Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

Repeated superovulation treatments in Kivircik ewes during breeding and nonbreeding seasons

Pages
480–484
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that 2 consecutive in vivo embryo production programs can be successfully applied in Kivircik ewes with suitable superovulation treatments and operation techniques, irrespective of the season.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study compared superovulation and embryo recovery rates applied repeatedly during breeding and nonbreeding seasons in the same 20 Kivircik sheep.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Trials 1 and 3 were performed during the breeding season and the trial 2 was performed in the nonbreeding season.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, our study demonstrated that 2 consecutive in vivo embryo production programs can be successfully applied in Kivircik ewes with suitable superovulation treatments and operation techniques, irrespective of the season.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sheep · superovulation · embryo

Abstract

The present study compared superovulation and embryo recovery rates applied repeatedly during breeding and nonbreeding seasons in the same 20 Kivircik sheep. Trials 1 and 3 were performed during the breeding season and the trial 2 was performed in the nonbreeding season. We synchronized the sheep's estrus cycles and induced a superovulatory response with porcine follicle stimulating hormone (pFSH) injections. Natural mating took place 12 h after the last FSH injection. The embryos were collected by laparotomy 7 days after natural mating. There was no significant difference between the number of corpora lutea (CL) counted following the 1st (breeding) and 2nd (nonbreeding) superovulatory treatments (P > 0.05). However, the number of CL in the 3rd (breeding) treatment was dramatically lower than that in the other groups (P < 0.001). Recovery rates showed significant differences among embryo flushing treatments (P < 0.001). The number of morulae + blastocysts and freezable-quality embryos decreased considerably for the 3rd flushing treatment (P < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between the 1st and 2nd flushing treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that 2 consecutive in vivo embryo production programs can be successfully applied in Kivircik ewes with suitable superovulation treatments and operation techniques, irrespective of the season.

Özet

The present study compared superovulation and embryo recovery rates applied repeatedly during breeding and nonbreeding seasons in the same 20 Kivircik sheep. Trials 1 and 3 were performed during the breeding season and the trial 2 was performed in the nonbreeding season. We synchronized the sheep's estrus cycles and induced a superovulatory response with porcine follicle stimulating hormone (pFSH) injections. Natural mating took place 12 h after the last FSH injection. The embryos were collected by laparotomy 7 days after natural mating. There was no significant difference between the number of corpora lutea (CL) counted following the 1st (breeding) and 2nd (nonbreeding) superovulatory treatments (P > 0.05). However, the number of CL in the 3rd (breeding) treatment was dramatically lower than that in the other groups (P < 0.001). Recovery rates showed significant differences among embryo flushing treatments (P < 0.001). The number of morulae + blastocysts and freezable-quality embryos decreased considerably for the 3rd flushing treatment (P < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between the 1st and 2nd flushing treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that 2 consecutive in vivo embryo production programs can be successfully applied in Kivircik ewes with suitable superovulation treatments and operation techniques, irrespective of the season.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSTÜNER, B., ALÇAY, S., NAK, Y., NUR, Z. (2014). Repeated superovulation treatments in Kivircik ewes during breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 480–484. https://ajindex.com/articles/121459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arat S. In vitro conservation and preliminary molecular identification of some Turkish domestic animal genetic resources-I (Turkhaygen-I). In: Proceedings of the 8th Global Conference on the Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources. Tekirdağ, Turkey: 2011. pp. 51–58.
  2. Aghdam HR, Birler S, Alkan S, Pabucçuoğlu S. Kıvırcık ırkı koyunlarda mevsim içi ve dışı östrus senkronizasyonu ve embriyo transfer çalışmaları. J Fac Vet Med Univ İstanbul 2002; 28: 475–487 (article in Turkish with an English abstract). Mitchell LM, Dingwall WS, Mylne MJA, Hunton J, Matthews K, Gebbie FE, McCallum GJ, McEvoy TG. Season affects characteristics of the pre-ovulatory LH surge and embryo viability in superovulated ewes. Anim Reprod Sci 2002; 74: 162–174. 9. Gherardi PB, Lindsay DR. The effect of season on the ovulatory response of Merino ewes to serum from pregnant mares. J Reprod Fertile 1980; 60: 425–429.
  3. Forcada F, Abecia JA, Cebrián-Pérez JA, Muiňo-Blanco T, Valares JA, Palacin I, Casao A. The effect of melatonin implants during the seasonal anestrus on embryo production after superovulation in aged high-prolificacy Rasa Aragonesa ewes. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 356–365.
  4. Cognie Y, Baril G, Poulin N, Mermillod P. Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goats. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 171–188. Armstrong DT. Factors affecting superovulation success. Embryo Trans Newslet 1991; 9: 11–17.
  5. Vivanco HM, Greaney KB, Varela H. Explaining the variability in superovulatory responses and yield of transferable embryos in sheep embryo transfer. Theriogenology 1994; 41: 329 (Abstract). Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Baird DT, Campbell BK, Cocero MJ, Garcia-Garcia RM, Inskeep EK, Lopez-Sebastian A, McNeilly AS, Santiago-Moreno J, Souza CJH et al. Multiple factors affecting the efficiency of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in sheep and goats. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16: 421– 425. Shipley CFB, Buckrell BC, Mylne MJA, Pollard J, Hunton JR. Artificial insemination and embryo transfer in sheep. In: Youngquist RS, Threlfall WR, editors. Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 2007. pp. 629–641.
  6. Torres S, Sevellec C. Repeated superovulation and surgical recovery of embryos in the ewe. Reprod Nutr Dev 1987; 27: 859–863.
  7. McKelvey WAC, Robinson JJ, Aitken RP. A simplified technique for the transfer of ovine embryos by laparoscopy. Vet Rec 1985; 117: 492–494.
  8. Ishwar AK, Memon MA. Embryo transfer in sheep and goats: a review. Small Rumin Res 1996; 19: 35–43.