SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 26 Issue: 3

ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES ON CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION IN TÜRKİYE BY KRLS TECHNIQUE

Metin Dogan(Piri Reis Üniversitesi)0000-0002-5832-7212
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that environmental taxes, one of the variables in the model, reduce carbon emissions in line with the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climate change mitigation policies involve a combination of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These strategies include transitioning to renewable energy sources, implementing taxation policies to discourage carbon-intensive activities, and enhancing energy efficiency across various sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that environmental taxes, one of the variables in the model, reduce carbon emissions in line with the literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Climate Change · Mitigation and Adaptation · Environmental Taxes

Abstract

Climate change mitigation policies involve a combination of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These strategies include transitioning to renewable energy sources, implementing taxation policies to discourage carbon-intensive activities, and enhancing energy efficiency across various sectors. In this study, an analysis covering the period between 1988 and 2022 was conducted to evaluate Türkiye's climate change mitigation policies. In this analysis, kernel based least squares, which is a machine learning method, and quantile regression techniques were used for estimation. It is concluded that environmental taxes, one of the variables in the model, reduce carbon emissions in line with the literature. Renewable energy is also a useful tool for reducing carbon emissions. The other variables, energy efficiency and per capita energy use, are found to increase carbon emissions. In the literature, the idea of using environmental tax revenues for energy efficiency investments is often emphasized. However, the results of energy efficiency in Türkiye are contrary to expectations. This means that climate change mitigation and adaptation policies will not have the same results in all countries and these policies should be determined according to local conditions. While determining climate change policies in Türkiye, alternative policies related to energy consumption should be discussed due to the negative effects of energy efficiency and per capita energy use.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dogan, M. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES ON CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION IN TÜRKİYE BY KRLS TECHNIQUE. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 26 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1666310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Abbass, K., Qasim, M.Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H. & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
  2. Abid, N., Ahmad, F., Aftab, J., & Razzaq, A. (2023). A blessing or a burden? assessing the impact of climate change mitigation efforts in Europe using quantile regression models. Energy Policy, 178.
  3. Ahmad, M., Jida, Z., Haq, I. U., Tufail, M., & Saud, S. (2024). Linking green transportation and technology, and environmental taxes for transport carbon emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 136., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104450
  4. Akram, R., Chen, F., Khalid, F., Ye, Z., & Majeed, M. T. (2020). Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119122
  5. Balcilar, M. Usman, O. & Özkan, O (2023). Tourism development and u.s energy security risks: A krls machine learning approach. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2245109
  6. Bashir, M. F., Ma, B., Bashir, M. A., Radulescu, M., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Investigating the role of environmental taxes and regulations for renewable energy consumption: evidence from developed economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 1262-1284, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1962383
  7. Beyerlein, B. (2014). Quantile regression—opportunities and challenges from a user's perspective. American Journal of Epidemiology, 180(3), 330-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu178
  8. Brock, W.A., Dechert, W.D. & Scheinkman, J.A. (1987). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. University of Wisconsin at Madison, University of Houston, and University of Chicago.
