SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 24 Issue: 1

THE ROLE OF WORKING CAPITAL AS A SOURCE AND CASH FLOW INSENSITIVITY OF FIXED INVESTMENT IN LOW CASH FLOW LEVELS

DÜŞÜK NAKİT AKIŞ SEVİYELERİNDE İŞLETME SERMAYESİNİN KAYNAK ROLÜ VE SABİT YATIRIMIN NAKİT AKIŞ DUYARSIZLIĞI

Cihan Çobanoğlu(AİBÜ İİBF İşletme Bölümü)0000-0001-5698-318X
Ümit Gümrah(AİBÜ İİBF İşletme Bölümü)0000-0003-4857-4751
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings support the predictions of the model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper proposes a model which demonstrates that the source role of working capital in lowering investment-cash flow sensitivity is more important for financially constrained firms with low cash flows.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to test these predictions, regression equations were estimated with panel data fixed effects model and instrumental variable approach using a data of 255 companies traded on Turkish markets in 2005–2017 period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings support the predictions of the model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005–2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fixed Investment · Financing Constraints · Cash Flow

Abstract

This paper proposes a model which demonstrates that the source role of working capital in lowering investment-cash flow sensitivity is more important for financially constrained firms with low cash flows. The model has two predictions for the samples where more financially constrained firms have lower cash flows. First, if working capital is not controlled, more financially constrained firms have lower investment-cash flow sensitivity. Second, if working capital is controlled, more financially constrained firms have higher investment-cash flow sensitivity. In order to test these predictions, regression equations were estimated with panel data fixed effects model and instrumental variable approach using a data of 255 companies traded on Turkish markets in 2005–2017 period. The findings support the predictions of the model.

Özet

Çalışma, işletme sermayesinin kaynak rolünün yatırım-nakit akış duyarlılığını düşürücü etkisinin, düşük nakit akışına sahip finansal kısıtlı firmalarda daha önemli olduğunu gösteren bir model önermektedir. Daha çok finansal kısıtlı firmaların daha düşük nakit akışına sahip olduğu örneklemlerde modelin iki öngörüsü bulunmaktadır. Birincisi, işletme sermayesi kontrol edilmediğinde, daha çok finansal kısıtlı firmaların yatırım-nakit akış duyarlılığının daha düşük olmasıdır. İkincisi, işletme sermayesi kontrol edildiğinde, daha çok finansal kısıtlı firmaların, yatırım-nakit akış duyarlılığının daha yüksek olmasıdır. Öngörülerin test edilmesi için regresyon denklemleri, panel veri sabit etkiler modeli ve araç değişken yaklaşımı ile Türkiye piyasalarında işlem gören 255 şirketin 2005–2017 arası döneme ait verisi kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Bulgular modelin öngörülerini desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çobanoğlu, C., Gümrah, Ü. (2023). THE ROLE OF WORKING CAPITAL AS A SOURCE AND CASH FLOW INSENSITIVITY OF FIXED INVESTMENT IN LOW CASH FLOW LEVELS. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 24 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1168094

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Abel, A. B., & Blanchard, O. J. (1986). The Present Value of profits and cyclical movements in ınvestment. The Econometric Society, 54(2), 249-273. doi:10.2307/1913150
  2. Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The cash flow sensitivity of cash. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777-1804. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00679.x
  3. Almeida, H., Campello, M. and Weisbach, M. S. (2021). The cash flow sensitivity of cash: Replication, extension, and robustness (Working Paper No. 2021-03-002). Fisher College of Business. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3773591
  4. Booth, L., & Cleary, S. (2006, Temmuz). Cash flow volatility, financial slack and investment decisions, 2006 China International Conference in Finance’de sunulan bildiri. Xi’an, China. http://cicfconf.org/past/cicf2006/enrc.php adresinden erişildi.
  5. Cleary, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 673-692. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00121
  6. Cleary, S., Povel, P., & Raith, M. (2007). The U-shaped investment curve: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(1), 1-39. doi:10.1017/S0022109000002179
  7. Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1), 141-206. doi:10.2307/2534426
  8. Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (1993). Working capital and fixed investment: new evidence on financing constraints. The RAND Journal of Economics, 24(3), 328-342. doi:10.2307/2555961
  9. Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1994). Monetary policy, business cycles, and the behavior of small manufacturing firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 309-340. doi:10.2307/2118465
  10. Gertler, M., & Rose, A. (1991). Finance, growth, and public policy (Working Paper No. 814). The World Bank Country Economics Department. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/ 269621468740425955 adresinden erişildi.
  11. Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, C. P. (1995). Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36(3), 541-572. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(95)01223-0
  12. Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909-1940. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhq009
  13. Hart, A. (2001). Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: Differences in spread can be important. BMJ, 323(7309), 391-393. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7309.391
  14. Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica, 50(1), 213-224. doi:10.2307/1912538
  15. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., & Scharfstein, D. (1991). Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 33-60. doi:10.2307/2937905
  16. Hovakimian, G. (2009). Determinants of investment cash flow sensitivity. Financial Management, 38(1), 161-183. doi:10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01032.x
  17. Hubbard, R. G. (1998). Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 193-225. doi:10.3386/w5996
  18. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169-215. doi:10.1162/003355397555163
  19. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (2000). Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints (Working Paper No. 7659). NBER. https://www.nber.org/papers/w7659 adresinden erişildi.
  20. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6. bs.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  21. Key, N., & Roberts, M. J. (2005). Financial market imperfections and structural change in agriculture. A. R. Bellows (Ed.). Focus on agricultural economics içinde (s. 29-51). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  22. Lamont, O., Polk, C., & Saa-Requejo, J. (2001). Financial constraints and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies 14(2), 529-554.
  23. Love, I. (2003). Financial development and financing constraints: International evidence from the structural investment model. Review of Financial Studies, 16(3), 765-791. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhg013
  24. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. F. (2013). Corporate finance (10. baskı). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  25. Schaller, H. (1993). Asymmetric information, liquidity constraints, and canadian investment. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 26(3), 552-574. doi:10.2307/135887
  26. Summers, L. H. (1981). Taxation and corporate investment: A q-theory approach. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1981(1), 67-127. doi:10.2307/2534397
  27. Whited, T. M. (1992). Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: evidence from panel data. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1425-1460. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04664.x
  28. Whited, T. M. and Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531-559. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj012