring the Diversity of NEETs. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  38. Eurostat (2022) Young persons neither in employment nor in education and training by country of birth (NEET rates). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/edat_lfse_28/default/table?lang=en (Accessed 08.11.2025).
  39. Finn JD (1989) Withdrawing from school. Rev Educ Res, 59:117-142.
  40. Finn JD (1993) School Engagement and Students at Risk. Washington DC, National Center for Education Statistics.
  41. Finn JD, Rock DA (1997) Academic success among students at risk for school failure. J Appl Psychol, 82:221-234.
  42. Finn JD, Zimmer KS (2012) Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (Eds SL Christenson, AL Reschly, C Wylie):97-131. New York, Springer.
  43. Ford ME (1992) Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
  44. Ford ME, Smith PR (2007) Thriving with social purpose: An integrative approach to the development of optimal human functioning. Educ Psychol, 42:153-171.
  45. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH (2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res, 74:59-109.
  46. Frumos FV, Leonte R, Candel OS, Ciochină-Carasevici L, Ghiaţău R, Onu C (2024) The relationship between university students’ goal orientation and academic achievement. The mediating role of motivational components and the moderating role of achievement emotions. Front Psychol, 14:1296346.
  47. Gentle-Genitty CS, Keppens G, Kearney CA (2025) Perception of school social bonding (PSSB) instrument: Structural and concurrent validity. Contemp Sch Psychol, 29:213-220.
  48. Güçlü C (2022) Üniversite öğrencilerinde çalışma bağlılığı, yılmazlık, öz düzenleme ve okul tükenmişliğinin incelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi.
  49. Güngör A, Yıldırım M, Şahin S (2022) The relationship between academic stress, school burnout, and motivation among Turkish university students. Psychol Res Behav Manag,15:1887-1899.
  50. Günüç S, Artun H, Yigit E, Keser H (2022) Examining the relationship between student engagement and campus climate: a case in Turkey. J Coll Stud Ret, 23:1099-1119.
  51. Henrie CR, Halverson LR, Graham CR (2015) Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Comput Educ, 90:36-53.
  52. Hornstra L, Majoor M, Peetsma T (2017) Achievement goal profiles and developments in effort and achievement in upper elementary school. Br J Educ Psychol, 87:606-629.
  53. Jackson D, Bridgstock R (2021) What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. High Educ, 81:723-739.
  54. Jafari SG, Sharifi T, Chorami M, Ahmadi R (2024) The role of academic motivation in self-regulation, goal orientation and passion among medical students with self-handicapping behaviors. Educational Research & Medical Sciences, 13:e151408.
  55. Jang H, Kim EJ, Reeve J (2016) Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learn Instr, 43:27-38.
  56. Järvinen H, Symonds JE, Upadyaya K, Salmela-Aro K (2025) Capturing fluctuations in student engagement through experience sampling: The role of task value and classroom context. Learn Instr, 87:101765.
  57. Kahu ER (2013) Framing student engagement in higher education. Stud High Educ, 38:758-773.
  58. Kahu ER, Nelson K (2018) Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. High Educ Res Dev, 37:58-71.
  59. Kahu ER, Picton C, Nelson K (2020) Pathways to engagement: A longitudinal study of the first-year student experience in the educational interface. High Educ, 79:657-673.
  60. Kaplan A, Maehr ML (2007) The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educ Psychol Rev, 19:141-184.
  61. Kassab SE, Rathan R, Taylor DC, Hamdy H (2024) The impact of the educational environment on student engagement and academic performance in health professions education. BMC Med Educ, 24:1278.
  62. Katz-Vago I, Benita M (2024) Mastery-approach and performance-approach goals predict distinct outcomes during personal academic goal pursuit. Br J Educ Psychol, 94:309-327.
  63. Korhonen V, Ketonen E, Toom A (2024) Student engagement and its development in university education: A three-year follow-up study. Learn Individ Differ, 113:102465.
  64. Korpershoek H, Canrinus ET, Fokkens-Bruinsma M, De Boer H (2020) The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Res Pap Educ, 35:641-680.
  65. Kuh GD (2009) What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. J Coll Stud Dev, 50:683-706.
  66. Kürtül N, Efendioğlu A, Yelken TY (2021) The adaptation of student engagement scale in higher education: Student engagement scale in higher education. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13:3197-3211.
  67. Lei H, Cui Y, Zhou W (2018) Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Soc Behav Pers, 46:517-528.
  68. Li J, Xue E (2023) Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behav Sci (Basel), 13:59.
  69. Li L, Valiente C, Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Johns SK, Berger RH et al. (2022) Longitudinal relations between behavioral engagement and academic achievement: The moderating roles of socio-economic status and early achievement. J Sch Psychol, 94:15-27.
  70. Li S, Lajoie SP (2022) Cognitive engagement in self-regulated learning: an integrative model. Eur J Psychol Educ, 37:833-852.