  9. Brock, W. A., W. D. Dechert, J. A. Scheinkman, & LeBaron, B. (1996). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews, 15(3), 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800353
  10. Buhai, S. (2005). Quantile regression: overview and selected applications. Ad Astra, 4(4), 1-17. https://www.sebastianbuhai.com/papers/publications/quantile_regressions.pdf
  11. Burton, M. H. (2021). Less levity Professor Stern! economic growth, climate change and the decoupling question, in burton, M. H. et all (Ed.), A viable future? Explorations in post-growth from steady state Manchester. Steady State Manchester
  12. Chung-En Liu, J, Bauman, Y. & Chuang, Y. (2019). Climate change and economics 101: teaching the greatest market failure. Sustainability, 11(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051340
  13. Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
  14. Dahmani, M. (2024). Environmental quality and sustainability: exploring the role of environmental taxes, environment-related technologies, and r&d expenditure. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 26, 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00387-9
  15. Eurostat (2024). Energy efficiency. https://doi.org/10.2908/NRG_IND_EFF
  16. Fawzy, S., Osman, A.I., Doran, J. et al (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18, 2069–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w
  17. Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Guan, D., Contestabile, M., Minx, H. & Barrett, J. (2010). Distributional effects of climate change taxation: the case of the UK. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902974g
  18. Ferwerda, J., Hainmueller, J., & Hazlett, C. J. (2017). Kernel-Based regularized least squares in R (KRLS) and Stata (krls). Journal of Statistical Software, 79(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v079.i03
  19. Galvin, R. (2023). Central banks and green new deals what role can they play? In K. Tienhaara, & J. Robinson (Eds), Handbook on the green new deal. Routledge
  20. Ghazouani, A., Jebli, M.B. & Shahzad, U. (2021). Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28, 22758–22767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9
  21. Gittell, R. & Stillwagon, J. (2016). The effects of US state-level energy and environmental policies on clean tech innovation and employment. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v6n2p1
  22. Gough, I. (2021). From welfare states to planetary well-being. In D. Beland et al, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state. Oxford University Press
  23. Hainmueller J, & Hazlett C (2014). Kernel regularized least squares: reducing misspecification bias with a flexible and interpretable machine learning approach. Political Analysis, 22(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt019
  24. He, P., Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Ning, J. (2023). Will environmental taxes help to mitigate climate change? a comparative study based on OECD countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 1440-1464.
  25. Hovardas, T. (2016). Two paradoxes with one stone: a critical reading of ecological modernization. Ecological Economics, 130, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.023
  26. Javid, M., & Khan, M. (2020). Energy efficiency and underlying carbon emission trends. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 3224–3236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07019-4
  27. Kalinowski, T. (2020). The politics of climate change in a neo-developmental state: the case of south korea, International Political Science Review, 42(1) 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120924741
  28. Khalfan, A. et al. (2023). Climate equality: A planet for the 99%. Oxfam International. 10.21201/2023.000001
  29. Koenker. R., & Bassett, G. Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33–50.
  30. Kolsuz, G., & Yeldan, A. E. (2017). Economics of climate change and green employment: a general equilibrium investigation for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1240–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.025
  31. Li, R., Li, L., & Wang, Q. (2022). The impact of energy efficiency on carbon emissions: evidence from the transportation sector in Chinese 30 provinces. Sustainable Cities and Society, 82, 103880 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103880.
  32. Liu, Q. & Gao, J. (2020). Public health co-benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, in health of people, health of planet and our responsibility, in Al-Delaimy, W.K. et al (Ed), Health of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility. Springer
  33. Luciani, G. (2020). The impacts of the energy transition on growth and income distribution, in Hafner, M. & Tagliapietra, S. (ed), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition, Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2
  34. Mahapatra, B., & Irfan, M. (2021). Asymmetric impacts of energy efficiency on carbon emissions: a comparative analysis between developed and developing economies. Energy, 227, 120485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120485
  35. Miceikiene, A., Čiulevičienė, V., Rauluskeviciene, J., & Štreimikienė, D. (2018). Assessment of the effect of environmental taxes on environmental protection. Ekonomický Časopis, 66(3), 286-308.
  36. Moore, J. W. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, Kairos Books, Michigan.
  37. Niu, T., Yao, X., Shao, S., Li, D., & Wang, W. (2018). Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: an estimated DSGE model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.06.005
  38. Nyambuu, U., & Semmler, W. (2023). Sustainable macroeconomics, climate risks and energy transitions: Dynamic modeling, empirics, and policies. Springer Nature
  39. OECD Data (2024-a). Air and GHG emissions. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateArchiveDMZ&df[id]=DF_DP_LIVE&df[ag]=OECD&df[vs]=&av=true&pd=2022%2C2022&dq=TUR%2BOECD%2BOAVG.AIREMISSION.A&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&vw=tb, accessed on 1 Dec 2024
  40. OECD Data (2024-b). Environmentally related tax revenue. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&tm=DF_ERTR&pg=0&snb=1&vw=tb&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_ERTR%40DF_ERTR&df[ag]=OECD.ENV.EPI&df[vs]=&pd=2017%2C&dq=A.TAXREV._T._T.USD.&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false
  41. OECD Data (2024-c). Renewable energy. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateArchiveDMZ&df[id]=DF_DP_LIVE&df[ag]=OECD&df[vs]=&av=true&pd=1988%2C2022&dq=TUR.RENEWABLE.A&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&vw=tb&ly[cl]=TIME_PERIOD&ly[rs]=MEASURE&ly[rw]=SUBJECT&lb=id
  42. Özkan, O., & Çoban, M. N. (2022). Türkiye’de kirlilik hale hipotezi ve ekonomik büyüme, ekonomik küreselleşme ve ekolojik ayak izi bağlantısı: KRLS’den kanıtlar. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 18(4), 1049-1068. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1143139
  43. Özkan, O., et al. (2024). Global impact of geopolitical oil price uncertainty and associated commodity prices on clean energy stocks, Energy & Environment, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231225303
  44. Pistelli, L. (2020). Addressing africa’s energy dilemma. In Hafner, M. & Tagliapietra, S., (Eds.), The geopolitics of the global energy transition. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2
  45. Phillips P.C., & Perron P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75. 2.335
  46. Sarıgül, S. S., & Topcu, B. A. (2021). The impact of environmental taxes on carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 3(1), 43-54.
