SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

The Relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Inclusive Climate and Emotional Commitment

Çağlar Çelik0000-0003-2468-6097
Soner Polat(Kocaeli University)0000-0003-2407-6491
Emre Esen
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show a positive impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores how inclusive leadership shapes innovative work behavior, focusing on the intermediary effects of emotional commitment and an inclusive climate in Turkish public schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on data from 364 teachers in Kocaeli, the research utilized a range of scales to assess aspects like inclusive leadership, emotional commitment, inclusive climate, and innovative work behavior.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show a positive impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Inclusive Leadership · Innovative Work Behavior · Emotional Commitment

Abstract

This study explores how inclusive leadership shapes innovative work behavior, focusing on the intermediary effects of emotional commitment and an inclusive climate in Turkish public schools. Drawing on data from 364 teachers in Kocaeli, the research utilized a range of scales to assess aspects like inclusive leadership, emotional commitment, inclusive climate, and innovative work behavior. The analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results show a positive impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior. However, the impact is mediated through the presence of an inclusive climate and high levels of emotional commitment. The findings suggest that while inclusive leadership is necessary for fostering innovation, it is the combination of an emotionally supportive and inclusively diverse environment that truly enhances innovative behaviors among teachers. This comprehensive approach not only supports the innovative capacity of individuals but also contributes to a more dynamic and creative educational atmosphere. This study highlights the importance of adopting a holistic leadership strategy in educational institutions. It underscores the need for school administrators to not only practice inclusive leadership but also actively cultivate an environment that values diversity and fosters emotional commitment. By doing so, schools can become fertile grounds for innovation, benefiting educators and students alike. The research provides valuable insights into the mechanisms through which leadership can influence organizational behavior and offers a framework for fostering innovation in educational settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, Ç., Polat, S., Esen, E. (2024). The Relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Inclusive Climate and Emotional Commitment. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1420668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (134)

  1. Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Bin Saeed, B. (2019). Do nurses display innovative work behavior when their values match with hospitals’ values? European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2017-0007
  2. Afsar, B., & Umrani, W.A. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257
  3. Al-Atwi, A. A., & Al-Hassani, K. K. (2021). Inclusive leadership: Scale validation and potential consequences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(8), 1222-1240. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2020-0327
  4. Alay, H.K., & Can, E. (2019). Örgütlerde cinsel yönelim temeline dayalı kimlik: Farklılık iklimi algısı, bireysel ve örgütsel çıktıların incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 22(1), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.526361
  5. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  6. Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3%3C249::AID-JOB10%3E3.0.CO;2-%23
  7. Ashikali, T., Groeneveld, S., & Kuipers, B. (2020). The role of inclusive leadership in supporting an inclusive climate in diverse public sector teams. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(3), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19899722
  8. Aslan, H. (2019a). The mediating role of inclusive leadership in the effect of work engagement on innovative work behavior. OPUS–International Journal of Society Researches, 14(20), 1055-1069. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.625785
  9. Aslan, H. (2019b). Mediating role of perceived organizational support in inclusive leadership's effect on innovative work behavior. BMIJ, 7(5), 2945-2963. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i5.1299
  10. Bannay, D. F., Hadi, M. J., & Amanah, A. A. (2020). The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 479-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.39
  11. Baş, M. (2022). Kamu çalışanlarının kapsayıcı liderlik algısı üzerine bir araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 343-354. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gumus/issue/68497/1019637 Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
  12. Boekhorst, J. A. (2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21669 Bortini, P., Paci, A., Rise, A., & Rojnik, I. (2018). Inclusive leadership. School for Leaders Foundation. https://inclusiveleadership.eu/il_theoreticalframework_en.pdf
  13. Brimhall, K. C., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2018). The critical role of workplace inclusion in fostering innovation, job satisfaction, and quality of care in a diverse human service organization. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(5), 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2018.1526151
  14. Buskirk, M. V. (2020). Inclusive leadership, psychological empowerment, and affective organizational commitment: A mediated model [Unpublished master’s thesis]. San José State University. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8713&context=etd_theses
  15. Buttner, E. H., Lowe, K. B., & Billings-Harris, L. (2012). An empirical test of diversity climate dimensionality and relative effects on employee of color outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1179-0
  16. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, (32), 470-483. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10365/126871
  17. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
  18. Chin, J. L. (Ed.) (2009). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination: A revised and condensed edition. Praeger.
