Journals / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Özel Sayı

The analysis of the effect of intellectual capital on the values of the firms in ISE tourism sector

İMKB turizm sektöründe entellektüel sermayenin firma değeri üzerindeki etkisinin analizi

Pages
98–108
Publication Date
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that intellectual capital components have the effects on firm value.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of intellectual capital components (human capital efficiency coefficient, structural capital efficiency coefficient, used capital efficiency coefficient) on the values of the firms in the tourism sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the analysis consists of tourism companies traded at ISE between 2004 and 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that intellectual capital components have the effects on firm value.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:entellektüel sermaye · firma değeri · turizm sektörü

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of intellectual capital components (human capital efficiency coefficient, structural capital efficiency coefficient, used capital efficiency coefficient) on the values of the firms in the tourism sector. The population of the analysis consists of tourism companies traded at ISE between 2004 and 2007. Regression models including some control variables have been conducted. Moreover, in order to determine the similarities and differences among the variables, multidimesional scaling model has been used. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that intellectual capital components have the effects on firm value.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, entellektüel sermaye bileşenlerinin (insan etkinliği katsayısı, kullanılan sermaye etkinliği katsayısı ve yapısal sermaye etkinliği katsayısı) turizm sektöründe yer alan firmaların firma değerleri üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Analiz kapsamına 2004-2007 yılları arasında İMKB turizm sektöründe işlem görmekte olan firmalar alınmış olup, bağımlı ve bağımsız değişkenlerle birlikte kontrol değişkenleri de kullanılarak regresyon modelleri oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmada değişkenler arasındaki benzerlik ve farklılıkların tespiti amacıyla çok boyutlu ölçekleme modelinden de yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda entellektüel sermaye bileşenlerinin firma değeri üzerinde etkisi olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karacaer, S., Kapusuzoğlu, A. (2010). The analysis of the effect of intellectual capital on the values of the firms in ISE tourism sector. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Özel Sayı, 98–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/1189200

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Ambler, T., Bhattacharya, C. B., Edell, J., Keller, K. L., Lemon, K. N. ve Mittal, V. (2002). Relating Brand and Customer Perspectives on Marketing Management, Journal of Service Research, 5: 13-25
  2. Arslan, Ö. (2004). Entelektüel Sermayenin Türkiye’deki Raporlanma Şeklinin İncelenmesi, Journal of Faculty of Business, 5 (2): 78-87
  3. Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C. ve Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual Capital and Business Performance in Malasian Industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1): 85-100
  4. Bowen, D. E. ve Schneider, B. (1988). Services Marketing and Management: Implications for Organizational Behavior, in Research in Organizational Behavior. 10, B. M. Staw ve T. G
  5. Cmmings, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 43-80
  6. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. Londra: Thomson Publishing Inc
  7. Cleary, P. (2009). Exploring the Relationship between Management Accounting and Structural Capital in a Knowledge-Intensive Sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10 (1): 37-52
  8. Drucker P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business
  9. Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction, Management Accounting, 78: 32-36
  10. El-Bannany, M. (2008). A Study of Determinants of Intellectual Capital Performance in Banks: The UK Case, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9 (3): 487-498
  11. Gutek, B. A. (1995). The Dynamics of Service. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass
  12. Hogan, J. E., Lemon, K. N. ve Rust, R. T. (2002). Customer Equity Management: Charting New Directions for the Future of Marketing, Journal of Service Research, 5: 4-12
  13. Karacaer, S. ve Aygün, M. (2009). Entelektüel Sermayenin Firma Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 27 (2): 127-140
  14. Liu, D. Y., Tseng, K. A. ve Yen, S. W. (2009). The Incremental Impact of Intellectual Capital on Value Creation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10 (2): 260-276
  15. Luo, X. R., Koput, K. W. ve Powell, W. W. (2009). Intellectual Capital or Signal? The Effects of Scientists on Alliance Formation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries, Research Policy, 38: 1313-1325
  16. Marques, D. P. ve Simon F. J. G. (2003). Validating and Measuring IC in the Biotechnology and Telecommunication Industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (3): 332-347
  17. Oliva, R. ve Sterman, J. D. (2001). Cutting Corners and Working Overtime: Quality Erosion in the Service Industry, Management Science, 47: 892-914
  18. Ortiz, M. A. A. (2009). Analysis and Valuation of Intellectual Capital According to Its Context, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10 (3): 451-482
  19. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. ve Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications, Journal of Marketing, 49: 41-50
  20. Pulic, A. (1998). The Physical and Intellectual Capital of Austrian Banks, http://www.measuring-ip/OPapers/Pulic/Bank/enbank
  21. html Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance of US Multinational Firms: A Study of the Resource- Based and Stakeholder Views, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (2): 215-226
  22. Roos, G. ve Roos, J. (1997). Measuring Your Company’s Intellectual Performance, Long Range Planning, 30 (3): 413-426
  23. Safieddine, A., Jamali, D. ve Noureddine, S. (2009). Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: Evidence from an Academic Institution, Corporate Governance, 9 (2): 146-157
  24. Smith, G. V. ve Parr, R. L. (2000). Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets. New York: John Wiley & Sons
  25. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Entelektüel Sermaye: Kuruluşların Yeni Zenginliği
  26. (Çev. Nurettin Elhüseyni), İstanbul: BZD Yayıncılık
  27. Tan, H. P., Plowman, D. ve Hancock, P. (2007). Intellectual Capital and Financial Returns of Companies, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8 (1): 76-95
  28. Walsh, K., Enz, C. A. ve Canina, L. (2008). The Impact of Strategic Orientation on Intellectual Capital Investments in Customer Service Firms, Journal of Service Research, 10 (4): 300-317
  29. Wiklund, J. ve Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1307-1314.