Journals / Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

The influence of foliar humic acid applications on nutrition status, yield and quality in open tomato growing

Açıkta domates yetiştiriciliğinde yapraktan uygulanan humik asitin bitkinin beslenme durumu, verimi ve kalitesi üzerine etkileri

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-05-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study shows that 0.30 % was found the most effective dose, aspect of plant nutrition status and fruit quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the study was to find the influence of foliar humic acid applications on plant nutrient status, yield and quality of tomato.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tomato plants were treated with foliar humic acid applications at various concentrations (control, 0.15 %, 0.30 %, 0.45 %).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study shows that 0.30 % was found the most effective dose, aspect of plant nutrition status and fruit quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domates · Humik asit · Beslenme durumu

Abstract

The objective of the study was to find the influence of foliar humic acid applications on plant nutrient status, yield and quality of tomato. Tomato plants were treated with foliar humic acid applications at various concentrations (control, 0.15 %, 0.30 %, 0.45 %). The experiment was conducted according to completely randomized block design with 4 replicates. Forty five days after planting humic acid was sprayed four times at 15-day intervals. Foliar humic acid applications led to higher leaf N, K, Ca, Mg, Mn and Cu uptake than the control. Generally, the highest increase was obtained with 0.30 % dose, the increases at the 0.45 % dose was found lower than the other doses. Foliar humic acid application did not affect yield. Total soluble solid content was increased depending on application doses. The study shows that 0.30 % was found the most effective dose, aspect of plant nutrition status and fruit quality.

Özet

Bu çalışmada yapraktan uygulanan humik asitin domates bitkisinin beslenme durumu, verimi ve kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Humik asit domates bitkilerine yapraktan farklı dozlarda (kontrol, % 0.15, % 0.30, % 0.45) uygulanmıştır. Çalışma tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre dört tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Humik asit uygulamaları dikimden 45 gün sonra, 15 gün aralıkla dört defa tekrarlanmıştır. Yapraktan uygulanan humik asit domates bitkisinin N, K, Ca, Mg, Mn ve Cu alımını kontrole göre önemli ölçüde artırmıştır. Genel olarak en önemli artışlar % 0.30 dozuyla sağlanırken, % 0.45 dozundaki artışlar diğer uygulama dozlarına oranla daha düşük bulunmuştur. Yapılan uygulamaların domates verimi üzerine etkili olmadığı saptanmıştır. Suda çözünebilir kuru madde miktarı yapraktan humik asit uygulamalarına bağlı olarak artmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları % 0.30 humik asit uygulama dozunun, domatesin beslenme durumu ve kalitesi açısından en etkili doz olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASRİ, F. Ö., DEMİRTAŞ, E. İ., ARI, N. (2016). The influence of foliar humic acid applications on nutrition status, yield and quality in open tomato growing. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/123356

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alak HC, Müftüoğlu NM (2014) Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Alınabilir Potasyum Üzerine Etkisi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fak. Dergisi 2(2):61-66.
  2. Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Metzger JD, Lee S, Arancon NQ (2002) The Influence of Humic Acids Derived from Earthworm-Processed Organic Wastes on Plant Growth. Bioresource Technology 84:7-14.
  3. Black CA (1957) Soil-Plant Relationships. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. Black CA (1965) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher Madisson, Wilconsin, U.S.AA. 1372-1376.
  4. Bohme M, Thi Lua H (1997) Influence of Mineral and Organic Treatments in The Rhizosphere on the Growth of Tomato Plants. Acta Horticulturae 450:161-168.
  5. Bouyoucos GJ (1955) A Recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of the soils. Agronomy Journal 4(9):434. Carvajal M, Martinezsanchez F, Alcaraz CF (1995) Improvement of Fruit Colour Quality of Paprika Combined Treatments of Humic Acids. Acta Alimentaria 24(4):321-329.
  6. Cemeroğlu B (1992) Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metodları. Biltav Yayınları,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Chen Y, Aviad T (1990) Effect of Humic Substances on Plant Growth. In: Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Reading, MacCarthy, P., C.E.Clapp, R.L.Malcolm and P.R. Bloom (Eds). Soil Science Society American., Madison, WI., pp.161-187.
  9. Çelik H, Katkat VA, Aşık BB, Turan MA (2011) Effect of Foliar-Applied Humic Acid to Dry Weight and Mineral Nutrient Uptake of Maize under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42:29-38.
  10. Doğan E, Demir K (2004) Sera koşullarında hümik asit katkılı katı ortam kültürüyle yetiştirilen domatesin gelişim, verim ve meyve özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. V.Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, Çanakkale, s.218-224.
  11. Dursun A, Güvenç İ, Turan M (1999) Macro and Micro Nutrient Contents of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and eggplant (Solanum melongena var. Esculentum) Seedlings and Their Effects on Seedling Growth in Relation to Humic Acid Application. Improved Crop Quality by Nutrient Management Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences 86:229-232.
  12. El-Nemr MA, El-Desuki M, El-Bassiony MA, Fawzy ZF (2012) Response of Growth and Yield of Cucumber Plants (Cucumis Sativus L.) to Different Foliar Applications of Humic Acid and Bio-Stimulators. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 6(3):630-637.
  13. Evliya H (1964) Kültür Bitkilerinin Beslenmesi. Ankara Üni. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları, Sayı:10. Eyheraguibel B, Sivestre J, Morard P (2008) Eff