  19. Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Kang, S. W. (2017). Inclusive leadership and employee well-being: The mediating role of person-job fit. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1877–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9801-6
  20. Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Park, B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(6), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931
  21. Chrobot-Mason, D., & Aramovich, N. P. (2013). The psychological benefits of creating an affirming climate for workplace diversity. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113509835
  22. Chrobot-Mason, D., Ruderman, M. D., & Nishii, L. H. (2014). Leadership in a diverse workplace. In D. Day (Ed.), Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 683–708). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.001.0001
  23. Chughtai, A. A. (2013). Linking affective commitment to supervisor to work outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(6), 606-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2011-0050
  24. Creswell (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  25. Cunningham, J. B. (2023). Defining the climate for inclusiveness and multiculturalism: Linking to context. Administrative Sciences, 13(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040100
  26. Çetin, S. (2021). Örgütsel güvenin duygusal bağlılığa etkisi. Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.47542/sauied.938283
  27. Çimen, İ., & Yücel, C. (2017). Yenilikçi davranış ölçeği (YDÖ): Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 6(3), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.801853
  28. Dağlı, A., Elçiçek, Z, & Han, B. (2018). Örgütsel bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(68), 1788-1800. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.445932
  29. De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27. https://ondernemerschap.panteia.nl/pdf-ez/h200820.pdf
  30. De Jong, J. P. J., & Wennekers, S. (2008). Intrapreneurship: Conceptualizing entrepreneurial employee behaviour. EIM Business and Policy Research.
  31. De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D.N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720546
  32. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  33. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. Plenum Press.
  34. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  35. Dwertmann, D. J. G., & Boehm, S. A. (2016). Status matters: The asymmetric effects of supervisor–subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0093
  36. Dwertmann, D. J. G., Nishii, L. H., & van Knippenberg, D. (2016). Disentangling the fairness & discrimination and synergy perspectives on diversity climate: Moving the field forward. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1136–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316630380
  37. Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., & Barreto, M. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2013.841490
  38. Erdem, A. T. (2021). Güçlendirici liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü: Bilişim sektöründe bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.824655
  39. Erkal, P. (2023). Kapsayıcı liderliğin çalışan performansı üzerine etkisi: Yenilikçi iş davranışlarının aracı rolü. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 19(4), 822-843. http://dx.doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1336195
  40. Fang, Y., Chen, J.-Y., Wang, M.-J., & Chen, C.-Y (2019). The impact of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behaviors: The mediation of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1803), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01803
  41. Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 63–80). John Wiley & Sons.
  42. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  43. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  44. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
  45. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
  46. Giray, M. D., & Şahin, D. N. (2014). Liderlik stillerinin duygusal bağlılık ve işten ayrılma niyetiyle ilişkilerinde örgütsel destek algısının aracılık rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 29(73), 1-14. https://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/yayinlar/dergiler/1031828/tpd1300443320140000m000052.pdf
  47. Gonzalez, J.A., & DeNisi, A.S. (2009). Cross-level effects of demography and diversity climate on organizational attachment and firm effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.498
  48. Gotsis, G., & Grimani, K. (2016). Diversity as an aspect of effective leadership: Integrating and moving forward. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2014-0107
  49. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  50. Gül, E., & Çakıcı, A. B. (2021). Kapsayıcı liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması ve kapsayıcı liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güvenliğin aracılık rolü. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 24(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.895678
  51. Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
  52. Hair J. F., E., Ringle C., M., & Sarstedt M., (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  53. Hair, J. F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  54. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M., & Ringle, C.M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
  55. Hakimian, F., Farid, H., Ismail, M. N., & Nair, P. K. (2016). Importance of commitment in encouraging employees’ innovative behaviour. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2015-0054
  56. Henseler, J., Ringle, C., M., & Sarstedt, M., (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  57. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
  58. Hofhuis, J., van der Rijt, P. G. A., & Vlug, M. (2016). Diversity climate enhances work outcomes through trust and openness in workgroup communication. Springerplus, 5(714), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2499-4
  59. Hollander, E. P. (2012). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship, Routledge.
  60. Huang, J., Wang, Y., & You, X. (2016). The job demands-resources model and job burnout: The mediating role of personal resources. Current Psychology, 35(4), 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9321-2
  61. Işık, C., & Aydın, E. (2016). Bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisi: Ayder yaylası konaklama işletmeleri üzerine bir uygulama. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(2), 75-103. https://openaccess.artvin.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11494/4078/ekrem_aydin.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  62. Jafri, M. H. (2010). Organizational commitment and employee's innovative behaviour: A study in retail sector. Journal of Management Research, 10(1), 62-68.
