Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6

Effects of housing system, slaughter age, and sex on slaughter and carcass traits of native Turkish ducks

Pages
694–700
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it seems most appropriate to slaughter native Turkish ducks at 10 weeks of age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different housing systems, slaughter age, and sex on slaughter and carcass traits of native Turkish ducks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 133 ducklings were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it seems most appropriate to slaughter native Turkish ducks at 10 weeks of age.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Duck · housing system · sex

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different housing systems, slaughter age, and sex on slaughter and carcass traits of native Turkish ducks. A total of 133 ducklings were used. One-day-old ducklings were divided into 2 housing groups, a cage system and a deep litter floor system, under uniform conditions. Housing system significantly affected hot carcass, cold carcass, breast, wing, neck, and back percentages (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001). The results of the current study showed the influence of housing system, sex, and slaughter age on slaughter and carcass traits. The slaughter and carcass traits and feed conversion efficiency were higher in the deep litter floor system than in the cage system for native Turkish ducks. The slaughter and carcass traits of male ducks were higher than those of female ducks. The ideal slaughter weight for native Turkish ducks was reached at 8 weeks, whereas the results for hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, hot carcass percentage, and cold carcass percentage were better at 10 weeks of age. Therefore, it seems most appropriate to slaughter native Turkish ducks at 10 weeks of age.

Özet

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different housing systems, slaughter age, and sex on slaughter and carcass traits of native Turkish ducks. A total of 133 ducklings were used. One-day-old ducklings were divided into 2 housing groups, a cage system and a deep litter floor system, under uniform conditions. Housing system significantly affected hot carcass, cold carcass, breast, wing, neck, and back percentages (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001). The results of the current study showed the influence of housing system, sex, and slaughter age on slaughter and carcass traits. The slaughter and carcass traits and feed conversion efficiency were higher in the deep litter floor system than in the cage system for native Turkish ducks. The slaughter and carcass traits of male ducks were higher than those of female ducks. The ideal slaughter weight for native Turkish ducks was reached at 8 weeks, whereas the results for hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, hot carcass percentage, and cold carcass percentage were better at 10 weeks of age. Therefore, it seems most appropriate to slaughter native Turkish ducks at 10 weeks of age.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, M., ÖNK, K., IŞIK, S., TİLKİ, M., TUFAN, T. (2013). Effects of housing system, slaughter age, and sex on slaughter and carcass traits of native Turkish ducks. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6, 694–700. https://ajindex.com/articles/121924

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Selcuk E, Akyurt I. Duck Husbandry. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Agriculture and Forest Press, No. 8, 1986. Testik A. The situation of ducks and geese production in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. Halle, Germany: 1995. pp. 43–45. Ensminger ME. Poultry Sciences. 3rd ed. Danville, IL, USA: Interstate Publishers, 1992.
  2. Oluyemi JA, Ologbobo AD. The significance and management of the local duck in Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of the Animal Science Association of Nigeria. Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria: 1997. pp: 96–103. Chandy KT. Duck Housing. Animal Husbandry Ducks: DKS Integrated Sustainable Energy and Ecological Development Association, Booklet No. 433. Bochno RW, Brzozowski W, Murawska D. Age-related changes in the distribution of lean, fat with skin and bones in duck carcasses. Brit Poultry Sci 2005; 46: 199–203.
  3. Lacin E, Aras MS. Effect of different raising systems on fattening performance, slaughter and carcass characteristics of Pekin ducks. Hasad Hayv Derg 2008; 23: 50–54 (article in Turkish with an English abstract). Erisir Z, Poyraz O, Onbasilar EE, Erdem E, Oksuztepe GA. Effects of housing system, swimming pool and slaughter age on duck performance, carcass and meat characteristics. J Anim Vet Adv, 2009; 8: 1864–1869. European Commission. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Expert Group for Technical Advice on Organic Production. Report on Poultry. 20–21 June 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/orhanic/files/eu-policy/ expert-recommendations/expert_group/poultry_report_ version_expertsGroup.pdf. Date of access: 17.04.2013. National Research Council Subcommittee on Poultry Nutrition. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press, 1994.
  4. Pingel H, Wicke M, Lengerken GV. Gewinnung und Qualität von Geglügelfleisch. In: Branscheid W, Honikel KO, Lengerken GV, Troeger K, editors. Qualitöt von Fleisch und Fleischwaren. Germany: Deutscher Fachverlag; 1998. pp. 301–338. Barbut S. Poultry Products Processing: An Industry Guide. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2002. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows. Release 12.0 Standard version. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS Inc, 2003. Alpay F. Ördeklerde kuluçkalık yumurta ağırlığı ve depolama süresinin kuluçka sonuçları, civcivlerde büyüme performansı ile kesim ve karkas özellikleri üzerine etkisi. PhD Thesis, Uludağ University Graduate School of Health Science, Bursa, Turkey, 2008. (in Turkish) Arslan C, Citil M, Sa