SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 26 Issue: 3

EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL COMPARISON TENDENCY ON CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION IN TERMS OF PROBLEMATIC SOCIAL MEDIA USE

Yusuf Ozan Yıldırım(DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0346-2660
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Marketers need to adopt responsible marketing practices that foster healthy engagement and reduce the risk of exacerbating comparison tendencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the impact of social comparison tendency on conspicuous consumption, while testing the moderating role of problematic social media usage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 256 data is used for analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Marketers need to adopt responsible marketing practices that foster healthy engagement and reduce the risk of exacerbating comparison tendencies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Comparison Tendency · Conspicuous Consumption · Problematic Social Media Use

Abstract

This study examines the impact of social comparison tendency on conspicuous consumption, while testing the moderating role of problematic social media usage. Furthermore, it investigates the influence of problematic social media usage on conspicuous consumption based on the frequency of social media use. Using quantitative design, research data were obtained using an online survey with purposive sampling. A total of 256 data is used for analysis. The results reveal that social comparison tendency directly influences conspicuous consumption, and this effect diminishes as problematic social media usage increases. Additionally, problematic social media usage significantly affects conspicuous consumption, with a ranking of impact by social media platform as follows: TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and Snapchat. In the case of Facebook, no significant effect of problematic social media usage on conspicuous consumption was found. These findings suggest that the relationship between social comparison and conspicuous consumption is affected by problematic social media use and that problematic social media use has different effects on conspicuous consumption across different platforms. Findings also offer important marketing implications. Marketers need to adopt responsible marketing practices that foster healthy engagement and reduce the risk of exacerbating comparison tendencies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldırım, Y. O. (2025). EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL COMPARISON TENDENCY ON CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION IN TERMS OF PROBLEMATIC SOCIAL MEDIA USE. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 26 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1642648