  63. Jain, R. (2015). Employee innovative behavior: A conceptual framework. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(1), 1-16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43974534
  64. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  65. Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.238
  66. Jaros, S. (2007). Meyer and Allen model of organizational commitment: Measurement issues. The Icfai Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6(4), 7-25.
  67. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(4), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.50
  68. Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.3
  69. Kossek, E. E., & Zonia, S. C. (1993). Assessing diversity climate: A field study of reactions to employer efforts to promote diversity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140107
  70. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  71. Kurkan, G., & Polat, S. (2021). Adaptation of diversity climate scale to Turkish, in O. Titrek, G. Sezen-Gultekin, M. P. Kodric, C. S. Reis (Eds.), 7th international conference on lifelong education and leadership for all conference proceeding book (pp. 172-184). ICLEL Publication. https://www.iclel.com/_files/ugd/d546b1_745a6ba405354ab69327f6cea8d73ea8.pdf
  72. Lambert, J. (2016). Cultural diversity as a mechanism for innovation: Workplace diversity and the absorptive capacity framework. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 20(1), 68-77. https://hdl.handle.net/11274/12976
  73. Luu, T. T. (2019). Can diversity climate shape service innovative behavior in Vietnamese and Brazilian tour companies? The role of work passion. Tourism Management, 72, 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.011
  74. Ma Prieto, I., & Pilar Pérez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
  75. Mahmod, L. S., (2022). The effect of authentic leadership on innovative work behavior, psychological empowerment and work engagement: A research in banking sector, [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Okan University.
  76. Mavi, A. (2022). Kapsayıcı liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan örgütsel desteğin rolü. In İktisadi̇ ve İdari̇ Bilimlerde Akademik Analiz ve Tartışmalar (pp. 659-669). Özgür Yayın Dağıtım. https://www.imperialyayin.com/yeni-%C3%A7ikanlar/iktisadi-ve-idari-bilimlerde/iktisadi-ve-idari-bilimlerde-kitap
  77. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Theory, research and application. Sage Publications.
  78. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
  79. Moon, T. W., & Hur, W. M. (2011). Emotional intelligence, emotional exhaustion, and job performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 39(8), 1087-1096. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.8.1087
  80. Mor Barak, M. E. (2005). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Sage.
  81. Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A. and Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886398341006
  82. Mor Barak, M. E., Lizano, E. L., Kim, A., Duan, L., Rhee, M.-K., Hsiao, H.-Y., & Brimhall, K. C. (2016). The promise of diversity management for climate of inclusion: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(4), 305-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1138915
  83. Mor Barak, M. E., Luria, G., & Brimhall, K. C. (2022). What leaders say versus what they do: Inclusive leadership, policy-practice decoupling, and the anomaly of climate for inclusion. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 840-871. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211005916
  84. Morley, M. J., Heraty, N., & Michailova, S. (2016). Managing human resources in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge.
  85. Müceldili, B., Tatar, B., & Erdil, O. (2018). Kapsayıcı liderlik ve öznel ilişkisel deneyimin psikolojik uygunluğa etkisi: Bir model önerisi. In 6. örgütsel davranış kongresi bildiriler kitabı (pp. 602-610).
  86. Muchtar, Y. C., Absah, Y., Sadalia, I., & Siahaan, E. (2021). The role of innovative work behaviour as the mediator between inclusive leadership and subjective career success. In 3rd international conference on business and management of technology (ICONBMT 2021) (pp. 219-225). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211226.029
  87. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships, The Leadership Quarterly. 13(6), 705-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
  88. Najmaei, A., & Sadeghinejad Z. (2019). Inclusive leadership: A scientometric assessment of an emerging field. Diversity within Diversity Management: Types of Diversity in Organizations, 22, 221-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120190000022012
  89. Nelissen, P. T. J. H., Hülsheger, U. R., van Ruitenbeek, G. M. C., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2017). Lending a helping hand at work: A multilevel investigation of prosocial motivation, inclusive climate and inclusive behavior. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9680-z
  90. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
  91. Nguyen, P. V., Le, H. T. N., Trinh, T. V. A., & Do, H. T. S. (2019). The effects of inclusive leadership on job performance through mediators. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 63–94. https://ejournal.usm.my/aamj/article/view/82
  92. Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
  93. Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412-1426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017190
  94. Obaid, H. J., & Al-Abachee, A. S. F. (2020). The role of inclusive leadership in enhancing the strategic flexibility. International Journal of Psychological Rehabilitation, 24(7), 6766–6776. https://www.psychosocial.com/archives/volume-24/Issue%207/18086
  95. Okçu, V., & Deviren, İ. (2021). Kapsayıcı liderlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(20), 321-333. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejedus/issue/65989/1010868
  96. Özcan, G. (2020). Personel güçlendirme ve yenilikçi iş davranışı arasındaki ilişki: örgütsel yaratıcılığın aracılık etkisi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hatay Mustafa Kemal University.
