Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 1

CROSS-CULTURAL LEADERSHIP TRENDS: TURKISH AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES WITH BIBLIOMETRIC AND CONTENT ANALYSES

Gökmen Durmuş(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İŞLETME BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-5809-8459
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the field is dominated by multi-level quantitative research models, the majority of which heavily lean towards Hofstede and Schwartz's cultural studies in terms of theoretical underpinnings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cross-cultural leadership is the capacity to lead and guide a multicultural team made up of individuals from various cultural backgrounds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Leaders can fully utilize a diverse workforce and achieve increased innovation, better performance, and a competitive advantage by comprehending and managing cultural differences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the field is dominated by multi-level quantitative research models, the majority of which heavily lean towards Hofstede and Schwartz's cultural studies in terms of theoretical underpinnings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cross-Cultural Leadership · Bibliometric Analysis · Scientometrics

Abstract

Cross-cultural leadership is the capacity to lead and guide a multicultural team made up of individuals from various cultural backgrounds. Leaders can fully utilize a diverse workforce and achieve increased innovation, better performance, and a competitive advantage by comprehending and managing cultural differences. The aim of this study is to map out the existing cross-cultural leadership literature via bibliometric and content analysis methods. To this end, SSCI-indexed articles in the Web of Science database from 1975 to 2025 were considered. Only 155 articles satisfy these criteria out of 1,422 primary and 30,238 secondary documents, with 13 articles among the 20 in total in the Turkish sample. The global sample (N=155) and the Turkish sample (N=13) are analyzed via the VOSviewer program in terms of co-authorship, citation, co-citation, co-word, and bibliographic coupling analyses. It was concluded that the field is dominated by multi-level quantitative research models, the majority of which heavily lean towards Hofstede and Schwartz's cultural studies in terms of theoretical underpinnings. Methodological diversity is not as common as in the field. Similarly, the Turkish literature followed the same path as the extracted cross-cultural sample.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durmuş, G. (2026). CROSS-CULTURAL LEADERSHIP TRENDS: TURKISH AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES WITH BIBLIOMETRIC AND CONTENT ANALYSES. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 27 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1744152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (105)

