SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 04

Mathematical Modelling of Wheat Yield Triticum aestivum L.

Buğday Triticum aestivum L. Veriminin Matematiksel Modellenmesi

Metin MÜJDECİ
Alhan SARIYEV
Veysel POLAT
Pages
349–353
Publication Date
2005-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The values of model and real experimental values of the were compared to and applied statistical evaluation for daily photosynthesis rate revealed that the model results and observe values were correlated well r=0.95, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to mathematical modelling of yield for three years under Seri-82 wheat plant Triticum aestivum L. on the field experiment in the university of Çukurova, Faculty of agriculture experimental area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of physiologyical development dates, maximum leaf area index, minumum leaf area index, maximum photosynthesis rate, respiration rate and leaf area index constant were determined for wheat plant each year in study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The values of model and real experimental values of the were compared to and applied statistical evaluation for daily photosynthesis rate revealed that the model results and observe values were correlated well r=0.95, p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:simülasyon · matematiksel modelleme · buğday verimi

Abstract

This study was carried out to mathematical modelling of yield for three years under Seri-82 wheat plant Triticum aestivum L. on the field experiment in the university of Çukurova, Faculty of agriculture experimental area. The data of physiologyical development dates, maximum leaf area index, minumum leaf area index, maximum photosynthesis rate, respiration rate and leaf area index constant were determined for wheat plant each year in study. For model related to estimation of daily photosynthesis rate, daily gross photosynthesis, respiration rate maximum and daily leaf area index were used. These were two model for yield estimation. While the model based and only photosynthesis rate, the other model used total plant water consumption, maximum vaporation rate from soil surface and maximum increase rate of daily dry matter amount for flowering period. The values of model and real experimental values of the were compared to and applied statistical evaluation for daily photosynthesis rate revealed that the model results and observe values were correlated well r=0.95, p

Özet

Bu çalışma Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi deneme alanında üç yıl boyunca Seri-82 buğday Triticum aestivum L. çeşidinin yetiştirildiği bir tarla denemesi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada buğday bitkisi için her yıl; fizyolojik olum tarihi, maksimum yaprak alan indeksi, minimum yaprak alan indeksi, hasat indeksi, maksimum fotosentez hızı, solunum hızı ve yaprak alan indeksi sabitesi verileri belirlenmiştir. Günlük fotosentez hızı tahminine yönelik modelde; günlük brüt fotosentez, solunum hızı, maksimum ve günlük yaprak alan indeksi parametreleri kullanılmıştır. Verim tahminine yönelik olarak, kullanılan iki model söz konusudur. Modellerden biri sadece fotosentez hızını esas alırken, diğerinde toplam bitki su tüketimi, toprak yüzeyinden maksimum buharlaşma hızı ve çiçeklenme dönemindeki günlük kuru madde miktarındaki maksimum artış hızı parametrelerinden yararlanılmaktadır. Günlük fotosentez hızı değerleri ile gözlenen değerlerin karşılaştırılması sonucu; uyumluluğun r=0.95, p

🔖

Cite This Article

MÜJDECİ, M., SARIYEV, A., POLAT, V. (2005). Mathematical Modelling of Wheat Yield Triticum aestivum L.. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 04, 349–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/192328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aksoy, H. ve A. Sarıyev. 1997. Çukurova bölgesinde Arık ve Menzilat toprak serilerinde Cropsyst modeli aracılığıyla Diyarbakır-81 buğday çeşidinde potansiyel verimliliğin hesaplanması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi (8):151-158. Adana. Anonymous, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of soil saline and alkaline soils. Agricultural Handbook No: 60. Bastiaassen, W. G. M. ve S. Ali. 2003. A new crop yield forecasting model based on satellite measurements Applied Across the Indus Basin, Pakistan. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94:321-340.
  2. Blake, G. R. ve K. H. Hartge. 1986. Bulk density in: Methods of soil analysis, part 1, physical and mineralogical methods. (Ed: A. Klute) Agr. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison WI.p.363-375.
  3. Bondarenko, H. F., E. E. Jukovsky, I. G. Muskin, S. V. Nerpin, R. A. Poluektov, and I. B. Uskov. 1982. Simulation of agroecosystem productivity. Russia. Bouyoucos, G. J. 1951. Hydrometer method improved for marking particle size analysis of soils. Agronomy J. 54:464-465.
  4. Brejnev, K. 1992. Kocene Sutocnix Norm Prixodyasiy Korotnovolnovori Solnecnoy radiacii. Leningrad, AFİ, 76:28- 31. Bremner, J. M. 1960. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J.Agric Sci., 55:11-33. water and temperature application. Leningrad, Gidrometoizdat, (translated from Russian). Jamieson, P. D., J. Berntsen, F. Ewert, B. A. Kimball, J. E. Olesen, P. J. Pinter Jr, J. R. Porter, and M. A. Semenov. 2000. Modelling CO2 effecting on wheat with varying nitrogen supplies. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 82:27-37.
  5. Kacar, B., V. Katkat ve Ş. Öztürk. 2002. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayın No:198, Bursa. Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. In: methods of soil analysis, part 1, physical and mineralogical methods. (Ed: A. Klute)Agr. Monogr. ). ASA and SSSA Madison WI. p. 635-662.
  6. Müjdeci, M., A. Sarıyev, İ. Çelik, Y. Tülün ve H. Karaca. 2004. Investigation of the relationships between stoma resistance and soil water matric potential with other environmental factors in the respect of mathematical modelling of plant water consumption.International Soil Congress, Natural Resource Management for Sustainable Development, June 7-10. 2004
  7. Erzurum-Turkey. Olsen, S. R., and F. S. Watanabe. 1957. A Method to Determine a phosphorus Adsorption Maximum for Soils as measured by the Langmuir Isoterm. Soil Science Society American Proc. 21:144-149.
  8. Özçelik, A. 1994.