  97. Panaccio, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009). Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.002
  98. Patterson, A., & Byrd, M. (2022). The conceptual development of the interdependent model of inclusivity. https://hrgradcapstone.oucreate.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Inclusive-Leadership-Model.pdf
  99. Perry-Smith J. E., & Shalley C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040691
  100. Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650
  101. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  102. Polat S., & Çelik Ç., (2023). Kapsayıcı liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi/Journal of Higher Education and Science, 13(2), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1085320 Pugh, S., Dietz, J., Brief, A., & Wiley, J. (2008). Looking inside and out: The impact of employee and community demographic composition on organizational diversity climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1422-1428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012696
  103. Pukienė, A. (2016). Innovative work behavior-the role of human resource management and affective commitment [Unpublished master’s thesis]. ISM University of Management and Economics. http://gs.elaba.lt/object/elaba:18899278/18899278.pdf
  104. Qi, L., Liu, B., Wei, X., & Hu, Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: Perceived organizational support as a mediator. PLoS ONE, 14(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212091
  105. Rademaker, M.E., Schuberth, F., & Dijkstra, T.K. (2019). Measurement error correlation within blocks of indicators in consistent partial least squares: Issues and remedies. Internet Research, 29(3), 448-463. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0525
  106. Rahmi, A. K., & Desiana, P. M. (2023). Linking inclusive leadership, workplace spirituality, and innovative work behaviour to job performance: An empirical study in public sector. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Management, 16(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v16i3.50976
  107. Randel, A. E., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B., & Shore, L. (2016). Leader inclusiveness, psychological diversity climate, and helping behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2013-0123
  108. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
  109. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
  110. Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010
  111. Schaijk, S. V. (2018). The Relationship between affective organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior and innovative behavior. In a research with extensive training and innovative organizational climate as moderators [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Radboud University. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/123456789/5792/Schaijk%2C_Sigrid_van_1.pdf?sequence=1
  112. Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T.K. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators. Quality and Quantity, 52(1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0401-7
  113. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.658656
  114. Sezgin, O. B., Uçar, Z., & Duygulu, E. (2015). Güven, yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.268156
  115. Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., & Ting, H. (2021). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & Quantity, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01102-0
  116. Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
  117. Shin, S. J., Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2017). When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 68-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2111
  118. Shore, L.M., Randel, A.E., Chung, B.G., Dean, M.A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262-1289. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206310385943
  119. Solinger, O., Van Olffen, W., & Roe, R. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.70
  120. Spreitzer, G. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256865
  121. Strom, D. L., Sears, K. L., & Kelly, K. M. (2014). Work engagement: The roles of organizational justice and leadership style in predicting engagement among employees. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1548051813485437
  122. Sürücü, L., & Maslakçı, A. (2021). Kapsayıcı liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 22(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.973009
  123. Şentürk, H. A. (2019). Kapsayıcı liderlik davranışı ve iş modeli ilişkisi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Adnan Menderes University.
  124. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
  125. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
  126. Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
  127. Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002
  128. Wang, Y. X., Yang, Y. J., Wang, Y., Su, D., Li, S. W., Zhang, T., & Li, H. P. (2019). The mediating role of inclusive leadership: Work engagement and innovative behaviour among Chinese head nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(4), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12754
  129. Xiang, H., Chen, Y., & Zhao, F. (2017). Inclusive leadership, psychological capital, and employee innovation performance: The moderating role of leader-member exchange. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, 13(811330). 111–115. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/hsmet2017/16465
  130. Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure, European Management Journal. 37(4), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006
  131. Yıldırım, E. (2021). Okullarda kapsayıcı liderlik ve danışmanlık: Sığınmacı öğrenciler. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 25, 130-155. https://www.enadonline.com/index.php/enad/article/download/1091/628
  132. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
  133. Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.01.002
  134. Zhong, J., Li, Y., & Luo, J. (2021). The trickle-down effects of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: The joint moderating effects of vicarious learning and organizational inclusion climate. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(3), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211059941