Journals / Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Rekombinant DNA Teknolojisinin Veteriner Aşılarda Kullanımı

Pages
162–166
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

İlk keşfedildiği yıllardan bu yana aşılar, infeksiyöz hastalıkların kontrolü için en etkili, nispeten ucuz maliyetli ve

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:İlk keşfedildiği yıllardan bu yana aşılar, infeksiyöz hastalıkların kontrolü için en etkili, nispeten ucuz maliyetli ve
📊
Key Findings & Data:İlk keşfedildiği yıllardan bu yana aşılar, infeksiyöz hastalıkların kontrolü için en etkili, nispeten ucuz maliyetli ve
💡
Conclusion & Impact:İlk keşfedildiği yıllardan bu yana aşılar, infeksiyöz hastalıkların kontrolü için en etkili, nispeten ucuz maliyetli ve
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aşı · DNA · Rekombinant

Özet

İlk keşfedildiği yıllardan bu yana aşılar, infeksiyöz hastalıkların kontrolü için en etkili, nispeten ucuz maliyetli ve

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZENER, M. G., ÇİFTCİ, A., FINDIK, A. (2018). Rekombinant DNA Teknolojisinin Veteriner Aşılarda Kullanımı. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 162–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/118532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Babu U, Dalloul RA, Okamura M, Lillehoj HS, Xie H, Raybourne RB, Gaines D, Heckert RA, (2004). Salmonella enteritidis clearance and immune responses in chickens following Salmonella vaccination and challenge. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 101, 251-257
  2. Balamurugan V, Sen A, Saravanan P, Singh RK, (2006). Biotechnology in the production of Recombinant Vaccine or Antigen for Animal Health. J Anim Vet Adv. 5(6), 487-495
  3. Barbour EK, Hamadeh SK, Eidt A, (2000). Infection and immunity in broiler chicken breeders vaccinated with a temperature-sensitive mutant of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and impact on performance of offspring. Poult Sci. 79, 1730-1735
  4. Chalmers WS, Simpson J, Lee SJ, Baxendale W, (1997). Use of a live chlamydial vaccine to prevent ovine enzootic abortion. Vet Rec. 141, 63-67
  5. Confer AW, Ayalew S, Panciera RJ, Montelongo M, Wray JH, (2006). Recombinant Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 outer membrane protein PlpE enhances commercial M. haemolytica vaccine-induced resistance against serotype 6 challenge. Vaccine. 24, 2248-2255
  6. Darteil R, Bublot M, Laplace E, Bouquet JF, Audonnet JC, Riviere M, (1995). Herpesvirus of turkey recombinant viruses expressing infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) VP2 immunogen induce protection against an IBDV virulent challenge in chickens. Virol. 211, 481-490
  7. Davis BS, Chang GJ, Cropp B, Roehrig JT, Martin DA, Mitchel CJI, Bowen R, Bunning ML, (2001). West Nile virus recombinant DNA vaccine protects mouse and horse from virus challenge and expresses in vitro a noninfectious recombinant antigen that can be used in enzymelinked immunosorbent assays. J Virol. 75, 4040-4047. 8. de Kinkelin P, Bearzotti M, Castric J, Nougayrede P, Lecocq- Xhonneux F, Thiry M, (1995). Eighteen years of vaccination against viral haemorrhagic septicaemia in France. Vet Res. 26, 379-387
  8. Dorneles EMS, Sriranganathan N, Lage AP, (2015). Recent advances in Brucella abortus vaccines. Vet Res. 46, 76
  9. Ellis RW, (1999). New technologies for making vaccines. Vaccine. 17, 1596-1604
  10. Jackwood MW, Hickle L, Kapil S, Silva R, (2008). Vaccine Development Using Recombinant DNA Technology. Animal Agriculture’s Future through Biotechnology(CAST) Part 7,413-40-02
  11. Jackwood MW, Saif YM, (1985). Efficacy of a commercial turkey coryza vaccine (Art-Vax) in turkey poults. Avian Dis. 29, 1130-1139
  12. Jacobs AA, Goovaerts D, Nuijten PJ, Theelen RP, Hartford OM, Foster TJ, (2000). Investigations towards an efficacious and safe str