  71. Libbey HP (2004) Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. J Sch Health, 74:274-283.
  72. Liu Y, Ma S, Chen Y (2024) The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Front Psychol, 15:1357936.
  73. Lüküslü D, Çelik K (2021) Gendering the NEET category: Young NEET women in Turkey. Turkish Studies. 23:200-222
  74. Maskell EC, Collins L (2017) Measuring student engagement in UK higher education: do surveys deliver?. J Appl Res High Educ, 9:226-241.
  75. Maslach C, Leiter MP (1997) The Truth About Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  76. Murray JL, Arnett JJ (Eds) (2018) Emerging Adulthood and Higher Education: A New Student Development Paradigm. New York, Routledge.
  77. Nelson LJ, Barry CM (2005) Distinguishing features of emerging adulthood: The role of self-classification as an adult. J Adolesc Res, 20:242-262.
  78. Nicholls JG (1984) Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol Rev, 91:328-346.
  79. Niemiec CP, Ryan RM (2009) Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory Res Educ, 7:133-144.
  80. Obeng P, Srem-Sai M, Salifu I, Amoadu M, Arthur F, Agormedah EK et al. (2025) Linking students' grit and academic engagement: Mediating role of academic motivation and self-regulated learning. Br Educ Res J, 51:2511-2535.
  81. Olson N, Oberhoffer-Fritz R, Reiner B, Schulz T (2025) Stress, student burnout and study engagement–a cross-sectional comparison of university students of different academic subjects. BMC Psychol, 13:293.
  82. Özdemir Y (2015) Ortaokul öğrencilerinde okul tükenmişliği: Ödev, okula bağlılık ve akademik motivasyonun rolü. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6:27-35.
  83. Pan X (2023) The mediating role of learning motivation between behavioral engagement and academic performance in online learning. SAGE Open, 13:21582440231205098.
  84. Papageorgiou E, Wong J, Liu Q, Khalil M, Cabo AJ (2025) A Systematic Review on Student Engagement in Undergraduate Mathematics: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Learning Outcomes. Educ Psychol Rev, 37:66.
  85. Pekrun R (2006) The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educ Psychol Rev, 18:315-341.
  86. Pekrun R, Linnenbrink-Garcia L (2012) Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (Eds SL Christenson, AL Reschly, C Wylie):259-282. New York, Springer.
  87. Pekrun R, Perry RP (2014) Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In International Handbook of Emotions in Education (Eds R Pekrun, L Linnenbrink-Garcia):120-141. London, Routledge.
  88. Porter SR (2006) Institutional structures and student engagement. Res High Educ, 47:521-558.
  89. Redmond P, Heffernan A, Abawi L, Brown A, Henderson R (2018) An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learn, 22:183-204.
  90. Reeve J (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (Eds SL Christenson, AL Reschly, C Wylie):149-172. New York, Springer.
  91. Reeve J, Cheon SH (2021) Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educ Psychol, 56:54-77.
  92. Robbins SB, Lauver K, Huyghe S (2023) Student engagement and employability: The role of self-regulated learning and motivation in early career outcomes. J Vocat Behav, 143:103845.
  93. Ross TD, Okojie FA (2023) The impact of learning communities on student engagement efforts at community colleges. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 10(2):1.
  94. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2017) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, Guilford Press.
  95. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2019) Brick by brick: the origins, development, and future of Self-Determination Theory. In Advances in Motivation Science, Vol 6 (Ed AJ Elliot):111-156. San Diego, Elsevier.
  96. Salanova M, Bakker AB, Llorens S (2006) Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. J Happiness Stud, 7:1-22.
  97. Salanova M, Llorens S, Martínez IM (2019) Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra-role performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. J Adv Nurs, 75:2809-2821.
  98. Salanova M, Schaufeli WB, Martínez I, Bresó E (2010) How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety Stress Coping, 23:53-70.
  99. Salmela-Aro K, Kiuru N, Nurmi JE (2008) The role of educational track in adolescents' school burnout: A longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol, 78:663-689.
  100. Salmela-Aro K, Upadyaya K (2012) The schoolwork engagement inventory: Energy, dedication and absorption (EDA). Eur J Psychol Assess, 28:60-67.
  101. Salmela-Aro K, Upadyaya K (2014) School burnout and engagement in the context of demands–resources model. Br J Educ Psychol, 84:137-151.
  102. Salmela-Aro K, Upadyaya K, Symonds JE (2024) Student engagement in adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective. J Res Adolesc, 34:45-61.
  103. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB (2001) Work and well-being: Towards a positive occupational health psychology. Gedrag en Organizatie, 14:229-253.
  104. Schaufeli WB, Martínez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB (2002) Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. J Cross Cult Psychol, 33:464-481.
  105. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud, 3:71-92.
  106. Schoon I, Bynner J (2019) Young people and the Great Recession: Variations in the school-to-work transition in Europe and the United States. Longit Life Course Stud, 10:153-173.
  107. Schwartz SJ, Zamboanga BL, Luyckx K, Meca A, Ritchie RA (2013) Identity in emerging adulthood: Reviewing the field and looking forward. Emerg Adulthood, 1:96-113.
  108. Schüler J, Nakamura J (2013) Does flow experience lead to risk? How and for whom. Appl Psychol Health Well Being, 5:311-331.
