SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Validity and Reliability of The Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale in Persons with Neck and Back Pain

Zuhal Abasıyanık(Izmir Katip Celebi University)0000-0003-3086-8102
Yusuf Emük(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4128-4340
Seviye Çifitci(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0008-4459-3019
Turhan Kahraman(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8776-0664
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The SKS is a simple and feasible screening tool for kinesiophobia but should be used alongside comprehensive measures due to its moderate psychometric properties and limitations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Kinesiophobia is a significant concern in persons with neck and back pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 101 participants (n=38 with neck pain and n=63 with back pain) were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The SKS is a simple and feasible screening tool for kinesiophobia but should be used alongside comprehensive measures due to its moderate psychometric properties and limitations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kinesiophobia · Pain · Neck Pain

Abstract

Purpose: Kinesiophobia is a significant concern in persons with neck and back pain. This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of the Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale (SKS) including test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Material and Methods: A total of 101 participants (n=38 with neck pain and n=63 with back pain) were included. The SKS was applied twice 7-14 days apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was examined through correlations with established measures: the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TKS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during activity and rest, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Floor/ceiling effects and score distribution were also analyzed. Results: The SKS demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability [neck pain: ICC=0.56 (95%CI: 0.30–0.75), back pain: 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31–0.68)] in the back pain group. It demonstrated moderate correlations with the TKS (rho=0.446-0.555) but small correlations with the VAS (rho=0.261–0.265) and ODI (rho=0.278) in the back pain group. No significant correlations were found between the SKS and VAS or NDI in the neck pain group. Conclusion: The SKS is a simple and feasible screening tool for kinesiophobia but should be used alongside comprehensive measures due to its moderate psychometric properties and limitations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Abasıyanık, Z., Emük, Y., Çifitci, S., Kahraman, T. (2025). Validity and Reliability of The Single-Item Kinesiophobia Scale in Persons with Neck and Back Pain. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1630633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: A new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Management. 1990; 3:35–43.
  2. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain 2000;85(3):317–332.
  3. Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van Damme S, Vlaeyen JWS, Karoly P. Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: The next generation. Clin J Pain 2012;28(6):475–483.
  4. Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 2007;30(1):77–94.
  5. Luque-Suarez A, Martinez-Calderon J, Falla D. Role of kinesiophobia on pain, disability and quality of life in people suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2019;53(9):554–559.
  6. Alschuler KN, Hoodin F, Murphy SL, et al. Factors contributing to physical activity in a chronic low back pain clinical sample: A comprehensive analysis using continuous ambulatory monitoring. Pain 2011;152(11):2521–2527.
  7. Uluğ N, Yakut Y, Alemdaroğlu İ, Yılmaz Ö. Comparison of pain, kinesiophobia and quality of life in patients with low back and neck pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2016;28(2):665–670.
  8. Antunes RS, Macedo BG de, Amaral T da S, Gomes H de A, Pereira LSM, Rocha FL. Pain, kinesiophobia and quality of life in chronic low back pain and depression. Acta Ortop Bras 2013;21(1):27–29.
  9. Picavet HSJ. Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia: Predictors of Chronic Low Back Pain. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156(11):1028–1034.
  10. Gunay Ucurum S. The relationship between pain severity, kinesiophobia, and quality of life in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2019;32(5):677–683.
  11. Soysal M, Kara B, Arda MN. Assessment of physical activity in patients with chronic low back or neck pain. Turk Neurosurg 2013;23(1):75–80.
  12. Varallo, G., Scarpina, F., Giusti, E. M., Cattivelli, R., Guerrini Usubini, A., Capodaglio, P., & Castelnuovo, G. Does kinesiophobia mediate the relationship between pain intensity and disability in individuals with chronic low-back pain and obesity? Brain sciences 2021;11(6), 684.
  13. Dupuis F, Cherif A, Batcho C, Massé-Alarie H, Roy JS. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia: A Systematic Review of Its Psychometric Properties in People with Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin J Pain 2023;39(5):236-247.
  14. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain 2005;117(1-2):137-44.
  15. Knapik A, Saulicz E, Gnat R. Kinesiophobia- introducing a new diagnostic tool. J Hum Kinet 2011;28:25-31.
  16. Verwoerd AJH, Luijsterburg PAJ, Timman R, Koes BW, Verhagen AP. A single question was as predictive of outcome as the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in people with sciatica: an observational study. J Physiother 2012; 58(4):249–254.
  17. Kline P. Psychometrics and psychology. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1979.
  18. Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research 2018;27(5):1171–1179.
  19. Tunca Yilmaz Oznur, Yakut Yavuz, Uygur Fatma, Ulug Naime. Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 2011;22(1):44–49.
  20. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek İE, Yagli N. The Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of Neck Disability Index in Patients with Neck Pain A Turkish Version Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(11):362–365.
  21. Fairbank J, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(22):2940–2953.
  22. Yakut E, Düger T, Öksüz Ç, et al. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index for Patients with Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(5):581–585.
  23. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975;1(4):379–384.
  24. Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
  25. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (Effect sizes ANOVA and Pearsons Coefficents). Vol. 3. 1988.
  26. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research 1995;4(4):293–307.
  27. Linton SJ, Shaw WS. Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther 2011;91(5):700–711.
  28. Bilgin S, Cetin H, Karakaya J, Kose N. Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Predisposing to Kinesiophobia in Persons with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2019;42(8):565–571.