Journals / Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

New Perspectives On Fertilization Programs. Why We Should Make A Difference With New Paradigms?

Gübreleme Programlarına Yeni Bir Bakış: Yeni paradigmalarla, Neden Fark Yaratmak Zorundayız?

Pages
13–20
Publication Date
2016-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The first one is the management of stress conditions and factors, the other one is the new approaches to increase the activity of food elements in the management of fertilizer usage and the last one is the consideration of new preparates and new sources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Agricultural production is regarded as the first scientific and technologic revolution, which is well accepted in the science world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Throughout the last century, it has been recognized the Intensive production paradigm till the early of 1980s depending on the developments in the science and technology world.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The first one is the management of stress conditions and factors, the other one is the new approaches to increase the activity of food elements in the management of fertilizer usage and the last one is the consideration of new preparates and new sources.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tarımsal Üretim Paradigmaları · Sürdürülebilirlik · Entegre Bitki Besin Maddesi Yönetimi

Abstract

Agricultural production is regarded as the first scientific and technologic revolution, which is well accepted in the science world. Throughout the last century, it has been recognized the Intensive production paradigm till the early of 1980s depending on the developments in the science and technology world. It is seen that the present production systems dominate the Sustainable production paradigm. Yet, it would seem that it is foreseen to transfer to the Food system paradigm in the near future.The study aims that new perspective puts forward the three important points in the agricultural production. The first one is the management of stress conditions and factors, the other one is the new approaches to increase the activity of food elements in the management of fertilizer usage and the last one is the consideration of new preparates and new sources.

Özet

Tarımsal üretim, bilim dünyasında kabul gören ilk bilimsel ve teknolojik devrim olarak kabul edilir. Son yüzyıldır, bilim ve teknolojideki gelişmelere bağlı olarak 1980’lerin başına kadar geçen dönemde Yoğun Üretim Paradigmasının geçerli olduğu kabul edilir. Bugünkü üretim sistemlerine ise; Sürdürülebilir Üretim Paradigmasının hakim olduğu görülür. Ancak görünen o ki, yakın gelecekte Gıda Sistemleri Paradigmasına geçileceği öngörülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOKUYSAL, B. (2016). New Perspectives On Fertilization Programs. Why We Should Make A Difference With New Paradigms?. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 13–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/119662

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alva, A.K., Paramasivam, S., Obreza, T.A., Schumann, A.W. Nitrogen Best Management Practice for Citrus Trees. Fruit Yield, Quality and Leaf Nutritional Status. Scientia Horticulturae. Vol.107. 2006
  2. Barker, A. V., Pilbeam, D. J. Handbook of Plant Nutrition. Taylor and Francis Group., 2007.
  3. Blum, A. Effective use of water (EUW) and not ro Water-use Efficiency is the Target of Crop Yield Improvement Under Drought Stress. Field Crop Research. Vol.112. 2000.
  4. Bray E.A., Bailey-Serres, J., E. Weretilnyk. Responses to Abiotic Stresses. In: Buchanan B., Gruissem W., Jones R., editors. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists; Rockville, MD, USA. 2000.
  5. Bruulsema, T. Know Your Fertilizer Rights. Soils&Crops. March-April 2009.
  6. Byerlee, D., Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E. Agriculture for Development: Toward a New Paradigm. Annual Review of Reseource Economics. Vol.1:15-3.
  7. Cassman, K. G., Doberman, A., Walters, D.T. Agroecosystems, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Management. Ambio. 31. 2002 Cheng L. When and How much Nitrogen Should be Applied in Apple Orchards? New York fruit Quarterly. Vol. 18(4). 2010.
  8. Christensen, B., Petersen, J., Schact, M. Long-term Field experiments- A Unique Research Platform. Proceeding of NJF Seminar 407. Danimarka, 2008.
  9. Conan, A. R. Bilim Tarihi, Dünya Kültürlerinde Bilimin Tarihi ve Gelişmesi. TÜBİTAK Yayınları, Ankara, 2005.
  10. Çokuysal, B. Toprak Bitki ve Su Analizlerine Dayalı Gübreleme Programlarının Hazırlanması. Fen Bilimleri Ens. Yl. Ders Notları, İzmir, 2016.
  11. Çokuysal, B. Bitkilerde Stres Tepkileri ve Gübreleme. Valagro Eğitim Seminerleri, Isparta. 2016.
  12. Das, D., Dwivedi, B. S., Meena, M. C. Interated Nutrient Management for Improving Soil Health and Crop Productivity. Indian J. Fert., Vol.11(4). 2015.
  13. Debreczeni, K., Körshens, M. Long Term field experiment of The World. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2010 FAO. Integrated plant nutrition system. FAO Fertiliser and Plant Nutrition Bulletin No. 12. Rome. 426 pp. 1995 FAO. Save and Grow. A Policymaker’s Guide to the Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder Crop Production. 2011 ISBN 978-92-5-106871-7. FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture. Paying Farmers for Environment Services. Rome: FAO, 2007. FAO. International Years of Soil. Soils store and filter water - Improving food security and our resilience to floods and droughts http://www.fao.org/soils-2015/en/. 2015.
  14. Gruhn, P., F. Goletti, M. Yudelman. Integrated nutrient management,