  1. Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B. (2016). Charisma: An Ill-defined and Ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062305
  2. Arnold, D. G., Goodpaster, K. E., & Weaver, G. R. (2015). Past trends and future directions in business ethics and corporate responsibility scholarship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4), v–xv. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.10
  3. Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self‐other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00848.x
  4. Autio, E., Pathak, S., & Wennberg, K. (2013). Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334–362. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.15
  5. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
  6. Aycan, Z. (2000). Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology: Contributions, past developments, and future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031001009
  7. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism. In: Kim, U., Yang, KS., Hwang, KK. (eds) Indigenous and Cultural Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
  8. Aycan, Z., Schyns, B., Sun, J., Felfe, J., & Saher, N. (2013). Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), 962–969. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.48
  9. Ayman, R., & Chemers, M. M. (1983). Relationship of supervisory behavior ratings to work group effectiveness and subordinate satisfaction among Iranian managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(2), 338–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.2.338
  10. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.52.2.130
  11. Batista-Canino, R. M., Santana-Hernández, L., & Medina-Brito, P. (2024). A holistic literature review on entrepreneurial Intention: A scientometric approach. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114480
  12. Batistič, S., Černe, M., & Vogel, B. (2017). Just how multi-level is leadership research? A document co-citation analysis 1980–2013 on leadership constructs and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.007
  13. Batistič, S., & van der Laken, P. (2019). History, evolution and future of big data and analytics: A bibliometric analysis of its relationship to performance in organizations. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12340
  14. Beer, M., Finnström, M., & Schrader, D. (2016). Why leadership training fails—and what to do about. Harvard Business Review. 94(12), 19-20. https://hbr.org/2016/10/why-leadership-training-fails-and-what-to-do-about-it
  15. Bracht, E. M., Monzani, L., Boer, D., Haslam, S. A., Kerschreiter, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Barghi, B., Dumont, K., Edelmann, C. M., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., Giessner, S., Gleibs, I. H., González, R., Laguía González, A., Lipponen, J., … van Dick, R. (2023). Innovation across cultures: Connecting leadership, identification, and creative behavior in organizations. Applied Psychology, 72(1), 348–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12381
  16. Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., Akerblom, S., Audia, G., Bakacsi, G., … Wunderer, R. (2000). Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900166859
  17. Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics: a journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0924-8
  18. Caligiuri, P., & Tarique, I. (2012). Dynamic cross-cultural competencies and global leadership effectiveness. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.014
  19. Cavusgil, S. T., & Das, A. (1997). Methodological issues in empirical cross-cultural research: a survey of the management literature and a framework. MIR: Management International Review, 37(1), 71-96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40228388
  20. Collins Dictionary. (2011). Leader. In Collins dictionary (11th ed., p. 938). HarperCollins Publishers.
  21. De Falco, S. E., Montera, R., Leo, S., Laviola, F., Vito, P., Sardanelli, D., Basile, G., Nevi, G., & Alaia, R. (2024). Trends and patterns in ESG research: A bibliometric odyssey and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 3703–3723. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2744
  22. DeChurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010). Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009
  23. Deloitte. (2023). Deloitte global human capital trends report 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2025, from https://www2.deloitte.com/hr/en/pages/press/articles/Global-Human-Capital-Trends-2023.html
  24. Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., … Zhou, J. (1999). Culture-specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00018-1
  25. Dickson, M. W., Castaño, N., Magomaeva, A., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2012). Conceptualizing leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.002
  26. Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 729–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.002
  27. Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002
  28. Dirilen‐Gumus, O. (2016). Cross-cultural comparison of political leaders’ operational codes. International Journal of Psychology, 52(S1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12264
  29. Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A., & House, R. (2012). GLOBE: A twenty-year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.004
  30. Dorfman, P.W., & Howell, J.P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. In E.G. McGoun (Ed.), Advances in International Comparative Management, 3 (pp.127-149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  31. Du, X., Feng, F., & Lv, W. (2022). Bibliometric overview of organizational legitimacy research. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221099524
  32. Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: A bibliometric study of the journal of product innovation management, 1984-2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00726.x
  33. Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24(3), 265–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400302
  34. Erez, M., Lisak, A., Harush, R., Glikson, E., Nouri, R., & Shokef, E. (2013). Going global: Developing management students’ cultural intelligence and global identity in culturally diverse virtual teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 330–355. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0200
  35. Flatten, T., Adams, D., & Brettel, M. (2015). Fostering absorptive capacity through leadership: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.08.010
  36. Frost, E. (1920). What industry wants and does not want from the psychologist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073012
  37. Gardner, W. L., Lowe, K. B., Moss, T. W., Mahoney, K. T., & Cogliser, C. C. (2010). Scholarly leadership of the study of leadership: A review of The Leadership Quarterly's second decade, 2000–2009. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 922–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.003
  38. Gelfand, M. J., Aycan, Z., Erez, M., & Leung, K. (2017). Cross-cultural industrial organizational psychology and organizational behavior: A hundred-year journey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000186
  39. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(94)90024-8
  40. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  41. Grijalva, E., & Newman, D. A. (2015). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, big five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology, 64(1), 93–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12025
  42. Haire, M., Ghiselli, E. E., & Porter, L. W. (1966). Managerial thinking: An international study. Wiley.
  43. Hofstede, G. (1980a). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
  44. Hofstede, G. (1980b). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3
  45. Hofstede, G. J., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53071579
  46. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A Social Identity Theory of Leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
  47. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications.
  48. Jago, A. G., Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1994). Leadership and information processing: linking perceptions and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 345. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393243
  49. Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & De Luque, M. S. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234
  50. Jiang, Y., Colakoglu, S., Lepak, D. P., Blasi, J. R., & Kruse, D. L. (2014). Involvement work systems and operational effectiveness: Exploring the moderating effect of national power distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.61
  51. Jiang, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, Z., & Herbert, K. (2024). Safety leadership: A bibliometric literature review and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 172, Article 114437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114437
  52. Kabasakal, H., Dastmalchian, A., & Imer, P. (2011). Organizational citizenship behavior: A study of young executives in Canada, Iran, and Turkey. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2703–2729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.599943
