Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

Textural acceptability of prepared fish sausages by controlling textural indicators

Pages
364–368
Publication Date
2015-08-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the TPA and firmness values, some textural indicators were found significantly weak (P < 0.05), but they met consumers preferences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to verify the textural quality and acceptability of two different prepared emulsion-type fish sausages that were evaluated by using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and saithe (Pollachius virens) fillets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Texture properties of the fish sausages were compared with three different emulsion-type sausages (chicken, turkey, and beef sausages) using texture profile analysis (TPA), shear test, Kramer shear test, pate penetration test, cooking loss, and expressible moisture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the TPA and firmness values, some textural indicators were found significantly weak (P < 0.05), but they met consumers preferences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fish sausage · hardness · firmness

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to verify the textural quality and acceptability of two different prepared emulsion-type fish sausages that were evaluated by using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and saithe (Pollachius virens) fillets. Texture properties of the fish sausages were compared with three different emulsion-type sausages (chicken, turkey, and beef sausages) using texture profile analysis (TPA), shear test, Kramer shear test, pate penetration test, cooking loss, and expressible moisture. According to the TPA and firmness values, some textural indicators were found significantly weak (P < 0.05), but they met consumers preferences.

Özet

The purpose of this paper is to verify the textural quality and acceptability of two different prepared emulsion-type fish sausages that were evaluated by using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and saithe (Pollachius virens) fillets. Texture properties of the fish sausages were compared with three different emulsion-type sausages (chicken, turkey, and beef sausages) using texture profile analysis (TPA), shear test, Kramer shear test, pate penetration test, cooking loss, and expressible moisture. According to the TPA and firmness values, some textural indicators were found significantly weak (P < 0.05), but they met consumers preferences.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇER, M. T., ÇAKLI, Ş. (2015). Textural acceptability of prepared fish sausages by controlling textural indicators. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 364–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/121396

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Wang P, Xu X, Zhou G. Effect of meat and phosphate level on water-holding capacity and texture of emulsion-type sausage during storage. Agricult Sci China 2009; 8: 1475–1481.
  2. Dai RT, Wu GQ. Analysis of existing problems and the principle of processing emulsion-type sausage. Sci Technol Food Industry 2000; 21: 21–23.
  3. Andres SC, Garcia ME, Zaritzky NE, Califano AN. Storage stability of low-fat chicken sausages. J Food Eng 2006; 72: 311– 319. Dincer T, Cakli S. Textural and sensory properties of fish sausage from rainbow trout. J Aqua Food Prod Technol 2010; 19: 238–248.
  4. Dincer T, Cakli S, Kilinc B. Fish sausage production by using saithe (Pollachius virens) fillets and controlling the microbiological and chemical quality in cool storage. In: Proceedings of the 14th National Fisheries Symposium, Muğla, Turkey; 2007. p. 190. Sikorski Z, Pan BS. Preservation of seafood quality. In: Shahidi F, Botta JR, editors. Seafoods: Chemistry, Processing Technology and Quality. Glasgow, UK: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1994. pp. 168–195.
  5. Sawyer CA, Biglari SD, Thompson SS. Internal end temperature and survival of bacteria on meats with and without a polyvinyl chloride wrap during microwave cooking. J Food Sci 1984; 49: 972–974. Botta JR. Instrument for non-destructive texture measurement of raw Atlantic cod fillets. J Food Sci 1991; 56: 962–964.
  6. Dinçer T, Çaklı Ş. Fish Sausage Production. Patent No. TR 2009 02207B, 2012. Republic of Turkey National Patent. Schubring R. Texture measurement on gutted cod during storage in ice using a hand-held instrument. Inf Fischwirtsch Fischereiforsch 2002; 49: 25–27.
  7. Su YK, Bowers JA, Zayas JF. Physical characteristics and microstructure of reduced-fat frankfurters as affected by salt and emulsified fats stabilized with nonmeat proteins. J Food Sci 2000; 65: 123–128.
  8. Kao WT, Lin KW. Quality of reduced-fat frankfurter modified by konjac–starch mixed gels. J Food Sci 2006; 71: 326–332. Smewing J. Texture analysis. Meat Inter 1996; 6: 37–38.
  9. Lee CM, Chung KH. Analysis of surimi gel properties by compression and penetration tests. J Texture Stud 1989; 20: 363–377.
  10. LeBlanc RJ, LeBlanc EL. The effect of super chilling with CO2 snow on the quality of commercially processed cod (Gadus morhua) and winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) fillets. In: Huss HH, Jacobsen M, Liston J, editors. Quality Assurance in the Fish Industry. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1995. pp. 115–124.
  11. Boles JA, Swan JE. Effect of pos