Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2

Fetal Anomalilerde Beta-2 Mikroglobulin Düzeyleri ve Pre·Postnatal Ultrasonografi ile Tanı ve Takip

Pages
345–353
Publication Date
2019-06-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Çalışmamızda, fetal anomalilerin tanı ve takibinde ultrasonografi ve serum beta-2 mikroglobulin düzeyinin rolünü araştırdık. 

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Son yıllarda fetal anomalilerin prenatal tanı ve takibinde önemli ilerlemeler olmuştur .
📊
Key Findings & Data:Amaç: Son yıllarda fetal anomalilerin prenatal tanı ve takibinde önemli ilerlemeler olmuştur .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Çalışmamızda, fetal anomalilerin tanı ve takibinde ultrasonografi ve serum beta-2 mikroglobulin düzeyinin rolünü araştırdık. 
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fetal anomali · ultrasonografi

Özet

Amaç: Son yıllarda fetal anomalilerin prenatal tanı ve takibinde önemli ilerlemeler olmuştur . Çalışmamızda, fetal anomalilerin tanı ve takibinde ultrasonografi ve serum beta-2 mikroglobulin düzeyinin rolünü araştırdık. 

🔖

Cite This Article

Basuguy, E., Önen, A., Yalınkaya, A., Yayla, M. (2019). Fetal Anomalilerde Beta-2 Mikroglobulin Düzeyleri ve Pre·Postnatal Ultrasonografi ile Tanı ve Takip. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.574992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Campbell S, Harrington K. Prenatal diagnosis. Current Opinion Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 5: 167- 9.
  2. Alton ME, Dechemey AH. Prenatal Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 114- 20.
  3. Neyzi O, Ertuğrul T. Doğumsal Anomaliler. 2002; 3. Baskı, I. Cilt Nobel Tıp Kitapevi, Pediatri s:157.
  4. Campbell S, Pearce JM. Ultrasound visualization of congenital malformations.Br Med Bull. 1983; 39: 322-31.
  5. Campbell P, Smith P. Routine screening for congenital abnormalitise by ultrasound.Prenatal Diagnosis pp. 1884; 325-30.
  6. Shirley IM, Bottomley F, Robinson VP. Routine radiographic screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk population. Br J Radiol. 1992; 65: 564-9.
  7. Lys F, Dewal P, Borlee-Grime I, et all. Evaluation routine ultrasound examination for prenatal diagnosis of malformation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989; 30: 101-9.
  8. Manchester DK, Pretorius DH, Avery C, et all. Accuracy of ultrasound diagnoses in pregnancies complicated by suspected fetal anomalities. Prenat Diagn. 1988; 8: 109-17.
  9. Carrera JM: Prenatal diagnosis today. J Perinat Med 1991; 19: 35-41.
  10. Rottom S, Bronshtein M: Transvaginal sonographics diagnosis of congenital anomalies between 9 weeks and 16 weeks menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990; 18: 307- 14.
  11. Timor-Tritsch IE, Farine D, Rosen MA. A close look at early embriyonic development with the high frequency transvaginal transducer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159: 676-82.
  12. Magriples U, Joshua A Copel. Accurate detection of anomalies by routine ultrasonography in an indigent clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179: 978-81.
  13. Gonçalves LF, Jeanty P, Piper JM. The accuracy of ultrasonography in detecting congenital malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171: 1606-12.
  14. Boyd PA, Rounding C, Chamberlain P, et all. The evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and its impact on an unselected population over an18-year period. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 1131–40.
  15. Edwards L, Hui L. First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;23: 102-11.
  16. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, et all. A randomized trial of perinatal ultrasound screening in a low risk population impact on perinatal outcome. N Eng J Med. 1993; 329: 812- 7.
  17. De Lia JE, Cruikshank DP. Fetiside versus laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170-1480.
  18. Myrianthopoulos NC, Chung CS. Congenital malformations in singletons epidemiologic survey. In: Bergman O (ed.) Birth Defects. Newyork: Stratton Inter Count Med Book Corp. Am J Med Gen. 1974; 11: 1-22.
  19. Myrianthopoulos NC. Congenital anomalies mortality and morbidity burden and classification. Am J Med Gen. 1987;27: 505-23.
  20. Cheng WL, Hsiao CH, Tseng HW, et all. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug; 54: 343-9.
  21. Ludomirski A, Weiner S. Percutaneous fetal umblical blood sampling. Clin obstet gynecol. 1988; 31: 19-26.
  22. Pielet BW, Socol MI, MacGregor SN, et all. Cordocentesis: An apprasial of risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159: 1497-500.
  23. Nicolaides KH, Ermiş H. Kordosentez. Prenatal tanı ve Tedavi. I. Baskı. Aydınlı K (ed), Perspektiv İstanbul 1992; 66-84.
  24. Cobet G, Gummelt T, Bollmann R. Assesment of serum levels of alpha1 - microglobulin, beta- 2 microglobulin, and retinol binding protein in the fetal blood. A method for prenatal evaluation of renal function. Prenatal diagnosis. 1996; 16: 299-305.
  25. Alton ME, Dechemey AH. Prenatal Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 114- 20.
  26. Carrera JM: Prenatal diagnosis today. J Perinat Med 1991; 19: 35-41.