SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Adaptation of the couple relationship skills inventory to Turkish

Çiftlerin ilişki becerileri envanterinin Türkçeye uyarlanması

Gökay Keldal(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7998-0766
Nurseven Kılıç(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8724-7564
Pages
68–89
Publication Date
2025-03-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is worth mentioning that CRSI is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be utilized to measure the relationship skills of individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Couple Relationship Skills Inventory (CRSI) was developed based on the National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model (NERMEM) to measure the relationship skills of individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 305 adults (101 male and 204 female) aged 18-62 years old participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is worth mentioning that CRSI is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be utilized to measure the relationship skills of individuals.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İlişki becerisi · çiftler · ilişki eğitimi

Abstract

The Couple Relationship Skills Inventory (CRSI) was developed based on the National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model (NERMEM) to measure the relationship skills of individuals. The goal of this study was to make the Turkish adaptation of the CRSI and to examine its psychometric properties. A total of 305 adults (101 male and 204 female) aged 18-62 years old participated in the study. The psychometric properties of the CRSI were examined using confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and criterion-related validity methods. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original 32-item, 9-factor form of the CRSI lost its structure in Turkish culture, but it possessed a 27-item and 8-factor structure. The internal consistency of the entire inventory was .86. In the context of criterion-related validity, positive and significant relationships were found between the CRSI and the Perceived Romantic Relationship Quality Scale. As a result, it is worth mentioning that CRSI is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be utilized to measure the relationship skills of individuals.

Özet

Çiftlerin İlişki Becerileri Envanteri (ÇİBE), bireylerin ilişki becerilerini ölçmek üzere Ulusal İlişki Geliştirme ve Evlilik Eğitimi Modelini (UİGEEM) temel alarak geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ÇİBE’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlamasını yapmak ve psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Araştırmada, yaşları 18-62 arasında olan toplam 305 katılımcı (101 erkek ve 204 kadın) yer almıştır. ÇİBE’nin psikometrik özellikleri doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA), iç tutarlık ve ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik yöntemleriyle incelenmiştir. DFA sonucu, ÇİBE’nin 32 maddeli 9 boyutlu orijinal formunun Türk kültüründe yapısını korumadığı, 27 madde ve 8 boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. ÇİBE’ye ilişkin iç tutarlık katsayısı .86 bulunmuştur. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik kapsamında ise, ÇİBE ile Algılanan Romantik İlişki Kalitesi Ölçeği arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, ÇİBE’nin bireylerin ilişki becerilerini ölçmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Keldal, G., Kılıç, N. (2025). Adaptation of the couple relationship skills inventory to Turkish. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 68–89. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1386206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Abdel-Sater, R. (2022). Marriage dissolution in the United States: A survival analysis approach. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 63(4), 235-261, https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2022.2042788
  2. Adler‐Baeder, F., Futris, T. G., McGill, J., Richardson, E. W., & Dede-Yildirim, E. (2022). Validating the couple relationship skills inventory. Family Relations, 71(1), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12590
  3. Adler-Baeder, F., McGill, J., Yildirim, E. D., Gregson, K., Cooper, E., Burke, L., Finnegan, V., & Jackel, R. (2022). Concurrent randomized control trials of the 1-year efficacy of two couple relationship education programs: ELEVATE and couples connecting mindfully. Family Process, 61(3), 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12750
  4. Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People's reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 602-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03254507
  5. Ali, A., Khaliqjan, S. U., Khan, S. A., Ali, H., Ahmad, S., Zakriya, M., Shakoor, A., Alam, A., & Mahmood, T. (2022). A cross sectional analysis of immorality and divorce in traditional society, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 63(3), 200-213, https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1993025
  6. Brotherson, S., Behnke, A., & Goddard, W. (2013). Connect: Engaging in a positive social network of support. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  7. Brotherson, S., Marshall, J., Schramm, D., & Futris, T. G. (2013). Share: Developing and maintaining a couple identity. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  8. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73
  9. Davidson, K. (2004). “Why can’t a man be more like a woman?” Marital status and social networking of older men. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 13(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1301.25
  10. Doherty, W. J., Kalantar, S. M., & Tarsafi, M. (2021). Divorce ambivalence and reasons for divorce in Iran. Family Process, 60(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12539
  11. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü (1946). Sağlıklı olmanın tanımı. https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution
  12. Ergöçmen, B. A., Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ., & Jansen, H. A. (2013). Intimate partner violence and the relation between help-seeking behavior and the severity and frequency of physical violence among women in Turkey. Violence Against Women, 19(9), 1151-1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213498474
  13. Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720026500
  14. Futris, T. G., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2013). The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Linking Research to Relationship and Marriage Education In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. http://www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  15. Goddard, W., Brotherson, S., Schramm, D., & Behnke, A. (2013). Care: Using nurturing, caring, and affectionate behaviors. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. http://www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Pearson.
  17. Harrington, D. (2008). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press.
  18. Higginbotham, B., Santiago, A., & Barton, A. W. (2013). Choose: Making intentional relationship choices. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  19. İşmen-Gazioǧlu, A. E., Mercan, Ç. S., & Demir, İ. (2022). Romantic Relationship Education: A Literature Review with Recommendations for Turkiye. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar, 14(4), 555-569. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1069117
  20. Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25(3), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00010-8
  21. Karahan, T. F. (2009) The effects of a couple communication program on the conflict resolution skills and active conflict tendencies of turkish couples. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 35(3), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230802716344
  22. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. Kneip, T., & Bauer, G. (2009). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates in Western Europe? Journal of Marriage & Family,71(3), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00621.x
  23. Marshall, J., Santiago, A., Adler-Baeder, F., & Futris, T. (2013). Manage: Dealing with differences in healthy ways. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. http://www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  24. Olsen, C. S., Barton, A., Futris, T. G., & Schramm, D. (2013). Know: Maintaining knowledge of your partner’s world. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. http://www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  25. Parker, G., Durante, K. M., Hill, S. E., & Haselton, M. G. (2022). Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective. Current opinion in psychology, 43, 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.020
  26. Previti, D., & Amato, P. R. (2004). Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2) 217 – 230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041384
  27. Richardson, E. W., Mallette, J. K., Futris, T. G., & Pettit, M. (2023). Non-relative foster caregivers’ changes in mindfulness and couple relationship skills following relationship education. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Advenced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231157774
  28. Sağkal, A. S. & Özdemir, Y. (2018). Algılanan Romantik İlişki Kalitesi Ölçeği’nin (ARİKÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 22-40. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.329888
  29. Sbarra, D. A., & Whisman, M. A. (2022). Divorce, health, and socioeconomic status: An agenda for psychological science. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43(special issue), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.007
  30. South, S. J., Trent, K., & Shen, Y. (2001). Changing partners: Toward a macrostructural‐opportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 743-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00743.x
  31. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK), (2022). Evlenme ve boşanma istatistikleri. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Evlenme-ve-Bosanma-Istatistikleri-2022-49437
  32. Wang, Q. & Zhou, Q. (2010). China's divorce and remarriage rates: Trends and regional disparities. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(4), 257-267, https://doi.org/10.1080/10502551003597949
  33. Wiley, A., Adler-Baeder, F., & Warzinik, K. (2013). Care for self: Maintaining physical, sexual, emotional, and spiritual wellness. In T. G. Futris & F. Adler-Baeder (Eds.), The National Extension Relationship and Marriage Education Model: Core teaching concepts for relationship and marriage enrichment programming. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. http://www.nermen.org/NERMEM.php
  34. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counselling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127