Journals / Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Determination of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at field conditions and mathematical modeling

Tarla koşullarında doymamış toprak hidrolik iletkenliğinin belirlenmesi ve matematiksel modellenmesi

Pages
291–298
Publication Date
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If the soil-water dynamics studies will be carry out, on-site measurements should be made to determine soil hydraulic conductivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to determine the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity in the heavily structured Arıklı soil series with 37o00'53" N and 35o21'24" S coordinates and to compare the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity measured in the field and laboratory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Water applied to saturate soil plots, which were covered with PE film under free drainage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If the soil-water dynamics studies will be carry out, on-site measurements should be made to determine soil hydraulic conductivity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:TDR · Serbest drenaj yöntemi · Doygun olmayan hidrolik iletkenlik

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity in the heavily structured Arıklı soil series with 37o00'53" N and 35o21'24" S coordinates and to compare the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity measured in the field and laboratory. Water applied to saturate soil plots, which were covered with PE film under free drainage. The soil plots of square shapes had 2×2 m-dimensions. Water content and matric suction of soil with time were monitored by TDR/tensiometer. Arıklı series hydraulic conductivity was calculated as 0.007-0.652 cm hr-1. The mathematical model of soil-water characteristics was developed and models were expressed by exponential functions. When the agreement between K (ϴ)obs observed in field conditions and estimated K (ψ)mod was tested; root mean square error (RMSE) with 0.081 cm hr-1 and mean absolute error (MAE) with 0.053 cm hr-1 was small but the mean relative error (MRE) value had a high error value of 16.5%. The results also revealed that the proposed approach was accurate for predicting K (ϴ)obs in the dry range of soil water content. However, good results were not obtained in saturation. If the soil-water dynamics studies will be carry out, on-site measurements should be made to determine soil hydraulic conductivity.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 37o00'53'' K ve 35o21'24'' D koordinatlarına sahip ağır bünyeli Arıklı toprak serisinde doygun olmayan toprak hidrolik iletkenliğin belirlenmesi ve arazide yerinde ölçülen ile laboratuvarda ölçülen toprak hidrolik iletkenlik değerlerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Serbest drenaj altında üzeri PE film ile kapatılmış toprak parsellerinin doygun hale getirilmesi için su uygulanmıştır. Toprak parselleri yaklaşık olarak 2×2 m boyutlarında oluşturulmuştur. Toprak su içeriği ve matriks emişin zamanla değişimi TDR ve tansiyometre ile izlenmiştir. Arıklı toprak serisine ilişkin hidrolik iletkenlik değeri 0.007-0.652 cm sa-1 arasında hesaplanmıştır. Toprak-su karakteristiğine ilişkin matematiksel model geliştirilmiş ve model üstel bir fonksiyon ile ifade edilmiştir. Genel olarak, tarla koşullarında gözlemlenen hidrolik iletkenlik K (ϴ)göz ile tahminlenen hidrolik iletkenlik K (ψ)mod arasındaki uyum test edildiğinde; kök ortalama kare hatası (RMSE) 0.081 cm sa-1 ve ortalama mutlak hata (MAE) 0.053 cm sa-1 ile küçük olmakla beraber ortalama göreceli hata (MRE) değeri %16.5 ile yüksek bir hata değerine sahip olmuştur. Sonuçlar ayrıca, önerilen yaklaşımın kuru toprak suyu içeriğindeki K (ϴ)göz tahminlemesinde doğru olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak, doygun koşullarda iyi sonuç vermediği gözlemlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak toprak su dinamiği çalışmalarında çalışma yapılacaksa, toprak hidrolik iletkenliğinin belirlenmesinde arazide yerinde ölçümlerin yapılması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIYEV, A., SESVEREN, S., TÜLÜN, Y., KAMAN, H., ACAR, M. (2020). Determination of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at field conditions and mathematical modeling. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 291–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/123136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahmadi SH, Sepaskhah AR (2012) Prediction of saturated hydraulic conductivity of compacted soils using empirical scaling factors. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 58: 1303-1316.
  2. Ahmadi SH, Sepaskhah AR, Fooladmand HR (2015) A simple approach to predicting unsaturated hydraulic conductivity based on empirically scaled microscopic characteristic length. Hydrological Sciences Journal 60(2): 326-335.
  3. Ahuja LR, Naney JW, Nielsen DR (1991) Scaling soil water properties and infiltration modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48: 970-973.
  4. Al-Sulaiman M, Aboukarima A (2016) Prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of agricultural soils using artificial neural network and c#. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International 5(4): 1-15.
  5. Black CA (1965) Methods of soil analysis part-II. America Society of Agronomy-Inc., Publisher Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1372-1376.
  6. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) in ed.: A. Klute, Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Agronomy. Monograph 9, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison WI, pp. 363-375.
  7. Bondarenko HF, Jukovsky EE, Muskın IG, Nerpin SV, Poluektov RA, Uskov IB (1982) Simulation of Agroecosystem Productivity, Russia. Bouyoucos GJ (1951) A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal 43: 435-438.
  8. Comegna V, Damiani P, Sommella A (2000) Scaling the saturated hydraulic conductivity of a vertic ustorthens soil under conventional and minimum tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 54: 1-9.
  9. Cook FJ (1991) Calculation of hydraulic conductivity from suction permeameter measurements. Soil Science, pp. 321-325.
  10. Danielson RE, Sutherland PL (1986) Porosity. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods Second Edition, pp. 443-462.
  11. Finsterle S, Faybishenko B (1999) Inverse modeling of a radial multistep outflow experiment for determining unsaturated hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research 2: 431-444.
  12. Gemalmaz E (1992) Örneklenen toprak hacmi ile arazide ölçülen hidrolik iletkenlik değerlerinin varyansı arasındaki ilişki, IV. Ulusal Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Kongresi Bildirileri, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tanmsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü. Erzurum. Kırda C, Sarıyev A (2002) Toprak Fiziği. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Genel yayın No: 245, Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-79, Adana. Klute A (1986) Water Retention: Laboratory Methods. In: Methods of Soil Ana