SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Evaluation of the Medical Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Awareness Level of Emergency Healthcare Professionals Serving on Different Centres

R. Koray Eyison(University of Health Sciences, Medical CBRN Defense, Ankara, Turkey)
Ahu Pakdemirli(University of Health Sciences, Gulhane School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Ankara, Turkey)
Erkan Aydin(Cankiri State Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cankiri, Turkey)
Ayla Sayin Ozturk(Gevher Nesibe Technical High School, Ankara, Turkey)
Zahir Kiliç(Turkish Land Forces, Ankara, Turkey)
Burak Demirbag(Turkish Air Force, Diyarbakir, Turkey)
Mesut Ortatatli(University of Health Sciences, Medical CBRN Defense, Ankara, Turkey)
Sermet Sezigen(University of Health Sciences, Medical CBRN Defense, Ankara, Turkey)
Levent Kenar(University of Health Sciences, Medical CBRN Defense, Ankara, Turkey)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All data were evaluated statistically in order to obtain mean awareness score MAS of participants and institutions.Results: It was found that MAS of the whole participants is 7.62±3.92.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the medical chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear CBRN awareness of emergency healthcare professionals from two different centres.Methods: The survey was conducted among 67 healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics from two emergency departments of two different cities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All data were evaluated statistically in order to obtain mean awareness score MAS of participants and institutions.Results: It was found that MAS of the whole participants is 7.62±3.92.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference observed between MAS of Training and Research Hospital 6.75±3.97 and State Hospital 8.64±3.65 p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CBRN · awareness · preparedness

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the medical chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear CBRN awareness of emergency healthcare professionals from two different centres.Methods: The survey was conducted among 67 healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics from two emergency departments of two different cities. A questionnaire that was designed in order to evaluate demographic data age, gender, job description, education level and knowledge/experience about medical CBRN was filled by participants during the face-toface interviews. All data were evaluated statistically in order to obtain mean awareness score MAS of participants and institutions.Results: It was found that MAS of the whole participants is 7.62±3.92. There was a statistically significant difference observed between MAS of Training and Research Hospital 6.75±3.97 and State Hospital 8.64±3.65 p

🔖

Cite This Article

Eyison, R. K., Pakdemirli, A., Aydin, E., Ozturk, A. S., Kiliç, Z., Demirbag, B., Ortatatli, M., Sezigen, S., Kenar, L. (2020). Evaluation of the Medical Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Awareness Level of Emergency Healthcare Professionals Serving on Different Centres. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Volume: 4 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.2020.1037

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Carus WS. Bioterrorism and Biocrimes: the illicit use of biological agents since 1900. Washington, D.C.: The Minerva Group, Inc.; 2002.
  2. Okumura T, Hisaoka T, Yamada A, et al. The Tokyo subway sarin attack--lessons learned. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005;207:471–476. [CrossRef]
  3. Sandstrom BE, Eriksson H, Norlander L, Thorstensson M, Cassel G. Training of public health personnel in handling CBRN emergencies: a table-top exercise card concept. Environ Int 2014;72:164–169. [CrossRef]
  4. Cornish P. The CBRN system: assessing the threat of terrorist use of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons in the United Kingdom. UK: Royal Institute of International Affairs; 2007. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/ International%20Security/cbrn0207.pdf
  5. Mayer K, Wallenius M, Ray I. Nuclear forensics --a methodology providing clues on the origin of illicitly trafficked nuclear materials. Analyst 2005;130:433–441. [CrossRef]
  6. Bozbıyık A, Özdemir Ç, Hancı İH. Radyasyon yaralanmaları ve korunma yöntemleri. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Derg 2002;11:272–274. https://www.ttb.org.tr/STED/sted0702/radyasyon.pdf
  7. Colella M, Thomson S, Macintosh S, Logan. An introduction to radiological terrorism. Australian J Emerg Manage 2005;20:9–17. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUJlEmMgmt/2005/16.pdf
  8. Mortelmans LJ, Van Boxstael S, De Cauwer HG, Sabbe MB. Preparedness of Belgian civil hospitals for chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear incidents: are we there yet? Eur J Emerg Med 2014;21:296–300. [CrossRef]
  9. Uzumcu A. The Chemical Weapons Convention --disarmament, science and technology. Anal Bioanal Chem 2014;406:5071–5073. [CrossRef]
  10. Olivieri C, Ingrassia PL, Della Corte F, et al. Hospital preparedness and response in CBRN emergencies: TIER assessment tool. Eur J Emerg Med 2017;24:366–370. [CrossRef]
  11. Sorensen B, Zane R, Wante B, Rao M, Bortolin M, Rockenschaub G; World Health Organization (WHO). Hospital emergency response checklist: an all-hazards tool for hospital administrators and emergency managers; 2011. https://www.who.int/docs/default- source/documents/publications/hospital-emergency-response- checklist.pdf
  12. Niska RW, Shimizu IM. Hospital preparedness for emergency response: United States, 2008. Natl Health Stat Report 2011;(37):1– 14. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr037.pdf
  13. Chaput CJ, Deluhery MR, Stake CE, Martens KA, Cichon ME. Disaster training for prehospital providers. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007;11:458– 465. [CrossRef]
  14. Davidson RK, Magalini S, Brattekas K, et al. Preparedness for chemical crisis situations: experiences from European medical response exercises. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2019;23:1239–1247. [CrossRef]
  15. Kako M, Hammad K, Mitani S, Arbon P. Existing Approaches to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Education and Training for Health Professionals: Findings from an Integrative Literature Review. Prehosp Disaster Med 2018;33:182–190. [CrossRef]
  16. Mortelmans LJM, Gaakeer MI, Dieltiens G, Anseeuw K, Sabbe MB. Are Dutch Hospitals Prepared for Chemical, Biological, or Radionuclear Incidents? A Survey Study. Prehosp Disaster Med 2017;32:483–491. [CrossRef]
  17. Jama TJ, Kuisma MJ. Preparedness of Finnish Emergency Medical Services for Chemical Emergencies. Prehosp Disaster Med 2016;31:392–396. [CrossRef]
  18. Biological and chemical terrorism: strategic plan for preparedness and response. Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup. MMWR Recomm Rep 2000;49:1–14. https://www.cdc. gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4904a1.htm