SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Green organizational identity: Socio-semiotic analysis of why organizations appear green

Yeşil örgütsel kimlik: Örgütlerin niçin yeşil göründüklerinin sosyo-semiyotik analizi

Salih Arslan(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0602-3890
Hakan Olgun(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi)0000-0002-8650-0211
Pages
181–226
Publication Date
2025-03-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be said that companies are trying to produce a meaning and perception that they have internalized green thought in their corporate environment and made it the central determinant of their practices through this transformation in their organizational identities by using the ability of the color green to represent environmentalism or ecologism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study is about the relationship between organizations' green organizational identity building efforts and their strategies for using colors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aims to reveal how organizations use colors in the process of redesigning their organizational identities centered on green thought.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be said that companies are trying to produce a meaning and perception that they have internalized green thought in their corporate environment and made it the central determinant of their practices through this transformation in their organizational identities by using the ability of the color green to represent environmentalism or ecologism.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Kimlik · Yeşil Düşünce · Çevrecilik

Abstract

The study is about the relationship between organizations' green organizational identity building efforts and their strategies for using colors. The study aims to reveal how organizations use colors in the process of redesigning their organizational identities centered on green thought. The study was designed with a qualitative multiple case studies. As data, images on the official websites of seven companies selected from the Turkish iron and steel industry using purposeful sampling technique were used. Images were analyzed with the color analysis technique of social semiotics. Findings show that the color green is used intensively in the images and is associated with the factory or administrative building that represents the company. It is especially common in all images to frame the factory or administrative building that represents the company in a green frame and to allow the viewer to look at the symbolic objects that represent the company through a green window. The conclusion of the study is that the use of green color as a background in the official website designs of companies and the related and interconnected display of symbolic objects representing the company in green serve a transforming function in the meaning of concrete material objects. It can be said that companies are trying to produce a meaning and perception that they have internalized green thought in their corporate environment and made it the central determinant of their practices through this transformation in their organizational identities by using the ability of the color green to represent environmentalism or ecologism.

Özet

Çalışma örgütlerin yeşil örgütsel kimlik inşa çabaları ile renkleri kullanma stratejileri arasındaki ilişkiyi konu edinmektedir. Çalışmada örgütlerin örgütsel kimliklerini yeşil düşünce merkezli yeniden tasarlama sürecinde renkleri nasıl kullandıklarının ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışma nitel çoklu örnek olay deseniyle tasarlanmıştır. Veri olarak Türkiye demir-çelik sektöründen amaçlı örneklem tekniği ile seçilen yedi firmanın resmi web sitelerindeki görseller kullanılmıştır. Görseller sosyal semiyotiğin renk analizi tekniği ile çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular görsellerde yeşil rengin yoğun ve firmayı temsil eden fabrika ya da yönetim binası ile ilişkili bir şekilde kullanıldığını göstermektedir. Özellikle firmayı temsil eden fabrika ya da yönetim binasının yeşil bir çerçeve içine alınması ve izleyicinin yeşil renkte bir pencereden firmayı temsil eden sembolik nesnelere bakmasının sağlanması bütün görsellerde yaygındır. Çalışmanın ulaştığı sonuç, firmaların resmi web sitesi tasarımlarında yeşil rengin arka plan olarak kullanılması ve yeşil renkle firmayı temsil eden sembolik nesnelerin ilişkili ve iç içe gösterilmesi somut maddi nesnelerin anlamını dönüştürücü bir işlev görmektedir. Firmaların yeşil rengin çevrecilik ya da ekolojizmi temsil yeteneğini kullanarak örgütsel kimliklerinde gerçekleştirdikleri bu dönüşüm aracılığıyla kurumsal çevrelerinde yeşil düşünceyi özümsedikleri ve pratiklerinin merkezi belirleyicisi haline getirdikleri şeklinde bir anlam ve algı üretmeye çalıştıkları söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arslan, S., Olgun, H. (2025). Green organizational identity: Socio-semiotic analysis of why organizations appear green. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 181–226. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1423343

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (89)

