SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Frontal-Plane Postural Angle Changes Between Double-Leg and Single-Leg Stance in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Associations with Spinal Mobility and Core Endurance

Uğur Verep(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2701-0105
Eren Yıldız(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0000-6964-8102
Gülce Yüksel(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0005-8886-4421
Özkan Urak(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7685-1069
İsmail Sarı(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7737-4180
Seher Özyürek(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8586-7214
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings reflect endpoint alignment rather than continuous compensatory movement strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To investigate frontal-plane shoulder and pelvic angle changes between double-leg and single-leg stance in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and to examine their associations with core endurance and clinical parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 55 patients with axSpA (categorized as non-radiographic axSpA, radiographic axSpA without spinal structural involvement, or radiographic axSpA with spinal structural involvement) and 19 healthy controls were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings reflect endpoint alignment rather than continuous compensatory movement strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:axial spondyloarthritis · postural control · core endurance

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate frontal-plane shoulder and pelvic angle changes between double-leg and single-leg stance in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and to examine their associations with core endurance and clinical parameters. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 55 patients with axSpA (categorized as non-radiographic axSpA, radiographic axSpA without spinal structural involvement, or radiographic axSpA with spinal structural involvement) and 19 healthy controls were evaluated. Core endurance was assessed using flexor, extensor, and bilateral side bridge tests. Angle changes were evaluated using a two-dimensional mobile posture analysis system. Results: Extensor endurance was significantly lower in patients with radiographic axSpA with spinal structural involvement group than in controls (adjusted p=0.010). Frontal-plane shoulder and pelvic angle changes did not differ between groups (p>0.05) and were not associated with core endurance or clinical parameters. Weak correlations were observed between right-stance shoulder angle change and selected spinal mobility measures. Conclusion: Endpoint frontal-plane shoulder and pelvic angle changes were not detectably altered in axSpA. These findings reflect endpoint alignment rather than continuous compensatory movement strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Verep, U., Yıldız, E., Yüksel, G., Urak, Ö., Sarı, İ., Özyürek, S. (2026). Frontal-Plane Postural Angle Changes Between Double-Leg and Single-Leg Stance in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Associations with Spinal Mobility and Core Endurance. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Volume: 10 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1976709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2017;390(10089):73-84.
  2. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):978-91.
  3. Soulard J, Vaillant J, Agier C-T, et al. Gait characteristics in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39(1):173-86.
  4. Dursun N, Sarkaya S, Ozdolap S, et al. Risk of Falls in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2015;21(2):76-80.
  5. Aydoğ E, Depedibi R, Bal A, et al. Dynamic postural balance in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(4):445-8.
  6. Oliveira TL, Silva FD, Filho AGO, et al. Relationship between spinal structural damage and sagittal balance in axial spondyloarthritis: Is the thoracic spine the starting point? Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024;65:152415.
  7. Durmus B, Altay Z, Ersoy Y, et al. Postural stability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1156-62.
  8. Batur E, Karataş G. Do postural changes affect balance in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(5):437-40.
  9. Lee JS, Suh KT, Kim JI, et al. Analysis of Sagittal Balance of Ankylosing Spondylitis Using Spinopelvic Parameters. Clin Spine Surg. 2014;27(3):E94-E8.
  10. Emel Ece Özcan E, Esra Gr, Yeliz Bahar Ör, et al. A Preliminary Study on the Correlation Between Spinopelvic Parameters and Balance in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Arch Rheumatol. 2019;34(1):018-25.
  11. Acar Y, Ilçin N, Gürpinar B, et al. Core stability and balance in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(8):1389-96.
  12. Szucs KA, Brown EVD. Rater reliability and construct validity of a mobile application for posture analysis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(1):31-6.
  13. McEvoy MP, Grimmer K. Reliability of upright posture measurements in primary school children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1).
  14. Ruivo RM, Pezarat-Correia P, Carita AI. Cervical and shoulder postural assessment of adolescents between 15 and 17 years old and association with upper quadrant pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(4):364-71.
  15. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):777-83.
  16. Malaviya AN, Rawat R, Agrawal N, et al. The Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, the Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis: The Tangled Skein of Rheumatology. Int J Rheumatol. 2017;2017:1-9.
  17. Slobodin G, Sagiv M, Khreish T, et al. Facet joint disease in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: A retrospective computed tomography study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022;55:151991.
  18. Hebeisen M, Micheroli R, Scherer A, et al. Spinal radiographic progression in axial spondyloarthritis and the impact of classification as nonradiographic versus radiographic disease: Data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0230268.
  19. Lukas C, Landewé R, Sieper J, et al. Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(1):18.
  20. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(12):2281-5.
  21. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(12):2286-91.
  22. Kiltz U, van der Heijde D, Boonen A, et al. Development of a health index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (ASAS HI): final result of a global initiative based on the ICF guided by ASAS. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(5):830-5.
  23. McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: Clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(8):941-4.
  24. Reiman MP, Krier AD, Nelson JA, et al. Comparison of different trunk endurance testing methods in college-aged individuals. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(5):533-9.
  25. Hopkins BB, Vehrs PR, Fellingham GW, et al. Validity and Reliability of Standing Posture Measurements Using a Mobile Application. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019;42(2):132-40.
  26. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):135.
  27. Dunn OJ. Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics. 1964;6(3):241-52.
  28. Armstrong RA. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5):502-8.
  29. Soulard J, Vaillant J, Baillet A, et al. Gait and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Comparative Gait Analysis Study Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(11):e27087.
  30. Türk E, Yurdakul FG, Güler T, et al. Posture, balance and gait in axial spondyloarthritis: a case-control study. Rheumatol Int. 2024;44(11):2527-38.
  31. Mirza Y, Anaforoğlu B, Düger T, et al. Trunk position sense, spine posture and static postural sway in axial spondyloarthritis patients: Relation to disease metrology, activity and functional status. Egypt Rheumatol. 2024;46(3):142-6.
  32. Desmyttere G, Ralandison S, Dusfour G, et al. A combined analysis of spinal mobility and gait spatiotemporal parameters in axial spondyloarthritis using wearable sensors. Clin Biomech. 2025;126:106555.
  33. Cigercioglu N, Bazancir-Apaydin Z, Baltaci G, et al. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution patterns of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and asymptomatic healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Ir J Med Sci. 2025;194(6):2201-9.
  34. McGill SM. Low Back Stability: From Formal Description to Issues for Performance and Rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29(1):26-31.
  35. Gardiner PV, Small D, Muñoz-Esquivel K, et al. Validity and reliability of a sensor-based electronic spinal mobility index for axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(11):3415-23.