SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2

Validation Study of the Teacher and Student Assessment for Learning Questionnaires in Physical Education Context

Öğretmen ve Öğrenci Öğrenme için Değerlendirme Anketlerinin Beden Eğitimi Bağlamında Geçerlik Çalışması

Süleyman Urcu(Tripolis Spor Kulübü)0009-0000-9865-6486
Gökçe Erturan(Pamukkale University, Faculty of Sport Sciences)0000-0002-1461-2679
Pages
193–211
Publication Date
2026-06-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that valid and reliable short forms of both questionnaires can be used to determine assessment for learning practices in physical education classes based on teacher and student perceptions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of Teacher and Student Assessment for Learning Questionnaires specifically adapted to the context of physical education classes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study consisted of physical education teachers (n=136) and students attending (n=3390) public middle and high schools in five central districts across Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that valid and reliable short forms of both questionnaires can be used to determine assessment for learning practices in physical education classes based on teacher and student perceptions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğrenme için değerlendirme · Beden eğitimi · Öğretmenlerin algıları

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of Teacher and Student Assessment for Learning Questionnaires specifically adapted to the context of physical education classes. The participants of the study consisted of physical education teachers (n=136) and students attending (n=3390) public middle and high schools in five central districts across Turkey. The Turkish adaptations of the original Teacher and Student Assessment for Learning Questionnaires, designed for use across all subjects, were administered focusing solely on physical education lessons in this study. To determine the construct validity of the questionnaires, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses were conducted. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. The results confirmed that both the teacher and student questionnaires retained their two-factor structure (monitoring and scaffolding), in line with the original questionnaires, when applied to the physical education context. Factor loadings were found to be adequate, and model fit indices met acceptable thresholds. The findings indicated that valid and reliable short forms of both questionnaires can be used to determine assessment for learning practices in physical education classes based on teacher and student perceptions.