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. materialism, social comparison, and bandwagon effect. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 17(1), pp. 55-69. doi: 10.20473/jmtt.v17i1.52307
  2. Askari, M., & Rashid, R. M. (2024). Fomo: a hazard or an opportunity, its impact on fashion buying, with the mediating effect of anxiety and the role of conspicuous sharing: fomo and fashion buying. Journal of Business & Tourism, 10(02), pp. 39-55. doi: 10.34260/jbt.v10i02.300
  3. BMC Psychiatry. (2023). Six addiction components of problematic social media use in relation to depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms: a latent profile analysis and network analysis. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-023-04837-2
  4. Braun, O. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1989). Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic psychology, 10(2), pp. 161-187. doi: 10.1016/0167-4870(89)90018-4
  5. Bronner, F., & de Hoog, R. (2018). Conspicuous consumption and the rising importance of experiential purchases. International Journal of Market Research, 60(1), pp. 88-103. doi: 10.1177/1470785317744667
  6. Çetinkaya, A., Kırık, A. M., & Gündüz, Ü. (2021). Fear of missing out and problematic social media use: research among university students in Turkey. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 12(47), pp. 12-31. doi: 10.5824/ajite.2021.04.001.x
  7. Chaudhuri, H. R., & Majumdar, S. (2006). Of diamonds and desires: understanding conspicuous consumption from a contemporary marketing perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2006 (11), pp. 1-18.
  8. Chen, E. Y., Yeh, N. C., & Wang, C. P. (2008). Conspicuous consumption: A preliminary report of scale development and validation. Advances in Consumer Research, 35(1), pp. 686-687.
  9. Dinh, T. C., & Lee, Y. (2022). “I want to be as trendy as influencers”–how “fear of missing out” leads to buying intention for products endorsed by social media influencers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(3), pp. 346-364. doi: 10.1108/JRIM-04-2021-0127
  10. Dündar, M. A., & Tufan, F. (2022). Social comparison behaviour on social network sites: The comparison between Twitter and Instagram. Yeni Medya, 2022(12), pp. 1-16. doi: 10.55609/yenimedya.1051044
  11. Durmuş, B., Yurtkour, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde spss’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık. Ferrer, A. M., Gonzalez, F. M., & Nesterova, I. (2024). Conspicuous consumption and visible inequality (No. 81). Working Paper Series.
  12. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  13. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. UK: Sage: Newcastle Tyne.
  14. Franchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., Van Rooij, A. J., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018). Fear of missing out as a predictor of problematic social media use and phubbing behavior among Flemish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), pp. 1-18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102319
  15. Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), p. 129.
  16. Griffiths, M. D. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197. doi:10.1080/14659890500114359.
  17. Güneş, H., Altunışık, R., & Sarıkaya, N. (2023). Sosyal karşılaştırma eğilimin sosyal ağlardaki gösteriş tüketimi etkisinde kendini tanıtma arzusunun aracı rolü: Z kuşağı üzerinde bir araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(2), pp. 658-678. doi: 10.15295/bmij.v11i2.2231
  18. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis 7th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  19. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem) using r: a workbook. Springer Nature.
  20. Hamilton, D., & Tilman, R. (1983). Conspicuous consumption: a study of exceptional consumer behavior. Journal of Economic Issues, 17(3), pp. 791-799. doi: 10.1080/00213624.1983.11504157
  21. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
  22. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication monographs, 85(1), pp. 4-40. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
  23. Jebarajakirthy, C., & Das, M. (2020). How self-construal drives intention for status consumption: A moderated mediated mechanism. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102065
  24. Jebarajakirthy, C., & Das, M. (2021). Uniqueness and luxury: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102477
  25. Jin, S. V., & Ryu, E. (2024). “Vanity fair on Instagram”: The roles of vanity, materialism, social comparison, Instagram usage intensity, and market mavenism in social commerce. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 14, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2024.100133
  26. Kumar, B., Bagozzi, R. P., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2022). Conspicuous consumption: A meta-analytic review of its antecedents, consequences, and moderators. Journal of Retailing, 98(3), pp. 471-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.10.003
  27. Lee, S. Y. (2014). How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites?: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, pp. 253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.009
  28. Lewin, K. M., Ellithorpe, M. E., & Meshi, D. (2022). Social comparison and problematic social media use: Relationships between five different social media platforms and three different social comparison constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 199, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111865
  29. Lu, Y., Zhao, T., Song, S., & Song, W. (2024). Can self-presentation on social media increase individuals’ conspicuous consumption tendency? a mixed-method empirical study on wechat in china. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(2), pp. 1206-1221. doi: 10.3390/jtaer19020062
  30. Midi, H., Sarkar, S. K., & Rana, S. (2010). Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), pp. 253-267. doi: 10.1080/09720502.2010.10700699
  31. Nguyen, T. D., Ma, M., Gai, L., & Ngamsiriudom, W. (2015). From consumer socialization to status consumption: a cross cultures study among high school students. In Thriving in a New World Economy: Proceedings of the 2012 World Marketing Congress/Cultural Perspectives in Marketing Conference (pp. 172-175). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  32. O'cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 4(1), pp. 25-39. doi: 10.1002/cb.155
  33. Oh, G. E. (2021). Social class, social self-esteem, and conspicuous consumption. Heliyon, 7(2), pp. 1-11. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration And Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544.
  34. Pew Research Center. (2024a). How Americans Use Social Media. https://www.pewresearch.org
  35. Pew Research Center. (2024b). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org
  36. Reer, F., Tang, W. Y., & Quandt, T. (2019). Psychosocial well-being and social media engagement: The mediating roles of social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1486-1505.
  37. Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), pp. 549-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.005
  38. Russell, Z. A., & Boley, B. B. (2024). What would you sacrifice for the ‘gram? Developing and testing the Social Media Sacrifice Scale (SMSS). Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 41(5), pp. 689-704. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2024.2332274
  39. Sahin, O., & Nasir, S. (2022). The effects of status consumption and conspicuous consumption on perceived symbolic status. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(1), pp. 68-85. doi: 10.1080/10696679.2021.1888649
  40. Shin, S.-A., Jang, J.-O., Kim, J.-K., & Cho, E.-H. (2021). Relations of conspicuous consumption tendency, self-expression satisfaction, and sns use satisfaction of gen z through sns activities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11979. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211979
  41. Suryandari, R. T., & Jeon, S. (2015). Consumers’ conspicuousness and its underlying traits. In Thriving in a New World Economy: Proceedings of the 2012 World Marketing Congress/Cultural Perspectives in Marketing Conference (pp. 164-167). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  42. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics. 7th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  43. Thoumrungroje, A. (2014). The influence of social media intensity and EWOM on conspicuous consumption. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, p. 715. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.009
  44. Xu, L., Lu, Z., Wang, L., Chen, J., Tian, L., Cai, S., & Peng, S. (2023). The effect of social network use on chinese college students’ conspicuous consumption: a moderated mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9), pp. 1-14. doi: 10.3390/bs13090732
  45. Yao, S. X., Lee, J., Reynolds, R. M., & Ellithorpe, M. E. (2025). Problematic social media use in 3D? Relationships between traditional social media use, social virtual reality (VR) use, and mental health. Plos One, 20(1), doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314863
  46. Young, R., Kananovich, V., & Johnson, B. G. (2023). Young adults’ folk theories of how social media harms its users. Mass Communication and Society, 26(1), pp. 23-46. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2021.1970186
  47. Zheng, X., Baskin, E., & Peng, S. (2018). Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption. Journal of Business Research, 90, 196-205.