Journals / Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Categorization of Biostimulants: Current Situation in Turkey

Biyostimulantların Sınıflandırılması ve Türkiye’deki Durumu

Pages
185–200
Publication Date
2016-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review examines the biostimulants under the mentioned categories and their effects on plants’ physiology, nutrient uptake and stress tolerance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biostimulants are the substances that are applied to plants as root, foliar and seed applications, which are enhancing plants’ growth, nutritional status, stress resistance, quality and yield.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Biostimulants are permitted to use in agriculture in Turkey since 2002, also their global market is estimated 2.91 USD by 2021, at a compound annual growth rate of 10.4% from 2016 to 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review examines the biostimulants under the mentioned categories and their effects on plants’ physiology, nutrient uptake and stress tolerance.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Amino Asit · Bitki Aktivatörü · Biyostimülant

Abstract

Biostimulants are the substances that are applied to plants as root, foliar and seed applications, which are enhancing plants’ growth, nutritional status, stress resistance, quality and yield. Biostimulants may contain organic, inorganic compounds and microorganisms together or as individual. Some of the ingredients of biostimulants maintain soil structure. Biostimulants are permitted to use in agriculture in Turkey since 2002, also their global market is estimated 2.91 USD by 2021, at a compound annual growth rate of 10.4% from 2016 to 2021. Most of the industries of mentioned products are located in USA and Europe. In general; biostimulants do not directly affect pests, so they are not classified as pesticides. In Turkey; these products are added to Official Newspaper’s (17th of February 1999, Issue No: 23614) “Pesticide Like Materials” definition, following the signification of “insect traps” as “plant activators” in 2002. Biostimulants are not classified as fertilizers regardless of they comprise nutrients or not. Their classification is still uncertain although some researchers specified the important categories. These categories are; humic and fulvic acids, amino acids and other N containing compounds, seaweed and plant extracts, chitin and chitosan biopolymers, inorganic compounds, beneficial fungi and beneficial bacteria. This review examines the biostimulants under the mentioned categories and their effects on plants’ physiology, nutrient uptake and stress tolerance.

Özet

Biyostimülantlar, bitki gelişimini, bitkilerin beslenmesini, ürün kalitesini ve verimini olumlu yönde etkilemek; bitkilerin strese dayanıklılığını arttırmak amacıyla; bitkilere yapraktan, topraktan veya tohuma uygulanan, içeriğinde organik veya inorganik bileşikler, mikroorganizmalar bulundurabilen, ayrıca bazılarının toprak yapısını düzenleyici etkileri de bulunan materyallerdir. Sözü edilen materyaller Türkiye’de 2002 yılından itibaren izinli olarak tüketilmekte olup, dünya çapında pazarının 2016-2021 yılları arasında, yıllık % 10.4 artış ile 2.91 milyar Amerikan Doları olması beklenmektedir. Anılan ürünlerin endüstrileri özellikle Amerika ve Avrupa kıtalarında bulunmaktadır. Biyostimülantlar; genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde zararlılar üzerine doğrudan etkili olmadıkları için pestisit sınıfına dâhil edilmemektedirler. Ülkemizde ise, 17/2/1999 tarihli ve 23614 sayılı Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanan Zirai Mücadelede Kullanılan Pestisit ve Benzeri Maddelerin Ruhsatlandırılması Hakkında Yönetmeliğin 4 üncü maddesinde yer alan “Pestisit Benzeri Maddeler” tanımına “tuzaklar” ifadesinden sonra gelmek üzere “bitki aktivatörleri” ifadesi eklenmiştir. Ancak bununla birlikte sözü edilen ürünler; içeriklerinde bitki besin elementi bulunmasına bakılmaksızın gübre sınıfına da dâhil edilmemektedirler. Biyostimülantların sınıflandırmaları tamamen kesinleşmemekle birlikte, bazı araştırıcılar tarafından önemli kategorileri belirlemiştir. Bu kategoriler; humik ve fulvik asitler, amino asitler ve diğer azotlu bileşikler, deniz yosunu ve bitki ekstraktları, kitin ve kitosan benzeri polimerler, inorganik bileşikler, yararlı mantarlar ve yararlı bakteriler şeklindedir. Bu çalışmada biyostimülantlar, belirtilen kategoriler altında incelenmiş olup, biyostimülant uygulamalarının bitki fizyolojisine, bitkilerin besin elementi alımlarına ve stres toleransına etkileri derlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜLAHTAŞ, B., ÇOKUYSAL, B. (2016). Categorization of Biostimulants: Current Situation in Turkey. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 185–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/119677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abd El-Fattah, D. A., Ewedab, W. E., Zayed, M. S., Hassaneina, M. K. Effect of carrier materials, sterilization method, and storage temperature on survival and biological activities of Azotobacter chroococcum inoculants. Ann Agric Sci 2013, 58:111–118.
  2. Adani, F., Genevini, P., Zaccheo, P., Zocchi, G. (1998) The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. J Plant Nutr 21:561–575.
  3. Ahmad, R., Lim, C., J., Kwon, S., Y. (2013) Glycine betaine: a versatile compound with great potential for gene pyramiding to improve crop plant performance against environmental stresses. Plant Biotechnol Rep 7:49–57. doi:10.1007/s11816-012-0266-8.
  4. Alam, M., Z., Braun, G., Norrie, J., Hodges, D., M. (2013) Effect of Ascophyllum extract application on plant growth, fruit yield and soil microbial communities of strawberry. Can J Plant Sci 93:23–36.
  5. Albuzio, A., Nardi, S., Gulli, A. (1989) Plant growth regulator activity of small molecular size humic fractions. Sci Total Environ 81(82):671–674.
  6. Anjum, S., A., Farooq, M., Wang, L., C. (2011a) Gas exchange and chlorophyll synthesis of maize cultivars are enhanced by exogenously-applied glycinebetaine under drought conditions. Plant Soil Environ 57:326–331.
  7. Anjum, S., A., Wang, L., Farooq, M., Xue, L., Ali, S. (2011b) Fulvic acid application improves the maize performance under wellwatered and drought conditions. J Agron Crop Sci 197: 409–417. Anonymous, (2016) http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/biostimulant.asp
  8. Anonymous, EBIC (2013). Economic overview of the biostimulants sector in Europe. www.biostimulants.eu/2013/04/2013-overview-of-the-european-biostimulants-market/ Ashraf, M., Foolad, M., R. (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216.
  9. Asp, H., Berggren, D., (1990) Phosphate and calcium uptake in beech (Fagus sylvatica) in the presence of aluminium and natural fulvic acids. Physiol Plant 80:307–314.
  10. Aydin, A., Kant, C., Turan, M. (2012) Humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane leakage. Afr J Agric Res 7:1073–1086.
  11. Aziz, G., Bajsa, N., Haghjou, T., Taule, C., Valverde, A., Mariano, J., Arias, A. (2012) Abundance, diversity and prospecting of culturable phosphate solubilizing bacteria on soils under crop–pasture rotations in a no-tillage regime in Uruguay. Appl Soil Ecol 2012, 61:320–326.
  12. Baharlouei, K., Pazira, E., Solhi, M. (2011) Evaluation of Ino