Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 53 Sayı: 3

Comparison of Dermatological Diseases in Prison and General Dermatology Outpatient Clinics: A Retrospective Study

Cezaevi ve Genel Dermatoloji Polikliniklerinde Dermatolojik Hastalıkların Karşılaştırılması: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Candan Çelik(MALATYA TURGUT OZAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)
Mehmet Semih Çelik(Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital)
Pages
647–653
Publication Date
2026-09-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that environmental conditions and psychosocial factors may influence the distribution of dermatological diseases and highlight the importance of targeted dermatological care in prison settings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Objective: Dermatological diseases may vary depending on environmental conditions, hygiene, psychosocial stress, and access to healthcare.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective observational study included 442 patients, of whom 200 were admitted to a prison dermatology outpatient clinic and 242 to a general dermatology outpatient clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that environmental conditions and psychosocial factors may influence the distribution of dermatological diseases and highlight the importance of targeted dermatological care in prison settings.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cezaevi sağlığı · dermatolojik hastalıklar · viral siğiller

Abstract

Background and Objective: Dermatological diseases may vary depending on environmental conditions, hygiene, psychosocial stress, and access to healthcare. Data comparing the distribution of dermatological diseases between prison populations and the general population are limited. This study aimed to compare the frequency of dermatological diseases observed in patients admitted to prison dermatology outpatient clinics and general dermatology outpatient clinics. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 442 patients, of whom 200 were admitted to a prison dermatology outpatient clinic and 242 to a general dermatology outpatient clinic. Demographic characteristics and dermatological diagnoses Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using Jamovi software. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables with the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Viral warts, scabies, alopecia areata, telogen effluvium, and seborrheic Dermatitis was observed significantly more often in patients admitted to the prison dermatology outpatient clinic. In contrast, dermatitis (eczema group, including atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, nummular dermatitis,],) was significantly more common in the general dermatology outpatient clinic. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to acne, dermatophytosis, or psoriasis. Conclusion: Several infectious and stress-related dermatological diseases were more prevalent among prisoners, whereas dermatitis was more frequent in the general population. These results indicate that environmental conditions and psychosocial factors may influence the distribution of dermatological diseases and highlight the importance of targeted dermatological care in prison settings.

Özet

Amaç ve Giriş: Dermatolojik hastalıklar; çevresel koşullar, hijyen, psikososyal stres ve sağlık hizmetlerine erişim gibi faktörlere bağlı olarak değişkenlik gösterebilir. Cezaevi nüfusu ile genel nüfus arasında dermatolojik hastalıkların dağılımını karşılaştıran veriler sınırlıdır. Bu çalışma, cezaevi dermatoloji polikliniğine ve genel dermatoloji polikliniğine başvuran hastalarda gözlenen dermatolojik hastalıkların sıklığını karşılaştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif gözlemsel çalışmaya, 200’ü cezaevi dermatoloji polikliniğine ve 242’si genel dermatoloji polikliniğine başvuran toplam 442 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Demografik özellikler ve dermatolojik tanılara ait veriler tıbbi kayıtlardan elde edilmiş ve Jamovi yazılımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sürekli değişkenler Mann–Whitney U testi ile, kategorik değişkenler ise ki-kare veya Fisher’in kesin testi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Viral siğiller, uyuz, alopesi areata, telogen effluvium ve seboreik dermatit, cezaevi dermatoloji polikliniğine başvuran hastalarda anlamlı derecede daha sık gözlenmiştir. Buna karşılık, dermatit (egzama grubu,atopik dermatit,kontakt dermatit ve numuler dermatiti içeren egzema grubu) genel dermatoloji polikliniğinde anlamlı olarak daha yaygındır. Akne, dermatofitoz veya psoriazis açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı fark saptanmamıştır. Sonuç: Enfeksiyöz ve stresle ilişkili bazı dermatolojik hastalıklar mahkumlar arasında daha yaygınken, dermatit genel popülasyonda daha sık görülmüştür. Bu bulgular, çevresel koşulların ve psikososyal faktörlerin dermatolojik hastalıkların dağılımını etkileyebileceğini göstermekte ve cezaevi ortamlarında hedefe yönelik dermatolojik bakımın önemini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, C., Çelik, M. S. (2026). Comparison of Dermatological Diseases in Prison and General Dermatology Outpatient Clinics: A Retrospective Study. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 53 Sayı: 3, 647–653. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.2036942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, et al. The globalburden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of theprevalence and impact of skin conditions. J InvestDermatol. Haziran 2014;134(6):1527-34.
  2. Karimkhani C, Dellavalle RP, Coffeng LE, et al.Global Skin Disease Morbidity and Mortality: AnUpdate From the Global Burden of Disease Study2013. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(5):406-12.
  3. Fazel S, Baillargeon J. The health of prisoners.Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;377(9769):956-65.
  4. Ferris M, Islam RK, Huynh TN, et al. Aninternational review of skin conditions inincarcerated persons. JAAD Rev. 2024;2:113-26.
  5. Delie AM, Bogale EK, Anagaw TF, et al. Globalprevalence and predictors of scabies amongprisoners: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2024;24:1894.
  6. Bick JA. Infection control in jails and prisons. ClinInfect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am.2007;45(8):1047-55.
  7. Ferris M, Islam RK, Huynh TN, et al. Aninternational review of skin conditions inincarcerated persons. JAAD Rev. 2024;2:113-26.
  8. Bogino EA, Woldegeorgis BZ, Wondewosen L, et al. Scabies prevalence and its associated factors amongprisoners in southern Ethiopia: An institution-basedanalytical cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis.2023;17(12):e0011826.
  9. Tounkara TM, Soumah MM, Keita M, et al.Dermatological pathology in an African prisonenvironment: Guinean experience. Dermatol Asp.2017;5(1):1.
  10. Seth D, Cheldize K, Brown D, et al. Global Burdenof Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations. CurrDermatol Rep. 2017;6(3):204-10.
  11. Peters EMJ, Arck PC, Paus R. Hair growthinhibition by psychoemotional stress: a mousemodel for neural mechanisms in hair growthcontrol. Exp Dermatol. 2006;15(1):1-13.
  12. Thom E. Stress and the Hair Growth Cycle:Cortisol-Induced Hair Growth Disruption. J DrugsDermatol. 2016;1;15(8):1001-4.
  13. Rajabi F, Drake LA, Senna MM, et al. Alopeciaareata: a review of disease pathogenesis. Br JDermatol. 2018;179(5):1033-48.
  14. Misery L, Touboul S, Vinçot C, et al. [Stress andseborrheic dermatitis]. Ann Dermatol Venereol.2007;134(11):833-7.
  15. Vasam M, Korutla S, Bohara RA. Acne vulgaris: Areview of the pathophysiology, treatment, andrecent nanotechnology based advances. BiochemBiophys Rep. 2023; 23;36:101578.
  16. Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M.Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide.Mycoses. 2008;51 Suppl 4:2-15.
  17. Gonçalves MBS, Fonseca M, Mascarenhas-Melo F, et al. Advancing insights into psoriasis: frompathogenesis to current and emerging therapies. IntImmunopharmacol. 2025;165:115429.
  18. Thom E. Stress and the Hair Growth Cycle:Cortisol-Induced Hair Growth Disruption. J DrugsDermatol. 2016;1;15(8):1001-4.