  1. Albert, S. & Whetten, D.A. (1985). Organizational identity. L.L. Cummings & M.M. Staw (Eds). Research in organizational behavior içinde (ss. 263-295). JAI.
  2. Albert, S., Ashforth, B.E. & Dutton, J.E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13-17.
  3. Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619-644.
  4. Ashforth, B.E., Rogers, K.M. & Corley, K.G. (2011). Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization Science, 22(5), 1144-1156.
  5. Avrupa Komisyonu. (2019). Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı [The European Green Deal]. (Çev. Abiral, B., Zorer, E., Azman, G., Sönmez, H., Çelik, Ö., Köksal, S. & Abanus, Y.E.), https://www.yesildusunce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/yesilavrupamutabakati.pdf
  6. Bansal, P. & Clelland. I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
  7. Bothello, J. & Djelic, M. L. (2018). Evolving conceptualizations of organizational environmentalism: A path generation account. Organization Studies, 39(1), 93-119.
  8. Brickson, S.L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576-609.
  9. Brown, A.D. & Starkey, K. (2000). Organizational identity and organizational learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 102-120.
  10. Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.
  11. Caivano, J. L. (1998). Color and semiotics: A two‐way street. Color Research & Application, 23(6), 390-401.
  12. Cangızbay, K. (1989). ‘Habeas corpus’tan ‘habeas oikos’a veya ekolojizmin zorunlu güzergahı. Türkiye Günlüğü, 3, 39-40.
  13. Chreim, S. (2005). The continuity change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 567-593.
  14. Clark, S.M., Gioia, D.A., Ketchen, D., Jr., & Thomas, J.B. (2010). Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 397-438.
  15. Clegg, S.R., Rhodes, C. & Kornberger, M. (2007). Desperately seeking legitimacy: Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies, 28(4), 495-513.
  16. Corley, K.G. (2004). Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change. Human Relations, 57, 1145-1178.
  17. Corley, K.G. & Gioia, D.A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173-208.
  18. Corley, K.G., Harquail, C.V., Pratt, M.G., Glynn, M.A., Fiol, C.M. & Hatch, M.J. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 85-99.
  19. Czarniawska, B. & Wolff, R. (1998). Constructing new identities in established organization fields: Young universities in old Europe. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(3), 32-56.
  20. Çoban, A. (2002). Çevreciliğin ideolojik unsurların eklemlenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57(3), 3-30.
  21. Diler Demirçelik (2024). Anasayfa. https://www.dilerhld.com/grup.asp?anagrup_no=1&grup_no=59
  22. Dobson, A. (2007). Green political thought. Routledge.
  23. Drori, I., Honig, B. & Sheaffer, Z. (2009). The life cycle of an internet firm: Scripts, legitimacy, and identity. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 33(3), 715-738.
  24. Dutton, J.E. & Dukerich, J.M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaption. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 517-554.
  25. Ecer, K., Güner, O. & Çetin, M. (2021). Avrupa yeşil mutabakatı ve Türkiye ekonomisinin uyum politikaları. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 125-144.
  26. Elsbach, K.D. & Kramer, R.M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442-476.
  27. Erdemir (2024). Kurumsal. https://www.erdemir.com.tr/kurumsal/kurumsal-alt-sayfa
  28. Fiol, C.M. (1991). Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 191-211.
  29. Fiol, C.M. (2001). Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27, 691-699.
  30. Fiol, C.M. (2002). Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13(6), 653-666.
  31. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.
  32. Forbes, L. C. & Jermier, J. M. (2010). The new corporate environmentalism and the ecology of commerce. Organization & environment, 23(4), 465-481.
  33. Francesconi, S. (2016). Green hypermodality: A social semiotic multimodal analysis of the ‘Green your house’webpage. O. Palusci (Ed). Green Canada içinde (ss. 251-262). Peter Lang.
  34. Gioia, D.A. & Thomas, J.B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370-403.
  35. Gioia, D.A., Patvardhan, S.D., Hamilton, A.L. & Corley, K.G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123-192.
  36. Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M. & Corley, K.G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63-81.
  37. Glynn, M.A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285-298.
  38. Glynn, M.A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Ed). Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism içinde (ss. 413-430). Sage.
  39. Glynn, M.A. & Abzug, R. (2002). Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 267-280.
  40. Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human relations, 55(8), 989-1018.
  41. He, H. & Brown, A.D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3-35.
  42. Hoffman, A.J. & Henn, R. (2008). Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organization & Environment, 21(4), 390-419.
  43. Humphreys, M. & Brown, A.D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23, 421-447.
  44. İçdaş (2024). Anasayfa. https://www.icdas.com.tr/
  45. İmga, O. & Olgun, H. (2017). Sunuş. O. İmga & H. Olgun (Ed). Yeşil ve siyaset: Siyasal ekoloji üzerine yazılar içinde (ss. 13-16). Liberte.
