SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3

The relationship between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement

Fatma Çiloğlan
Mehmet Bardakçı
Pages
1204–1214
Publication Date
2019-10-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that there is a weak statistically significant positive correlation between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement of learners of English as a foreign language in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of female participants was 120, and that of the male participants was 205.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that there is a weak statistically significant positive correlation between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement of learners of English as a foreign language in Turkey.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Intercultural sensitivity · English language proficiency · language achievement

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt. The relationship between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement The present descriptive study aims to investigate whether there is a relationship between intercultural sensitivity and language achievement of learners of EFL in Turkey. To this aim, the quantitative research methodology was used. The number of female participants was 120, and that of the male participants was 205. A total of 325 participants who were attending preparatory school at a state university were selected using cluster random sampling. The “Intercultural Sensitivity Scale” developed by Chen and Starosta (2000) was used to obtain the quantitative data. The findings indicated that there is a weak statistically significant positive correlation between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement of learners of English as a foreign language in Turkey. However, there was a significant difference between the intercultural sensitivity scores of the participants regarding the English language proficiency levels. The results showed that the higher the proficiency level, the greater the intercultural sensitivity scores are. Additionally, findings indicated that there was not a significant difference between intercultural sensitivity scores of the female and male participants Information about Author(s)* Author 1 Author (Last name, First name) Fatma, Çiloğlan Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address [email protected] Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author. Author 2 Author (Last name, First name) Bardakçı, Mehmet Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address [email protected] Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No) Author 3 Author (Last name, First name) Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No) Author 4 Author (Last name, First name) Affiliated institution (University) Country Email address Department & Rank Corresponding author (Yes/No)

🔖

Cite This Article

Çiloğlan, F., Bardakçı, M. (2019). The relationship between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 1204–1214. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT journal, 56(1), 57-64.
  2. Bayyurt, Y. (2013). Current perspectives on sociolinguistics and English language education. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 69-78.
  3. Bennett, M. J. 1998. “Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Bennett, M. J., & Paige, R. M. (1993). Education for the intercultural experience. Towards ethnorelativism: a developmental model of intercultural sensitivity, 21-71. Bennett, M.J. 1993 “Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity.” In Yarmouth, ME: Education for the intercultural experience, edited by R.M. Paige, 21-71. Intercultural Press.
  5. Bhawuk, D. P., & Brislin, R. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International journal of intercultural relations, 16(4), 413-436.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  7. Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching. A practical introduction for teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  8. Chen, G. M. (1997). A review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity.
  9. Chen, G. M. 2010. “A Study of Intercultural Communication Competence.” China Review: Academic Publishers.
  10. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. (1998). A review of the concept of intercultural awareness.
  11. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 353-383.
  12. Chen, G. M., &Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale.
  13. Cherniss, C., Goleman, D., Emmerling, R., Cowan, K., & Adler, M. (1998). Bringing emotional intelligence to the workplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations, Rutgers University.
  14. Cushner, K., &Brislin, R. W. (1996). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide (Vol. 9). Sage publications.
  15. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of studies in international education, 10(3), 241-266.
  16. Engle, L., & Engle, J. (2004). Assessing language acquisition and intercultural sensitivity development in relation to study abroad program design. Frontiers: The interdisciplinary journal of study abroad, 10, 219-236.
  17. Gudykunst, W. B., & Hammer, M. R. (1983). Basic training design: Approaches to intercultural training. Handbook of intercultural training: Issues in theory and design, 1, 118-154.
  18. Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International journal of intercultural relations, 27(4), 421-443.
  19. Hart, R. P., Carlson, R. E., & Eadie, W. F. (1980). Attitudes toward communication and the assessment of rhetorical sensitivity. Communications Monographs, 47(1), 1-22.
  20. Jackson, J. (2011). Host language proficiency, intercultural sensitivity, and study abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 21, 167-188.
  21. Kural, F., & Bayyurt, Y. (2016). The implementation of an intercultural competence syllabus to prepare study-abroad students for global communication. Educational Studies, 42(4), 378-393.
  22. Lo Bianco, J., Liddicoat, A. J., & Crozet, C. (1999). Striving for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education. Melbourne: Language Australia.
  23. MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
  24. Patterson, S. C., & Mughan, A. (1999). Senates: bicameralism in the contemporary world. Ohio State Univ Pr.
  25. Penbek, Ş., Yurdakul Şahin, D., & Cerit, A. G. (2012). Intercultural communication competence: A study about the intercultural sensitivity of university students based on their education and international experiences. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 11(2), 232-252.
  26. Saricoban, A., & Oz, H. (2014). Research into pre-service English teachers’ intercultural communicative competence (ICC) in Turkish context. The Anthropologist, 18(2), 523-531.
  27. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods knowledge base.
  28. Vila Banos, R. (2006). The Affective Dimension of Intercultural Communication Competence In Compulsory Secondary Education: Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. Rie-Revista De InvestigacionEducativa, 24(2), 353-372.
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior. Soviet psychology, 17(4), 3-35.
  30. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
  31. Wertsch, J. V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, culture, and activity, 1(4), 202-208.Vygotsky, L. S. 1979. “Consciousness as a Problem in the Psychology of Behavior.” Soviet Psychology 17(4): 3-35.