  47. Schellnhuber, H. J., & Martin, M. A. (2020). Climate change, public health, social peace. In W.K. Al-Delaimy, V. Ramanathan, & M. S. Sorondo (Eds), Health of people, health of planet and our responsibility. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4_11
  48. Scrimgeour, F., Oxley, L., & Fatai, K. (2005). reducing carbon emissions? the relative effectiveness of different types of environmental tax: the case of New Zealand, Environmental Modelling & Software, 20(11), 1439-1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.09.024
  49. Shahzad, U. (2020). Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: theoretical survey with policy implications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 24848–24862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4
  50. Siegmeier, J., Mattauch, L., Franks, M., Klenert, D., Schultes, A., & Edenhofer, O. (2017). The fiscal benefits of stringent climate change mitigation: an overview. Climate Policy, 18(3), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1400943
  51. Ugurlu-Yildirim, E., & Kocaarslan, B. (2024). The role of government integrity in the impact of environmental taxes on comparative advantage in environmental goods and climate change in emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144014
  52. Von Braun, J. (2020). Climate change risks for agriculture, health, and nutrition. In W.K. Al-Delaimy, V. Ramanathan, & M. S. Sorondo (Eds), Health of people, health of planet and our responsibility. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4_11
  53. Wolde-Rufael, Y. & Mulat-Weldemeskel, E. (2021). Do environmental taxes and environmental stringency policies reduce co2 emissions? evidence from 7 emerging economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 22392–22408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11475-8
  54. World Bank Data (2024). Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita)-Turkiye, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE
  55. Zhang, Z., & Zheng, Q. (2023). Sustainable development via environmental taxes and efficiency in energy: evaluating trade adjusted carbon emissions. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2400
  56. Zhu, Y., Taylor, D., & Wang, Z. (2023). The role of environmental taxes on carbon emissions in countries aiming for net-zero carbon emissions: Does renewable energy consumption matter?. Renewable Energy, 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119239
  57. Zivot, E., & Wang, J. (2006). Nonlinear time series models. In Modeling financial time series with S-PLUS®. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32348-0_18
  58. OECD Data (2024-a). Air and GHG emissions. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateArchiveDMZ&df[id]=DF_DP_LIVE&df[ag]=OECD&df[vs]=&av=true&pd=2022%2C2022&dq=TUR%2BOECD%2BOAVG.AIREMISSION.A&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&vw=tb, accessed on 1 Dec 2024
  59. OECD Data (2024-b). Environmentally related tax revenue. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&tm=DF_ERTR&pg=0&snb=1&vw=tb&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_ERTR%40DF_ERTR&df[ag]=OECD.ENV.EPI&df[vs]=&pd=2017%2C&dq=A.TAXREV._T._T.USD.&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false
  60. OECD Data (2024-c). Renewable energy. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateArchiveDMZ&df[id]=DF_DP_LIVE&df[ag]=OECD&df[vs]=&av=true&pd=1988%2C2022&dq=TUR.RENEWABLE.A&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&vw=tb&ly[cl]=TIME_PERIOD&ly[rs]=MEASURE&ly[rw]=SUBJECT&lb=id