  46. Jermier, J.M., Forbes, L.C., Benn, S. & Orsato, R.J. (2006). The new corporate environmentalism and green politics. S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence & W.R. Nord (Ed). Sage handbook of organization studies içinde (ss. 618-650). Sage.
  47. Kardemir (2024). Anasayfa. https://www.kardemir.com/
  48. Keleş, R. & Hamamcı, C. (2005). Çevre politikası. İmge.
  49. Kılıç, S. & Tok, N. (2003). Çevrecilikte yeni bir kimlik: Ekolojizm. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(2), 223-250.
  50. Kjærgaard, A., Morsing, M. & Ravasi, D. (2011). Mediating identity: A study of media influence on organizational identity construction in a celebrity firm. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 514-543.
  51. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual communication, 1(3), 343-368.
  52. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
  53. Mescier Demirçelik (2024). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik. https://www.mescierdc.com.tr/kurumsal-surdurulebilirlik.php
  54. Mirici, M. E. & Berberoğlu, S. (2022). Türkiye perspektifinde yeşil mutabakat ve karbon ayak izi: Tehdit mi? Fırsat mı?. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 8(1), 156-164.
  55. Nag, R., Corley, K.G. & Gioia, D.A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 821-847.
  56. Navis, C. & Glynn, M.A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439-471.
  57. Olgun, H. (2021). İnsan-doğa ilişkileri bağlamında çevre olgusu. A. Yılmaz (Ed). Çevre Bilimleri içinde (ss. 32-54). Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  58. Olgun, H. & Işık, V. (2017). Bir “insan hakkı” olarak “çevre hakkı” ve Türk hukukundaki yeri. Uluslararası Politik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 33-52.
  59. Önder, T. (2003). Ekoloji, toplum ve siyaset. Odak.
  60. Öz, E. (1989). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de ‘ekoloji hareketi’nin gelişimi: Çevre koruma derneklerinden siyasal partilere. Türkiye Günlüğü, 3, 27-34.
  61. Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
  62. Patvardhan, S.D., Gioia, D.A. & Hamilton, A.L. (2015). Weathering a meta-level identity crisis: Forging a coherent collective identity for an emerging field. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 405-435.
  63. Pedersen, J.S. & Dobbin, F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897-907.
  64. Pratt, M.G. (2012). Rethinking identity construction processes in organizations: Three questions to consider. M. Schultz, S. Maguire, A. Langley ve H. Tsoukas (Ed). Constructing identity in and around organizations içinde (ss. 21-49). Oxford University Press.
  65. Pratt, M.G. & Foreman, P.O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18-42.
  66. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 795-843.
  67. Ravasi, D. & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433-458.
  68. Robbins, P. (2007). Encyclopedia of environment and society. SAGE.
  69. Scott, S.G. & Lane, V.R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43-62.
  70. SEFİA (2022). Türkiye çelik sektörü raporu: üretim, ticaret ve karbonsuzlaşma süreci. https://sefia.org/arastirmalar/turkiye-celik-sektoru-raporu-uretim-ticaret-ve-karbonsuzlasma-sureci/
  71. Shrivastava, P. (1994). Castrated environment: Greening organizational studies. Organization Studies, 15(5), 705-726.
  72. Sipahi, E. B. & Dinçer, S. (2019). Yeşil ideolojiler bağlamında yeşil siyasetin Türkiye’deki siyasi partilere yansımaları. Kent ve Çevre Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 17-57.
  73. Stake, R.E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
  74. Tosçelik (2024). Anasayfa. https://www.toscelik.com.tr/
  75. TÜSİAD (2020). Ekonomik göstergeler merceğinden yeni iklim rejimi. https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/10633-ekonomik-gostergeler-merceginden-yeni-i-klim-rejimi-raporu
  76. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Psychology Press.
  77. Van Leeuwen, T. (2011). The language of colour: An introduction. Routledge.
  78. Waeraas, A. & Ihlen, Q. (2009) Green legitimation: The construction of an environmental ethos. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 17.2, 84-102.
  79. Whetten, D.A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited - Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219-234.
  80. Whetten, D.A. & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business and Society, 41(4), 393-414.
  81. Wright, C. & Nyberg, D. (2012). Working with passion: Emotionology, corporate environmentalism and climate change. Human Relations, 65(12), 1561-1587.
  82. Wright, C., Nyberg, D. & Grant, D. (2012). Hippies on the third floor: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organization studies, 33(11), 1451-1475.
  83. Wry, T., Lounsbury M. & Glynn, M.A. (2011). Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2), 449-463.
  84. Ybema, S. (2010). Talk of change: Temporal contrasts and collective identities. Organization Studies, 31(4), 481-503.
  85. Ybema, S., Keenoy, T., Oswick, C., Beverungen, A., Ellis, N. & Sabelis, I. (2009). Articulating identities. Human Relations, 62(3), 299-322.
  86. Yeşilyurt Demirçelik (2024). Hakkında. https://www.yesilyurtdc.com.tr/hakkinda/sirket-profili
  87. Yıldırım, K. (2021). Tarihsel süreç içerisinde çevre hareketlerinde ortaya çıkan farklılıklar üzerine bir incelenme. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(16), 360-382.
  88. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
  89. Yin, R.K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.