  109. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: An introduction. Am Psychol, 55:5-14.
  110. Senko C (2019) When do mastery and performance goals facilitate academic achievement?. Contemp Educ Psychol, 59:101795.
  111. Shcheglova IA (2018) A cross-cultural comparison of the academic engagement of students. Russ Educ Soc, 60:665-681.
  112. Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B, Shernoff ES (2014) Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education (Ed M Csikszentmihalyi):475-494. New York, Springer.
  113. Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kamiyama K, Kawakami N (2015) Workaholism vs. work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance. International Int J Behav Med, 22:18-23.
  114. Singh A, Gupta M, Kumar R (2024) Cognitive engagement as a predictor of learning gain in programming education. Smart Learn Environ, 11:58.
  115. Skinner EA, Belmont MJ (1993) Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J Educ Psychol, 85:571-581
  116. Skinner EA, Pitzer JR (2012) Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (Eds SL Christenson, AL Reschly, C Wylie):21-44. New York, Springer.
  117. Steele JP, Fullagar CJ (2009) Facilitators and outcomes of student engagement in a college setting. J Psychol, 143:5-27.
  118. Symonds JE, Kaplan A, Upadyaya K, Aro KS, Torsney BM, Skinner E, Eccles JS (2024) Momentary student engagement as a dynamic developmental system. J Theor Philos Psychol, 45:493-510.
  119. Symonds JE, Schreiber B, Upadyaya K, Salmela-Aro K (2021) Longitudinal and momentary associations between motivation and engagement in the classroom: An experience sampling study. Learn Individ Differ, 91:102045.
  120. Tinto V (1975) Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Rev Educ Res, 45:89-125.
  121. Tinto V (1997) Universities as learning organizations. About Campus, 1:2-4.
  122. Tinto V (2012) Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  123. Tomlinson M, Reedy F, Burg D (2023) Graduating in uncertain times: The impact of COVID-19 on recent graduate career prospects, trajectories and outcomes. High Educ Q, 77:486-500.
  124. Trowler V (2010) Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11:1-15.
  125. Truta C, Parv L, Topala I (2018) Academic engagement and intention to drop out: Levers for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 10:4637.
  126. TÜİK (2025) Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu İstatistiklerle Gençlik 2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Genclik-2024-54077 (Accessed 05.10.2025).
  127. UNFPA (2024) Türkiye Gençlik Araştırması 2023: Gençlerin Perspektifinden Çocuk Yaşta, Erken ve Zorla Evlilikler (Nitel Araştırma). Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etüdleri Enstitüsü ve Birleşmiş Milletler Nüfus Fonu (UNFPA).
  128. Upadyaya K, Salmela-Aro K (2013) Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts: A review of empirical research. Eur Psychol, 18:136-147.
  129. Upadyaya K, Salmela-Aro K (2017) Developmental dynamics between young adults’ life satisfaction and engagement with studies and work. Longit Life Course Stud, 8:20-34.
  130. Vansteenkiste M, Ryan RM, Soenens B (2020) Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motiv Emot, 44:1-31.
  131. Voelkl KE (1997) Identification with school. Am J Educ, 105:294-318.
  132. Wang MT, Eccles JS (2012) Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. J Res Adolesc, 22:31-39.
  133. Wang MT, Hofkens TL (2020) Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolesc Res Rev, 5:419-433.
  134. Wang MT, Holcombe R (2010) Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. Am Educ Res J, 47:633-662.
  135. Wang MT, Peck SC (2013) Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Dev Psychol, 49:1266-1276.
  136. Wang Y, Zuo M, He X, Wang Z (2025) Exploring students online learning behavioral engagement in university: Factors, academic performance and their relationship. Behav Sci (Basel), 15:78.
  137. Wigfield A, Eccles JS (2000) Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol, 25:68-81.
  138. Xie K, Hospel V, Lens W (2022) The role of motivation and engagement in students’ learning and well-being: A cross-cultural perspective. Educ Psychol Rev, 34:87-110.
  139. Xu B, Chen NS, Chen G (2023) Student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical investigation. Educ Inf Technol, 28:12543-12561.
  140. Yiğit LE, Günüç APDS (2017) Comparison of student engagement from two different universities in Turkey in terms of technology integration and campus climate. International Journal on New Trends in Education & Their Implications, 8:9-12.
  141. YÖK (2024a) 2023–2024 Öğretim Yılı Yükseköğretim İstatistikleri. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ (Accessed 27.12.2024).
  142. YÖK (2024b) Yükseköğretim kurumlarında kayıt donduran, yatay geçiş yapan ve kaydını sildiren öğrencilere ilişkin istatistikler (2019–2024). https://www.yok.gov.tr/ (Accessed 27.12.2024).
  143. Zeng G, Hou H, Peng K (2016) Effect of growth mindset on school engagement and psychological well-being of Chinese primary and middle school students: The mediating role of resilience. Front Psychol, 7:1873.
  144. Zhang Y, Li X, Wang Q (2025) Academic stress and burnout among university students: Implications for engagement and well-being. Front Psychol, 16:1517920.