Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Chinese School of International Relations: Myth or Reality?

Pages
95–104
Publication Date
2017-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

Review article of:

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, E. (2017). Chinese School of International Relations: Myth or Reality?. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 95–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/119784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647-59.
  2. Chang, Teng-chi. “Debating the Chinese School of IR: A Reflective Review from Taiwan.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang, and Teng-chi Chang, 81-97. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  3. Cox, Robert W. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10, no. 2 (1981): 126-55.
  4. Karaomanoğlu, Ali, and Ersel Aydınlı. “Introduction to All Azimuth.” All Azimuth 1, no. 1 (2012): 5-7.
  5. Köstem, Seçkin. “International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book.” All Azimuth 4, no. 1 (2015): 59-66.
  6. Kristensen, Peter Marcus. “Navigating the Core-Periphery Structures of “Global IR”: Dialogues and Audiences for the Chinese School as Travelling Theory.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 143-61. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  7. Ling, L. H. M. “What’s in a Name? A Critical Interrogation of the “Chinese School of IR”.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 17-34. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  8. Noesselt, Nele. “Mapping the World from a Chinese Perspective? The Debate on Constructing an IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 98-112. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  9. Qin, Yaqing. “Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress Through Debates.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11, no. 2 (2011): 231-57.
  10. Qin, Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 33-47.
  11. Qin, Yaqing. “Why is There No Chinese International Relations Theory?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 313-40.
  12. Sune, Engin. “Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun.” All Azimuth 5, no. 1 (2016): 79-88.
  13. Wallerstein, Immanuel. European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press, 2006.
  14. Wang, Jiangli, and Barry Buzan. “The English and Chinese Schools of Interna