SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2

Inter-stimulus Interval Effect on Tactile Habituation: An Electrophysiological Approach

Güliz Akın0000-0002-9612-6577
Çağdaş Güdücü0000-0002-7735-4048
Pages
327–333
Publication Date
2019-06-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: The current study aims to investigate different inter-stimulus interval effect on habituation process by using non-painful tactile stimuli. 

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The current study aims to investigate different inter-stimulus interval effect on habituation process by using non-painful tactile stimuli. 
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The current study aims to investigate different inter-stimulus interval effect on habituation process by using non-painful tactile stimuli. 
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: The current study aims to investigate different inter-stimulus interval effect on habituation process by using non-painful tactile stimuli. 
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Non-painful tactile stimuli · habituation · inter-stimulus interval

Özet

Objective: The current study aims to investigate different inter-stimulus interval effect on habituation process by using non-painful tactile stimuli. 

🔖

Cite This Article

Akın, G., Güdücü, Ç. (2019). Inter-stimulus Interval Effect on Tactile Habituation: An Electrophysiological Approach. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2, 327–333. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.574931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Klingner CM, Hasler C, Brodoehl S, Witte OW. Excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms underlying somatosensory habituation: Somatosensory Habituation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 35: 152-60.
  2. Klingner CM, Nenadic I, Hasler C, Brodoehl S, Witte OW. Habituation within the somatosensory processing hierarchy. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 225: 432-6.
  3. Gallace A, Spence C. The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neurosci Biobehav R. 2010; 34: 246- 59.
  4. Angel RW, Quick WM, Curtis Boylls C, Weinrich M, Rodnitzky RL. Decrement of somatosensory evoked potentials during repetitive stimulation. Electroen Clin Neuro. 1985; 60: 335-42.
  5. Bingel U, Schoell E, Herken W, Büchel C. A. Habituation to painful stimulation involves the antinociceptive system: Pain. 2007; 131: 21-30.
  6. Nangini C, Ross B, Tam F, Graham SJ. Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex. NeuroImage. 2006; 33: 252-62.
  7. Robert Dowman. Interstimulus Interval Has No Effect on a Mid-Latency Scalp Potential Generated by Innocuous-Related Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex. Brain Topogr. 1997; 10: 145-54.
  8. Uglem M, Omland PM, Stjern M, Gravdahl GB, Sand T. Habituation of laser-evoked potentials by migraine phase: a blinded longitudinal study. J Headache Pain. 2017; 18: 100.
  9. Lehser C, Wagner E, Strauss DJ. Somatosensory Evoked Responses Elicited by Haptic Sensations in Midair. IEEE T Neur Sys Reh. 2018; 26: 2070-7.
  10. Forss N, Salmelin R, Hari R. Comparison of somatosensory evoked fields to airpuff and electric stimuli. Electroen Clin Neuro. 1994; 92: 510-7.
  11. Ploner M, Pollok B, Schnitzler A. Pain Facilitates Tactile Processing in Human Somatosensory Cortices. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92: 1825-9.
  12. Price DD. Psychological and Neural Mechanisms of the Affective Dimension of Pain. Science. 2000; 288(5472): 1769-72.
  13. McDiarmid TA, Bernardos AC, Rankin CH. Habituation is altered in neuropsychiatric disorders—A comprehensive review with recommendations for experimental design and analysis. Neurosci Biobehav R. 2017; 80: 286-305.
  14. Ozgoren M, Erdogan U, Bayazit O, Taslica S, Oniz A. Brain asymmetry measurement using EMISU (embedded interactive stimulation unit) in applied brain biophysics. Comput Biol Med. 2009; 39: 879-88.
  15. Jurcak V, Tsuzuki D, Dan I. 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. NeuroImage. 2007; 34: 1600-11.
  16. Kalita J, Bhoi SK, Misra UK. Is Lack of Habituation of Evoked Potential a Biological Marker of Migraine? Clin J Pain. 2014; 30: 724-9.
  17. Wikstrom H, Huttunen J, Korvenoja A. Effects of interstimulus interval on sensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor. Electroen Clin Neuro. 1996; 100: 479-87.
  18. Benedetti F. Sensory and Motor Functions of the Hand. In: Watt WC, editor. Writing Systems and Cognition: Perspectives from Psychology, Physiology, Linguistics, and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1994: 347–73.
  19. Hayward V. A Brief Overview of the Human Somatosensory System. In: Papetti S, Saitis C, editors. Musical Haptics. Springer International Publishing; 2018: 29–48.
  20. Raji TT, Vartiainen NV, Jousmäki V, Hari R. Effects of Interstimulus Interval on Cortical Responses to Painful Laser Stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 1: 73-9.
  21. Tomberg C, Desmedt JE, Ozaki I, Nguyen TH, Chalklin V. Mapping somatosensory evoked potentials to finger stimulation at intervals of 450 to 4000 msec and the issue of habituation when assessing early cognitive components. Electroen Clin Neuro. 1989; 74: 347-58.