Özet

Bu çalışma, beden eğitimi dersleri bağlamına özel olarak uyarlanmış Öğretmen ve Öğrenci Öğrenme için Değerlendirme Anketlerinin psikometrik özelliklerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya, Türkiye'nin beş merkezi ilindeki devlet ortaokul ve liselerinde görev yapan beden eğitimi öğretmenleri (n=136) ve bu okullara devam eden öğrenciler (n=3390) katılmıştır. Tüm derslerde kullanılmak üzere tasarlanan orijinal Öğretmen ve Öğrenci Öğrenme için Değerlendirme Anketlerinin Türkçe uyarlamaları, bu çalışmada yalnızca beden eğitimi derslerine odaklanılarak uygulanmıştır. Anketlerin yapı geçerliliğini belirlemek için Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizleri yapılmıştır. İç tutarlılık Cronbach's alfa katsayıları kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar hem öğretmen hem de öğrenci anketlerinin, beden eğitimi bağlamında uygulandığında, orijinal anketlerle uyumlu olarak iki faktörlü yapılarını (izleme ve yönlendirici destek) korudukları doğrulanmıştır. Faktör yüklemelerinin yeterli olduğu ve model uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir eşikleri karşıladığı bulunmuştur. Bulgular, her iki anketin de geçerli ve güvenilir kısa formlarının, beden eğitimi derslerinde öğrenme için değerlendirme uygulamalarının, öğrenci ve öğretmen algılarına göre belirlenmesinde kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Urcu, S., Erturan, G. (2026). Validation Study of the Teacher and Student Assessment for Learning Questionnaires in Physical Education Context. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2, 193–211. https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.1890073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Akib, E., and Ghafar, M. N. A. (2015). Assessment for learning instrumentation in higher education. International Education Studies, 8(4), 166-172.
  2. Azzaloualidine, Y., and Erturan, G. (2025). The effects of peer and self-assessment on students’ self-regulation, perceived motivational climate and volleyball skill in physical education. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 16(2), 306-332.
  3. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  4. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
  5. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3-12.
  6. Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
  7. Butler, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı [Data Analysis Handbook]. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  9. Çınargür, H. E. (2021). Beden eğitimi ve spor derslerinde öğrenme için ölçme uygulamalarının öğrencilerin motivasyon ve öz-düzenleme düzeyleri üzerine etkisi [The effect of assessment practices in physical education and sports classes on students' motivation and self-regulation levels]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pamukkale University.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbau
  11. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., and Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
  12. Costello, A. B., and Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
  13. Ellingson, J. E., Smith, D. B., and Sackett, P. R. (2001). Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 122.
  14. Erten, İ. H. (2015). Öğretmenliği kariyer olarak seçmede özgeci güdülenmeye dair toplumsal cazibe yanliliği sorunu [The problem of social bias regarding altruistic motivation in choosing teaching as a career]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 77-89.
  15. Ertmer, P. A., and Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24(1), 1–24.
  16. Erturan, G., Pat-El, R. J., Mengi, E, Cinargur, H. E., Arik, A., Daldas, A. O., and Azzaloualidine, Y. (2025). Adaptation of assessment for learning questionnaires for teachers and students into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. EdArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/5c42t_v1
  17. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., and Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
  18. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  19. Gan, Z., He, J., and Mu, K. (2019). Development and validation of the assessment for learning experience inventory (AFLEI) in Chinese higher education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(5), 371-385.
  20. George, D., and Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
  21. Griffin, L. L., and Butler, J. (2005). Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics.
  22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  23. Hay, P., and Penney, D. (2013). Assessment in physical education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
  24. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
  25. Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  26. James, M., and Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. The Curriculum Journal, 17(2), 109-138.
  27. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
  28. Karasar, N. (2023). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques]. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  29. Kastorff, T., Sailer, M., Vejvoda, J., Schultz-Pernice, F., Hartmann, V., Hertl, A.,. and Stegmann, K. (2023). Context-specificity to reduce bias in self-assessments: Comparing teachers’ scenario-based self-assessment and objective assessment of technological knowledge. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(6), 917-930.
  30. López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., and Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
  31. Lysaght, Z., and O’Leary, M. (2013). An instrument to audit teachers’ use of assessment for learning. Irish Educational Studies, 32(2), 217-232.
  32. MacLellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 307-318.
  33. Magill, R., and Anderson, D. I. (2010). Motor learning and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
  34. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2023, April 20). Milli eğitim istatistikleri örgün eğitim 2022/2023 [National education statistics formal education 2022/2023]. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=508.
  35. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2025). Ortaokul Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersi Öğretim Programı (5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [Curriculum of Physical Education and Sports Course (5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Grades)].
  36. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In B.B., Wolman (Eds), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders, Springer, Boston, MA. 97-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
  37. Pat-El, R. J., Tillema, H., Segers, M., and Vedder, P. (2013). Validation of assessment for learning questionnaires for teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 98-113.
  38. Rink, J. E. (2013). Teaching physical education for learning (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  39. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
  40. Siedentop, D., and Tannehill, D. (2000). Developing teaching skills in physical education. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
  41. Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  42. Tolgfors, B., and Öhman, M. (2016). The implications of assessment for learning in physical education and health. European Physical Education Review, 22(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15595006
  43. Türel, Y. K., Şimşek, A., Şengül Vautier, C. G., Şimşek, E., and Kızıltepe, F. (2023). 21. yüzyıl becerileri ve değerlere yönelik araştırma raporu [Research report on 21st-century skills and values]. https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2023_05/11153521_21.yy_becerileri_ve_degerlere_yonelik_arastirma_raporu.pdf
  44. Wiliam, D., and Thompson, M. (2017). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In The future of assessment (pp. 53-82). Routledge.
  45. Kastorff, T., Sailer, M., Vejvoda, J., Schultz-Pernice, F., Hartmann, V., Hertl, A.,. and Stegmann, K. (2023). Context-specificity to reduce bias in self-assessments: Comparing teachers’ scenario-based self-assessment and objective assessment of technological knowledge. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(6), 917-930.