  53. Karacay, G., Bayraktar, S., Kabasakal, H., & Dastmalchian, A. (2019). Role of leaders as agents of negotiation for counterbalancing cultural dissonance in the Middle East and North Africa region. Journal of International Management, 25(4), Article 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2019.100704
  54. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., Gumusluoglu, L., Erturk, A., & Scandura, T. A. (2021). Two to tango? a cross-cultural investigation of the leader-follower agreement on authoritarian leadership. Journal of Business Research, 128, 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.034
  55. Khan, H., Ozkan, K. S. L., Deligonul, S., & Cavusgil, E. (2024). Redefining the organizational resilience construct using a frame-based methodology: A new perspective from the ecology-based approach. Journal of Business Research, 172, Article 114397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114397
  56. Kirkman, B., Law, K., Kirkman, B. L., & Law, K. S. K. (2005a). From the editors: international management research in “amj”: Our Past, Present, and Future. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 377–386. https://doi.org//10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407902
  57. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chen, G., & Salas, E. (2017). Supplemental material for one hundred years of the journal of applied psychology: background, evolution, and scientific trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000192.supp
  58. Lamberg, J. A., Ojala, J., & Gustafsson, J. P. (2022). Strategy and business history rejoined: How and why strategic management concepts took over business history. Business History, 64(6), 1011–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2020.1856076
  59. Lee, K., Scandura, T. A., & Sharif, M. M. (2014). Cultures have consequences: A configural approach to leadership across two cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.03.003
  60. Lisak, A., & Erez, M. (2015). Leadership emergence in multicultural teams: The power of global characteristics. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.01.002
  61. Liu, Y., Mai, F., & Macdonald, C. (2019). A Big-Data Approach to Understanding the thematic landscape of the field of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3806-5
  62. Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000089
  63. Lowe, K. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Ten years of the leadership quarterly. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 459–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00059-x
  64. Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H., & Janssens, M. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 17, pp. 167–214). JAI Press.
  65. Markham, S. E. (2010). Leadership, levels of analysis, and déjà vu: Modest proposals for taxonomy and cladistics coupled with replication and visualization. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1121–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.011
  66. Mascarenhas, M. F., Dübbers, F., Hoszowska, M., Köseoğlu, A., Karakasheva, R., Topal, A. B., Izydorczyk, D., & Lemoine, J. E. (2018). The Power of Choice: A study protocol on how identity leadership fosters commitment toward the organization. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01677
  67. Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128
  68. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
  69. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
  70. Meuser, J. D., Gardner, W. L., Dinh, J. E., Hu, J., Liden, R. C., & Lord, R. G. (2016). A network analysis of leadership theory. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1374–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647099
  71. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  72. Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.659
  73. Oludapo, S., Carroll, N., & Helfert, M. (2024). Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 174, Article 114528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114528
  74. Oxford Dictionary. (2010). Leader in Oxford Dictionary (3rd ed., p.1003). Oxford University Press.
  75. Paul, K. (2004). Business and society and business ethics journals: a citation and impact analysis. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 35(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.35.2.103
  76. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454
  77. Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology 53(4), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00185.x
  78. Redhouse Dictionary. (2017). Lider. In Redhouse sözlüğü: Türkçe/Osmanlıca-İngilizce. (21st ed., p.741). Say Yayıncılık.
  79. Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3242-1
  80. Resick, C. J., Martin, G. S., Keating, M. A., Dickson, M. W., Kwan, H. K., & Peng, C. (2011). What ethical leadership means to me: asian, american, and european perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0730-8
  81. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.2307/258126
  82. Sadri, G., Weber, T. J., & Gentry, W. A. (2011). Empathic emotion and leadership performance: An empirical analysis across 38 countries. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 818–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.005
  83. Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103251542
  84. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kağitçibaşi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Sage.
  85. Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047412977_007
  86. Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Bobbs-Merrill.
  87. Seyhan, M., Durmuş, G., Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö., & Bayar, Y. (2024). A bibliometric study on business history [İşletme tarihi üzerine bibliyometrik bir çalışma]. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.1438419
  88. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
  89. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
  90. Training Industry. (2021). The size of the training industry. https://trainingindustry.com/wiki/learning-services-and-outsourcing/size-of-training-industry
  91. Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S., & Ou, A. Y. (2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 426–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300818
  92. Türkçe Sözlük. (1998). Lider. In Türkçe Sözlük (9th ed., p.1464). Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  93. Türköz, T. (2023). Yönetim Alanındaki dönüşümcü liderlik kavramının son 35 yıllık gelişimi. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 09(3), 87–106. https://www.ibaness.org/bnejss/2023_09_03/11_Turkoz.pdf
  94. van Dick, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Dumont, K., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., Giessner, S., González, R., Kark, R., Lipponen, J., Markovits, Y., Monzani, L., Orosz, G., Pandey, D., Roland-Lévy, C., Schuh, S., … Haslam, S. A. (2018). Identity leadership going global: Validation of the identity leadership inventory across 20 countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 697–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12223
  95. Vogel, B., Reichard, R. J., Batistič, S., & Černe, M. (2021). A bibliometric review of the leadership development field: How we got here, where we are, and where we are headed. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101381
  96. Walumbwa, F. O., & Lawler, J. J. (2003). Building effective organizations: Transformational leadership, collectivist orientation, work-related attitudes and withdrawal behaviours in three emerging economies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(7), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519032000114219
  97. Wasti, S. A., Peterson, M. F., Breitsohl, H., Cohen, A., Jørgensen, F., de Aguiar Rodrigues, A. C., Weng, Q., & Xu, X. (2016). Location, location, location: Contextualizing workplace commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2094
  98. Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., Brower, H. H., & Önder, Ç. (2007). Cross-cultural measurement of supervisor trustworthiness: An assessment of measurement invariance across three cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(5), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.004
  99. Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., & Erdil, S. E. (2011). Antecedents of trust across foci: A comparative study of turkey and china. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00186.x
  100. Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(02)00129-0
  101. Westfall, C. (2019, June 20). Leadership Development Is A $366 Billion Industry: Here’s Why Most Programs Don’t Work. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2019/06/20/leadership-development-why-most-programs-dont-work/?sh=58d175dc61de
  102. Wu, Y. L., Shao, B., Newman, A., & Schwarz, G. (2021). Crisis leadership: A review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6). 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101518
  103. Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6), 879–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.002
  104. Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., & Wang, D. X. (2011). Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.007
  105. Zhu, J., Song, L. J., Zhu, L., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Visualizing the landscape and evolution of leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.003